Objectives/Goals: Community-based practices have limited research opportunities for providers. As a rural community-based health system, Mayo Clinic Health System (MCHS) sought to create intramural funding mechanisms to help early-stage researchers conduct pilot research so they are more competitive to compete for more robust extramural funding opportunities. Methods/Study Population: We created a Research Seed Grant Program infrastructure across our four MCHS regions (Southwest and Southeast Minnesota, Northwest and Southwest Wisconsin). This model program featured an initial research funding announcement call based on 6 prioritized programs (AI Validation & Stewardship, Cancer, Health Equity, Population Health, Rural Health, Learning Healthcare System [LHS]), with submissions uploaded to a central electronic repository. Proposal review and ranking was organized on a regional basis, with ranking of all proposals by at least 2 clinical scientist reviewers according to the NIH domain-specific framework (i.e., 1.0 best > 9.0 worst). Awards were competitively selected by conformity to prioritized research areas and through ranking of most competitive overall application scores. Results/Anticipated Results: For our inaugural RFA, we received 55 grant application submissions across the MCHS regions. Fifteen of the most highly ranked applications were selected for awards on a per region basis, providing direct funding as well as protected investigator research time of 10% for up to six months. The selected projects address several research priorities including improving access, reducing health disparities, improving behavioral health in our communities, increasing cancer screening and prevention, and community-based pragmatic trials and interventions. Outcomes from these now completed pilot projects remain pending at this time. Funding for this seed grant program was supported by philanthropy, Mayo Clinic Research Administration, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, and the Mayo Clinic CCaTS Rural Core. Discussion/Significance of Impact: We present this framework for a LHS-focused Seed Grant program model for consideration of adoption by other national/international LHS. Future plans include tracking of outcome metrics (e.g., published peer review articles, extramural grant applications) of this initial cycle and future expansion of this program to support the goals of our LHS.

Objectives/Goals: Clinical relevance of preclinical animal models is commonly in question. Herein, we investigated locoregional tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) differences in tumor-bearing murine oral cancer models, unresponsive to traditional immunotherapy, and also developed an oral tumor resection model to ultimately enhance translational relevance. Methods/Study Population: Here, we utilized carcinogen-induced, HPV-negative preclinical oral cancer models. For TIME studies, ROC1 cells were maintained as published. ROC1 tumors were established in the murine flank and oral cavity of wildtype C57Bl/6 mice, and tumor growth kinetics were assessed at each site. At distinct stages of tumor growth, tumors were harvested, as well as their respective corresponding inguinal and cervical tumor-draining lymph nodes (tdLNs). Multiparameter 28-marker spectral flow cytometry was performed to analyze immune cell populations at each site. For tumor resection studies, MOC2 tumors were similarly maintained and established in the oral cavity. MOC2 tumors were accessed via midline transcervical incisions. Upon tumor excision, wounds were closed with multiple interrupted Vicryl sutures. Results/Anticipated Results: We anticipated no differences between heterotopic and orthotopic tumor sites. Both sites displayed an initial period of delayed ROC1 tumor growth followed by rapid progression. Comprehensive analyses revealed low T cell infiltration overall and increases in select myeloid cells (i.e., macrophages and dendritic cells) over time in both models. Other immune cell types, however, generally increased over time in the flank. Differences between corresponding tdLNs further indicate deviating changes in immunosuppressive phenotypes (i.e., regulatory T cells and macrophages) and immune checkpoint marker expression. Additionally, MOC2 oral tumors were successfully resected with no visible remaining tumor. No subsequent healing complications were observed, and tumor recurrence occurred within 1 week post-surgery. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Tissue-specific TIME and tdLN differences may impact antitumor treatment and response. Ability to resect orthotopic tumors allows for modeling of standard-of-care treatment for oral cancer. These studies can enable tailoring of therapeutic strategies and provide insight into model selection and data interpretation from translational studies.

Objectives/Goals: This study aim to identify cervical cancer prevention barriers and facilitators, assess the associations between social determinants of health factors and cervical cancer prevention, and examine the association between levels of health literacy and willingness to undertake HPV vaccine and cervical cancer screening among Black and Hispanic women. Methods/Study Population: To achieve Aim 1, we will conduct a quantitative survey on barriers and facilitators to cancer prevention among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women. For Aim 2, we will assess the relationship between Social Determinants of Health and HPV vaccination/cervical cancer screening using the AHC Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool. For Aim 3, health literacy will be measured using the SAHL–S&E test and its association with willingness to vaccinate or cervical cancer screening. We will analyze the results using chi-square and logistic regression models. Participants will be recruited through multiple methods. We will recruit 250 individuals who were assigned female at birth and identify as non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic, aged 18–26 years, from Caddo and Bossier Parishes. Results/Anticipated Results: We expect to identify several barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer prevention among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women, including factors like access to care, cultural beliefs, and knowledge gaps. Social determinants of health (SDOH), such as income, education, and healthcare access, will likely show a strong association with lower HPV vaccination, Pap smear, and HPV screening rates. Additionally, we anticipate that lower health literacy will correlate with reduced willingness to vaccinate or screen for HPV. These findings can bridge the gap between research and practical health applications by guiding the design of community-based behavioral interventions that enhance cervical cancer prevention among minority populations. Discussion/Significance of Impact: This research is the first to assess how SDOH factors impact cervical cancer prevention among Blacks and Hispanic women in North Louisianawhile also exploring the role of health literacy in HPV vaccination and screening. Findings will drive practical interventions to reduce disparities and improve outcomes.

Objectives/Goals: Explore the association of gestational age of LPIs and neurodevelopment delay in children exposed to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Compare between groups if exposure to NICU affects neurodevelopment in children who were born between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation. Methods/Study Population: This is a cross-sectional study design to study the association of gestational age and neurodevelopmental delays in a birth cohort in Puerto Rico of children exposed to the NICU. Their neurodevelopment will be measured with the Bayley III. Statistical analysis will be performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 27.0. Descriptive statistics will be used, and normality distributions among all continuous variables, frequency distribution for categorical variables. We will recruit 30 infants between 18–24 months of age that were born between 34–37 weeks of gestation. Infant will be divided with regard to their exposure to NICU experience. Results/Anticipated Results: We anticipate identifying neurodevelopment delays among children born prematurely between 34 to 37 weeks of gestation. We anticipate that our controlled group will have better outcomes when compared to the controlled expose group. We also expect that gestational age impacts adversely neurodevelopment in children who were born between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Approximately 84% preterm birth are considered LPIs. Prematurity is described as a chronic condition; adverse long-term neurodevelopment consequences. Our study promotes early detection and interventions that can reduce the consequences of the neurodevelopment delays in LPIs.

Objectives/Goals: This study aims to evaluate diversity of participants in GLP-1 T2DKM clinical research with regard to sex, race, and ethnicity by using results data available through the ClinicalTrials.gov database. Sample population estimates for studies were calculated using the 2020 Census and compared within groups with respect to sex, race, and ethnicity. Methods/Study Population: The public ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched for interventional studies with GLP1 inclusion as treatment (n = 2,397). This search was then filtered to studies where results were reported (n = 772). From these studies, 466 studies focused on type 2 diabetes as a condition and thus became the analysis dataset. Participant and protocol information for these 466 studies were obtained from the clinical trials transformation initiative (CTTI) as an AACT data download. Observed to expected ratios were calculated for each subgroup-based population estimates from the 2020 Census and using the baseline counts of participants for studies where sex, race, and ethnicity were provided. In addition to within group comparisons, study characteristics (e.g. phase) were included in models to assess influence of covariates. Results/Anticipated Results: Of the 466 studies, 430 (92%) reported sex, 171 (37%) reported race, and 145 (31%) reported Hispanic ethnicity. Among those found to be underrepresented in studies (defined as a ratio < 1): females (mean  =  0.89, median  =  0.92); Black/African Americans (mean  =  0.88, median  =  0.39). Hispanic or Latinos mean ratio was 1.16 (95% CL: 0.97, 1.35) but had the least available data. When including covariates in the models, there were statistically significant differences in ratios with respect to sex as females had significantly lower odds compared to males (ratio > =  1), with the odds being about 21% of those for males. With respect to race, Black or African American individuals had significantly lower odds (about 32% of those of White individuals) (ratio > =  1). Discussion/Significance of Impact: This study reveals significant underrepresentation of females (mean ratio 0.89) and Black/African Americans (mean ratio 0.88) in clinical trials for GLP-1 drugs in type 2 diabetes. These disparities highlight the need for more inclusive research to ensure diverse populations benefit equally from medical advancements.

Interventions to foster inclusive learning environments may benefit college STEMM instructors (NASEM, 2019). We investigated the impact of a social inclusion intervention (SII) on scientific self-efficacy, identity, community values, and persistence intentions in a large and diverse sample of biomedical college instructors (n = 116) in the USA. The results indicated that the SII group developed stronger scientific community values than the control group, and the effect was the strongest for instructors who had initially expressed lower values. From a mentoring perspective, the intervention helps boost feelings of community values, which is linked to increased persistence in STEMM careers.

Objectives/Goals: Despite persistent health disparities, rural individuals are underrepresented in clinical trials, due in part to access barriers. We investigated if targeted strategies enhanced recruitment, engagement, and retention of rural adolescents in the TEENS+ randomized clinical trial, a 4-month family-based behavioral weight loss intervention. Methods/Study Population: Adolescents (12–16 y) and parents with obesity were eligible for TEENS+. Treatment converted to virtual in COVID-19, allowing eligibility to expand to more rural areas. We leveraged Informatics, a practice-based research network, and direct marketing to identify potential rural participants. Targeted engagement strategies included: rural physician outreach, physician-endorsed letters, providing tablets and mobile hotspots, reimbursing travel, and offering in-person or remote assessment visits. Chi-square tests evaluated differences in screener completion and enrollment of rural families before (T0) and after (T1) changes were made. Noninferiority tests evaluated rural vs. nonrural retention and engagement (% attendance, % dietary self-monitoring) and engagement based on digital tool receipt. Results/Anticipated Results: N = 211 dyads enrolled (n = 54 in T1: 48% male; 41% Black). Screener completion by rural families significantly increased from T0 (9.8%) to T1 (15.1%; p = .043). Yet, there was no significant change in rural adolescent enrollment (T0 = 10%; T1 = 9%; p = .844). Sixteen adolescents (30%) received study tablets, and none needed mobile hotspots. Mean adolescent attendance was 75%±28% for group and 94%±18% for individual sessions, with no significant differences based on rural status or tablet use. Rural adolescent self-monitoring (via app) was 28%, compared with 50% for non-rural adolescents (p = .074). Retention was 94% at 4m and 89% at 8m for T1 participants, with no differences based on rural status. At the primary endpoint (12 m), retention was significantly higher for rural (100%) vs. non-rural (87%) participants; p = .013. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Rural adolescent screener hits increased yet enrollment was unchanged. However, rural attendance was comparable and retention exceeded, compared to nonrural participants. Strategies to yield equitable representation and engagement in clinical trials are essential for geographic generalizability and to reduce rural health disparities.

Objectives/Goals: Inclusive physical activity (PA) interventions could improve trans and gender diverse (TGD) adolescents’ PA levels, perceived social support from peers and adults, and mental health, but no stakeholder-informed interventions exist. We describe parents’ impressions of TGD adolescent children’s PA experiences and advice for a PA intervention. Methods/Study Population: We conducted individual Zoom interviews with parents of 13- to 20-year-old TGD adolescents (n = 15). All parents were recruited from a gender healthcare clinic. All children self-identified as TGD, an umbrella term including people who have a gender identity different from social expectations for their assigned sex. We asked questions regarding children’s current and historical participation in PA, parents’ perceptions of barriers to PA for their TGD children, and parents’ desired intervention components. After each interview, parent participants were compensated $100 for their time. We analyzed interview transcripts, focusing on insights to incorporate in an intervention. This study was approved by the University’s Institutional Review Board. Results/Anticipated Results: Parents shared rich histories of their children’s PA participation, compounding barriers to PA, numerous benefits of PA, and a range of preferences for program activities and inclusive practices (e.g., safety protocols, training for adult leaders). They also emphasized the need for TGD youth to build social connectedness through PA. Discussion/Significance of Impact: We gathered concrete advice from parents on creating a PA intervention, which we will use to build a social PA program that meets TGD adolescents’ needs. Addressing health disparities and improving PA, social support, and mental health among TGD adolescents will require such stakeholder input to improve upon existing PA and sports opportunities.

Objectives/Goals: The objective of this project is to develop a tool for evaluating clinical trial (CT) eligibility criteria for demonstrated “gender literacy,” defined as the recognition that biologically assigned “sex” is distinct from personally defined “gender identity,” as a way to quantify the inclusion of gender minority populations. Methods/Study Population: The study is validating an assessment scale that evaluates gender literacy based on CT eligibility criteria (EC). Two health professionals will serve as “coders,” tasked with grading 15 CTs. EC for all CTs will be exported from clinicaltrials.gov. Once trained with using the scale, each coder will give a score for each trial. After this first scoring period, coders will share their scores and experiences using the scale. Coders will be tasked again with grading 15 new CTs. This second scoring period will yield final scores to calculate the inter-rater reliability (IRR), or the extent to which qualitative measurements are consistent and not due to random chance. IRR will be quantified by Cohen’s kappa to validate the scale. Results/Anticipated Results: Cohen’s kappa is on a continuous interval from 0 to 1, where 0 means no agreement and 1 means perfect agreement. It is expected that the Cohen’s kappa for this assessment scale will exceed 0.80. Such validation is necessary to ensure the scale is robust and dynamic for multiple use-cases and consistent across any coder. By having a discussion after the initial scoring period, we can identify confusions or challenges with the scale early on and correct them before the secondary scoring period. In comparing these two coders’ performance, it is expected that the second scores will be more similar, thus a kappa closer to 1. However, if the kappa is low, this may be because gender literacy is a learned skill, through the internalized recognition that gender is truly different from sex. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Systemic barriers and exclusionary language have excluded gender minorities from CT spaces for too long. Tools such as these, paired with standardized language for sex and gender eligibility criteria, will greatly bolster the representation of this population and spark change for a more inclusive future.

Objectives/Goals: This scoping review examines common characteristics of Community Engagement Studios, defined as custom panels bringing together community partners with lived experience around a health issue to provide highly tailored feedback to a research team. The authors also identify health service fields that most commonly use community engagement studios. Methods/Study Population: This scoping review will follow procedures outlined in the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Inclusion criteria are limited to peer reviewed manuscripts published between 2010 and 2024. Key word searches for terms related to Community Engagement Studios will be conducted within Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Experimental, quasi-experimental, observational studies, process and conceptual manuscripts published in English or Spanish meet inclusion criteria. Two reviewers will reach consensus about article inclusion. Data analysis will include content analysis and descriptive statistics. Results/Anticipated Results: The results for studies that meet inclusion criteria will be summarized through descriptive tables of study characteristics, the number of studies excluded at the full-text review stage, and reasons for the exclusion of any studies that met the initial inclusion criteria. The results will also include a summary of common elements in the design of CE studios, the health disciplines for which CE Studios are most frequently conducted, and the aspect/phase of research design for which CE Studios are most frequently requested. Discussion/Significance of Impact: To date, no work exists examining key elements of Community Engagement Studios and the fields within health services using this valuable research tool. This scoping review is a critical first step to develop guidelines, standards, and best practices around consistent procedures and characteristics to include in the design and conduct of CE Studios.

Objectives/Goals: Cervical cancer is preventable through HPV vaccination and the detection/removal of precancerous lesions. Incidence and mortality rates have only decreased by 3–4% in the past decade. Despite having the tools to prevent all cervical cancers, they are not being fully utilized. Our goal is to identify barriers and design strategies to overcome them. Methods/Study Population: Women in urban (750) and rural (750) settings will be screened for the presence of high-oncogenic risk HPV (hrHPV) by self-vaginal swab, complete the Monitoring Blunting Style Scale, a validation scale to determine attentional style, and a structural barrier to care survey. A subset (Results/Anticipated Results: The study, launched in September 2024 at the Medicine Primary Care Clinic at UMC in New Orleans, has enrolled 16 women. Sample adequacy was high (82%), with 5 women having hrHPV present. Participants expressed high satisfaction and acceptance of the self-administered vaginal swab, with most samples demonstrating high quality. Surveys have been collected, and hrHPV-positive women have been referred for gynecological follow-up. Shreveport site will recruit women across over 20 rural clinical sites using a Mobile Health Unit to increase access in rural and underserved communities. Discussion/Significance of Impact: The baseline study will take 12–18 months. We will identify and address key barriers to follow-up gynecological care, including logistical issues (improving access and navigation), educational needs (developing culturally sensitive materials), and emotional support. We will create a care delivery model to eliminate cervical cancer in Louisiana.