This paper introduces Choice Trees (CTrees), a monad for modeling nondeterministic, recursive, and impure programs in Rocq. Inspired by Xia et al.’s ((2019) Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 4(POPL)) ITrees, this novel data structure embeds computations into coinductive trees with three kinds of nodes: external events, internal steps, and delayed branching. This structure allows us to provide shallow embedding of denotational models with nondeterministic choice in the style of ccs, while recovering an inductive LTS view of the computation. CTrees leverage a vast collection of bisimulation and refinement tools well-studied on LTSs, with respect to which we establish a rich equational theory. We connect CTrees to the ITrees infrastructure by showing how a monad morphism embedding the former into the latter permits using CTrees to implement nondeterministic effects. We demonstrate the utility of CTrees by using them to model concurrency semantics in two case studies: ccs and cooperative multithreading.

The tail recursion modulo cons transformation can rewrite functions that are not quite tail-recursive into a tail-recursive form that can be executed efficiently. In this article, we generalize tail recursion modulo cons (TRMc) to modulo context (TRMC) and calculate a general TRMC algorithm from its specification. We can instantiate our general algorithm by providing an implementation of application and composition on abstract contexts and showing that our context laws hold. We provide some known instantiations of TRMC, namely modulo evaluation contexts (CPS), and associative operations, and further instantiations not so commonly associated with TRMC, such as defunctionalized evaluation contexts, monoids, semirings, exponents, and fields. We study the modulo cons instantiation in particular and prove that an instantiation using Minamide’s hole calculus is sound. We also calculate a second instantiation in terms of the Perceus heap semantics to precisely reason about the soundness of in-place update. While all previous approaches to TRMc fail in the presence of nonlinear control (e.g., induced by call/cc, shift/reset, or algebraic effect handlers), we can elegantly extend the heap semantics to a hybrid approach which dynamically adapts to nonlinear control flow. We have a full implementation of hybrid TRMc in the Koka language, and our benchmark shows the TRMc transformed functions are always as fast or faster than using manual alternatives.

One of the natural problems of operational semantics is to characterise the relationship between eager and lazy evaluation. In the context of $\lambda$-calculus, this is expressed by the classic theorem that call-by-value evaluation of a program to (weak-head) normal form can always be simulated by a call-by-name evaluation. While the statement and intuition behind it are simple and clear, naive attempts at proof famously fail: the result is usually established as a consequence of the more complex standardisation theorem. In this work, we develop and formalise a novel and lightweight inductive approach to tackle the problem of simulation between two semantics for a single calculus, but with different evaluation orders. We exercise our method on the classic call-by-value and call-by-name example and report on methodological takeaways suggested by our approach, in particular what effect the flavour of semantics chosen has on the proof.