To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The increase in the observational network and data assimilation, linked with advancements in the computational area in recent years, has led to important new findings in the meteorology and climatology of South America. Hence, here is presented a literature review that begins describing the various annual cycles of precipitation and air temperature observed across South America, highlighting two contrasting areas: the Atacama Desert, the driest place on Earth, and western Colombia, one of the wettest regions in the world. Next, we present the low- and upper-level atmospheric circulation patterns that control the continent’s diverse climates, with an emphasis on the development of the South American Monsoon System. The review also covers the major atmospheric systems affecting the continent at different temporal and spatial scales, such as the Intertropical Convergence Zone, the South Atlantic Convergence Zone, low-level jets, fronts, synoptic-scale cyclones, and mesoscale convective systems. In addition, the climate variability and main teleconnection patterns that affect South America, as well as the climate models’ present-day performance and their future climate projections for the end of the century, are addressed. We conclude by identifying some of the current gaps and discussing future research challenges within the context of South American weather and climate.
Chapter 1 provides an overview of the main features of the general circulation and climate dynamics of the Southern Hemisphere troposphere, including the role of weather systems. The aim of the chapter is to explain, in broad terms, the physical mechanisms shaping Southern Hemisphere tropospheric climate. Many treatments of the atmospheric general circulation place a strong emphasis on the governing equations, as expressed in terms of budgets and fluxes, which invariably leads to an emphasis on the zonal mean. Chapter 1 takes a complementary and more phenomenological perspective starting from regional climatic features. This aligns with the current interest in understanding regional aspects of climate change and provides a foundation for other chapters in the monograph. The chapter begins by describing these regional climatic features through spatial maps of key dynamical fields. It then explains those features in terms of phenomena anchored in dynamical theory, such as monsoon circulations and storm tracks, including their zonal asymmetries. The discussion covers tropical, subtropical, and extratropical tropospheric phenomena and the connections between them. The chapter concludes with a brief discussion of how the regional phenomena discussed here are expected to respond to climate change.
The 2025 International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change constitutes a diligent and reasoned exposition of the main bodies of international law on climate change. The Court read this law harmoniously and clearly identified States’ obligations as well as the legal consequences of breach. Under both treaty and customary international law, States must act with due diligence and do their utmost to mitigate climate change, including through action on fossil fuel production and consumption. The Court confirmed that the law of State responsibility applies if States fail to fulfil their obligations, and sketches a pathway for establishing causation of harm that would become relevant if reparation were sought.
This article examines the key dimensions of the Advisory Opinion, including the applicable law identified by the Court and its analysis of State responsibility, informing readers of the Court’s main findings and their consequences. It also puts forward a few reflections, including on the Advisory Opinion’s emphasis on international cooperation and finance flows, the Court’s views on sea-level rise and self-determination, the role of science in the Advisory Opinion and what the Court left for the future.
Language models (LMs) have attracted the attention of researchers from the natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) communities working in specialized domains, including climate change. NLP and ML practitioners have been making efforts to reap the benefits of LMs of various sizes, including large language models, in order to both simplify and accelerate the processing of large collections of text data, and in doing so, help climate change stakeholders to gain a better understanding of past and current climate-related developments, thereby staying on top of both ongoing changes and increasing amounts of data. This paper presents a brief history of language models and ties LMs’ beginnings to them becoming an emerging technology for analysing and interacting with texts in the specialized domain of climate change. The paper reviews existing domain-specific LMs and systems based on general-purpose large language models for analysing climate change data, with special attention being paid to the LMs’ and LM-based systems’ functionalities, intended use and audience, architecture, the data used in their development, the applied evaluation methods, and their accessibility. The paper concludes with a brief overview of potential avenues for future research vis-à-vis the advantages and disadvantages of deploying LMs and LM-based solutions in a high-stakes scenario such as climate change research. For the convenience of readers, explanations of specialized terms used in NLP and ML are provided.
The entangled relations of humanity’s natural and digital ecosystems are discussed in terms of the risk-uncertainty conundrum. The discussion focuses on global warming from the perspective of the small world of geoengineering, with a particular focus on geothermal energy, marine geoengineering, and the political economy of mitigation and adaptation (section 1). It inquires into the large world of the biosphere, Anthropocene, and uncertainties created by the overlay of human and geological time (section 2). And it scrutinizes the technosphere, consciousness, and language as humanity’s arguably most important cultural technology (section 3).
In an era of interconnected crises – from climate change to biodiversity loss – transformative solutions require collaboration at scale. This chapter explores how public-private-philanthropic partnerships (4Ps) can unlock new funding models, amplify impact, and drive systemic change. It introduces pooled funds as a game-changing approach, demonstrating how aggregating resources across sectors can mobilize capital for high-impact initiatives.
Through compelling case studies, the chapter illustrates how aligned interests between businesses, governments, and philanthropy can catalyze sustainable development – from empowering smallholder farmers to financing global land restoration efforts. It also confronts the challenges hindering 4Ps from reaching their full potential and offers actionable strategies for overcoming them.
The world is racing against time to finance the transition to a low-carbon economy, yet less than 2% of global philanthropic capital is directed toward climate solutions. Meanwhile, institutional investors control trillions in assets but hesitate to fund green infrastructure in emerging markets, citing high risks and fragmented markets.
This chapter presents the Green Development and Investment Accelerator (GDIA) – a bold new mechanism that leverages philanthropy to de-risk investment opportunities, lower capital costs, and mobilize large-scale private finance for climate action. By integrating philanthropy into a structured five-step de-risking process, GDIA aims to align policies, optimize sectoral coordination, and scale investible projects for institutional investors. A call to action for foundations, policymakers, and private investors, this chapter argues that philanthropy’s greatest impact lies not just in grants, but in unlocking billions for climate finance.
Water security in Latin America is at a tipping point – despite holding 30% of the world’s freshwater, millions lack access to safe drinking water. Enter the Latin American Water Funds Partnership (LAWFP), a groundbreaking model of radical collaboration that unites governments, businesses, nonprofits, and philanthropy to drive systemic change in water security.
This chapter explores how Water Funds pool financial and technical resources, implement nature-based solutions, and foster cross-sector partnerships to deliver long-term, scalable impact. With over 26 Water Funds engaging 340+ organizations, LAWFP has protected over 565,000 hectares of watersheds, improved water access, and strengthened community resilience. A compelling case study in multi-sector cooperation, this chapter demonstrates how philanthropic capital can act as a catalyst for innovation, unlocking sustainable financing to combat climate change and transform water security.
Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) hold one-third of the world’s biodiversity, yet climate change and deforestation threaten this vital ecological powerhouse. Despite the urgency, nature-based solutions (NBS) receive a fraction of global climate finance, while billions flow into environmentally harmful subsidies.
This chapter explores how philanthropy can help bridge the gap and reshape conservation finance by funding high-impact, scalable solutions that protect ecosystems, empower communities, and drive economic transformation. Through case studies of leading philanthropic initiatives – Arapyaú Institute in Brazil, Moisés Bertoni Foundation in Paraguay, and Grupo Argos in Colombia – it demonstrates how strategic investments in forest restoration, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable land use can accelerate climate mitigation and adaptation.
Lukács engaged in a series of exchanges with his contemporaries on the Left, including Bloch and Brecht, in which he defended realism as the only valid form of the novel, and they promoted modernism. This debate helps us to see the value and the limitations of the realist form and the need for other forms of fictional narrative. The representation of the future under climate change would seem to be something beyond realism’s grasp because such a radically different world is by definition far outside the quotidian. And yet, climate change is itself a reality that fiction would seem to be obliged to address. in The Great Derangement (2016), Amitav Ghosh tries to explain why fiction has failed to address the problem of climate change, and he blames the novel as a form. Ghosh wants fiction that embodies a posthumanist perspective, but the novel form is dependent on human agency. A variety of novels address climate change, and most combine realism with other narrative modes. Realism is needed in order to make these novels persuasive, though it is unlikely, given the current reach of print fiction, that a climate novel will have the inpact that Uncle Tom’s Cabin once did.
Nature-based solutions (NbSs) are increasingly recognised for their potential to address climate change and biodiversity loss, but their role in mitigating antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remains underexplored. AMR and climate change share environmental drivers, such as pollution, ecosystem degradation, and industrial agriculture, yet responses often remain fragmented and technocratic. This paper draws on a global roundtable series convened under the British Academy’s “Just Transitions for AMR” initiative to explore how NbS can support more just, equitable, and integrated responses to these intersecting crises. Bringing together 46 experts from public health, environmental science, agriculture, governance, and social sciences, the roundtables facilitated interdisciplinary exchange across Africa, Asia, and Europe. The paper synthesises insights across four thematic areas: conceptualising Just Transitions in NbS, identifying co-benefits for scaling NbS for climate and AMR mitigation, addressing implementation barriers, and proposing future directions. Findings emphasise the need to reframe NbS as socially embedded practices co-designed with communities, rather than as technical fixes. Participants called for investment in place-based approaches, participatory monitoring, and governance structures promoting inclusion. The paper concludes by aligning NbS with One Health and Just Transition principles, urging a shift from isolated interventions to systems-oriented transformations that redress power imbalances in environmental and health governance.
To anticipate relationships between future climate change and societal violence, we need theory to establish causal links and case studies to estimate interactions between driving forces. Here, we couple evolutionary ecology with a machine-learning statistical approach to investigate the long-term effects of climate change, population growth, and inequality on intergroup conflict among farmers in the North American Southwest. Through field investigations, we generate a new archaeological dataset of farming settlements in the Bears Ears National Monument spanning 1,300 years (0 to AD 1300) to evaluate the direct and interactive effects of precipitation, temperature, climate shocks, demography, and wealth inequality on habitation site defensibility—our proxy for intergroup conflict. We find that conflict peaked during dry, warm intervals when population density and inequality were highest. Results support our theoretical predictions and suggest cascading effects, whereby xeric conditions favored population aggregation into an increasingly small, heterogenous area, which increased resource stress and inequality and promoted intergroup conflict over limited productive patches. This dynamic likely initiated feedback loops, whereby conflict exacerbated shortfalls and fostered mistrust, which drove further aggregation and competition. Results reveal complex interactions among socioclimatological conditions, all of which may have contributed to regional depopulation during the thirteenth century AD.
The population status of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) on the Antarctic Peninsula highlights opportunities for the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) to address uncertainty more directly and effectively in its conservation efforts. The heightened uncertainty posed by climate change is testing CCAMLR’s commitment to balancing science and international cooperation in decision-making. Uncertainty underpins some of the justification to postpone reaching a consensus on the establishment of Marine Protected Areas, leaving Adélie penguins vulnerable to change. Two key opportunities to adapt current management approaches emerge: 1) reduce uncertainty by systematically identifying knowledge gaps within CCAMLR’s processes; and 2) integrate uncertainty more explicitly into decisions through a standardized approach to assessing and communicating it.
We describe the main insights from the papers included in this special issue, Challenges for the Development of Latin America in the Anthropocene: Current Research in Environmental Economics. The contributions are organized around three themes: the economic and welfare impacts of temperature variability, the role of institutions and user rights in shaping environmental governance and the effectiveness of regulatory instruments for managing ambient and atmospheric pollution. Together, these papers show that environmental outcomes in Latin America are deeply shaped by institutional capacity, governance quality and social inequality. By combining rigorous empirical analysis with attention to local contexts, they demonstrate how environmental economics can inform policy responses to the triple planetary crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution.
Despite repeated calls for action from various sources, peatland archaeological sites continue to deteriorate; the passive strategy of preservation in situ is failing. Here, the authors consider four challenges to peatland preservation—physical degradation, mapping and monitoring of sites, communication, and policy frameworks—with climate change ultimately causing further problems. Drawing on positive policy developments in England, they argue that advocacy for peatland archaeology needs to be louder and clearer: archaeology must become an integral consideration in all climate-change mitigation and land-use planning, rather than an afterthought, if the fragile heritage of European peatlands is to be preserved.
Climate change is an important existential issue for our time. This book is an anthology of readings about climate change science. The rationale for writing this book is that some universities are now beginning to require all undergraduate students to take an approved climate change course. The book is for students who may lack strong mathematical backgrounds or may not have taken some science courses. It also for the general reader who wants to understand climate change science. The book has no equations and no technical jargon and no complex charts or graphs. Anyone who can read a newspaper can read this book. The book explains how the climate change issue has developed over many decades, how the science has progressed, how diplomacy has proven unable to find a means of limiting global emissions of heat-trapping substances such as carbon dioxide created by burning fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas), and how the forecast of the resulting climate change has become more worrisome.
The urgency of acting to limit climate change has nothing to do with politics or economics. Instead, it arises directly from the physics and chemistry of the climate system. Carbon dioxide, once it is added to the atmosphere, will remain there a long time. Some of it will remain in the atmosphere for centuries until natural processes remove it. Thus, it will be there essentially forever, if we think in terms of the implications on human time scales. The only known way to prevent atmospheric carbon dioxide amounts from increasing further is simply to cease emitting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. That is why acting swiftly to make large reductions in global emissions, in order to limit climate change, is urgent. Yet very little significant progress has occurred toward actually making the large cuts in global emissions of heat-trapping gases that would be needed to stabilize climate. Without drastic and rapid cuts in emissions, our children and their descendants, and ultimately all living things, will be faced with the consequences of more severe climate disruption.
Chapter 4 provides an environmental interpretation of Kant’s aesthetic and teleological theory as developed in the Critique of the Power of Judgment. To put Kant’s insights in dialogue with new contributions in climate aesthetics, I begin with Kant’s theory of the sublime. I claim that Kant’s account of the dynamical sublime has important moral and political relevance for climate philosophy despite its human-centered focus. Next, I look into Kant’s account of natural beauty, which I suggest justifies duties against environmental degradation. I also touch on Kant’s duties to love nature’s harmony and purposes in light of ecological stewardship. The chapter concludes with a look into Kantian teleology from the Critique of Judgment. I propose that teleological judgment can be used to motivate protection of non-beautiful aspects of ecosystems, especially in light of climate-related biodiversity loss.
This study presents three key steps to enable the Business and Human Rights (BHR) research agenda to promote and advance greater applicability to the emerging challenges in the field. Drawing on research conducted on BHR sources (almost exclusively by Brazilian and Spanish-speaking authors), this article aims to demonstrate the need for further BHR scholarship to simultaneously: (i) identify and remedy epistemic biases through reflexive engagement with a victim-centred scholarship from the Global South that recentres BHR research on the perspective of affected communities; (ii) move from consideration to co-production by grounding BHR theory in practice via participatory methodologies and dialogue between communities, researchers and corporations; and (iii) by aligning with steps one and two, recontextualize Human Rights Due Diligence (HRDD) research into an integrated Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence (HREDD) approach that incorporates environmental and climate dimensions and ensure meaningful, victim-centred engagement with affected communities.
The second Trump administration has disrupted global climate politics, turning the United States away from the clean energy and environmental policies of the Biden administration. Consequently, analytical attention is turning, inside and outside of the United States, to a family of concepts referred to as “Climate Realism” (CR), which favors long-run investments in technology and adaptation over near-term climate mitigation efforts. We critically engage with CR and argue that political science identifies four key features of climate politics that shed light on CR’s strengths and weaknesses, and which will persist even in the second Trump era. Despite CR’s flaws, we contend that its emergence in reaction to the second Trump administration highlights some important dimensions of climate politics that deserve greater attention going forward. We highlight three topics for research: the political and practical strategies of the anti-green coalition; the heterogeneity in viable national economic strategies; and the implications for IR of a turn away from meaningful climate mitigation in powerful nations.