Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-j6k2s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-26T22:30:04.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Further Reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2025

Anthony J. Girasoli
Anthony J. Girasoli
Affiliation:
Eastern Connecticut State University
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Research Methods and Applied Statistics
A Practical Guide to Conducting Research
 , pp. 526 - 528
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Further Reading

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association 2020: The official guide to APA style (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R.A. (2014). When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 34(5), 502–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Boneau, C.A. (1960). The effects of violations of assumptions underlying the t test. Psychological Bulletin, 57(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, S.A., Dimova, R., Giguére, B., Spence, J.R., & Stanley, D.J. (2019). Failing Grade: 89% of Introduction-to-Psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
College Board (2022). K-12 educator brief: The college and career readiness benchmarks for the SAT suite of assessments. The College Board. https://satsuite.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/educator-benchmark-brief.pdfGoogle Scholar
Conover, W.J. (1974). Some reasons for not using the Yates continuity correction on 2×2 contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69(346), 374–376. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1974.10482957Google Scholar
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Winter, J.C.F. (2013). Using the Student’s t-test with extremely small sample sizes. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 18(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7275/e4r6-dj05Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F.Y. (1885). Methods of statistics. Journal of the Statistical Society of London, Jubilee Volume, 181–217.Google Scholar
Field, A.P., & Miles, J. (2010). Discovering statistics using SAS: (and sex and drugs and rock n roll). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Fritz, C.O., Morris, P.E., & Richler, J.J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 2–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gable, R.K., & Wolf, M.B. (1993). Instrument development in the affective domain: Measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings (2nd ed.). Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girden, E.R. (1992). ANOVA: Repeated measures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, L.R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, M., & Pearson, K. (1949). Dictionary of national biography, 1931–1940. London: Geoffrey Cumberlege, pp. 681–684.Google Scholar
Hartwig, F., & Dearing, B.E. (1979). Exploratory data analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemphill, J.F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitude of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 78–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, e124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, D.R., & Creech, J.C. (1983). Ordinal measures in multiple indicator models: A simulation study of categorization error. American Sociological Review, 48, 398–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, W.H. (1960). Some remarks on wild observations. Technometrics, 2,1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levene, H. (1960). In Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling, Olkin, I. et al. eds, Stanford University Press, pp. 278–292.Google Scholar
Lumley, T., Diehr, P., Emerson, S., & Chen, L. (2002). The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 151–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, H.B. & Whitney, D.R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R.A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., and Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 156–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orr, J.M., Sackett, P.R., & DuBois, C.L.Z. (1991). Outlier detection and treatment in I/O psychology: A survey of researcher beliefs and an empirical illustration. Personnel Psychology, 44, 473–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, J. (2002). Notes on the use of data transformations. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation,8(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7275/4vng-5608Google Scholar
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Razali, N. M., & Yap, B. W. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro–Wilk, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson–Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33.Google Scholar
Rodgers, J.L., & Nicewander, W.L. (1988). Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician, 42, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmider, E., Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Beyer, L., & Bühner, M. (2010). Is it really rubust? Reinvestigating the robustness of ANOVA against violations of the normal distribution assumption. Methodology, 6(4), 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S.S. and Wilk, M.B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika, 52, 591–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrout, P.E., & Rodgers, J.L., Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crises. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 487–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, J.P., Nelson, L.D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Welch, B.L. (1951) On the comparison of several mean values: an alternative approach. Biometrika, 38 (3-4), 330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westrick, P.A., Marini, J.P., Young, L., Ng, H., Shmueli, D., & Shaw, E. Validity of the SAT for predicting first-year grades and retention to the second year. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334262776_Validity_of_the_SATR_for_Predicting_First-Year_Grades_and_Retention_to_the_Second_YearGoogle Scholar
Zumbo, B.D., & Zimmerman, D.W. (1993). Is the selection of statistical methods governed by level of measurement? Canadian Psychology, 34, 390–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Further Reading
  • Anthony J. Girasoli, Eastern Connecticut State University
  • Book: Research Methods and Applied Statistics
  • Online publication: 17 December 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009361422.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Further Reading
  • Anthony J. Girasoli, Eastern Connecticut State University
  • Book: Research Methods and Applied Statistics
  • Online publication: 17 December 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009361422.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Further Reading
  • Anthony J. Girasoli, Eastern Connecticut State University
  • Book: Research Methods and Applied Statistics
  • Online publication: 17 December 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009361422.016
Available formats
×