Youth who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, and other diverse sexual and gender identities (LGBTQ+) experience disproportionately high rates of suicidal thoughts and behaviors compared to heterosexual and cisgender peers, yet many face barriers to care. Data came from a national online survey of 18,663 LGBTQ+ youth aged 13–24 years in the United States (September–December 2023). Analyses focused on participants who reported wanting mental health care in the past year and assessed access, barriers, service modalities and suicidal ideation/attempts. Half of LGBTQ+ youth who wanted mental health care did not receive it. The most common barrier was fear of talking about mental health concerns (42%). Among those who received care, one-on-one therapy was most common (69% in-person and 53% online). Suicidal ideation was lower among youth in therapy (46% in-person and 40% online) compared to those using crisis lines (75%). After adjusting for demographics, hotline use remained strongly associated with elevated risk: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.77 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.11–4.56) for suicidal ideation; aOR = 3.21 (95% CI: 2.62–3.94) for attempts. Despite strong willingness to seek care, structural and identity-related barriers leave many needs unmet. Expanding culturally competent services is essential to reducing suicide risk.

Under standard care, psychotic disorders can have limited response to treatments, high rates of chronicity and disability, negative impacts on families, and wider social and economic costs. In an effort to improve early detection and care of individuals developing a psychotic illness, early intervention in psychosis services and early detection services have been set up in various countries since the 1980s. In April 2016, NHS England implemented a new ‘access and waiting times’ standard for early intervention in psychosis to extend the prevention of psychosis across England. Unfortunately, early intervention and early detection services are still not uniformly distributed in the UK, leaving gaps in service provision. The aim of this paper is to provide a business case model that can guide clinicians and services looking to set up or expand early detection services in their area. The paper also focuses on some existing models of care within the Pan-London Network for Psychosis Prevention teams.

Serenity Integrated Mentoring (SIM) involved the police and mental health crisis services working in a single team, developing case management plans that allowed a seamless move from offers of therapeutic engagement (by the mental health team) to use of coercive measures (by the police) with those who persisted with frequent crisis presentations. Withdrawn after widespread criticism, the scheme raises important questions – about the practice of mental health professionals who are involved in decisions about using criminal sanctions for people presenting in crisis, about the ethical and legal status of the sharing of confidential clinical information with the police, and about the processes that professional bodies use in promoting, monitoring and responding to controversial service developments.