Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-fnvtc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-27T14:51:49.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Global resources and the Qing empire’s war preparations in the 1874 Taiwan Incident

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2025

Nan-Hsu Chen*
Affiliation:
Department of History, National Taiwan Normal University , Taipei, Taiwan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Taiwan Incident of 1874 – a prolonged Sino-Japanese confrontation over the killing of Ryukyu castaways, whom Japan claimed as its subjects – marked the full maturation of a new mode of Qing war preparation. This mode was characterized by global coordination, domestic and international competition, and the swift mobilization of personal connections to secure foreign weapons and loans – resources that were often interconnected. Facilitated by the efforts of various actors, this internationalized approach became a standard practice during the empire’s final decades. As the empire could no longer rely on domestic self-sufficiency in arms and funding, Qing military operations came to reflect the broader influence of global military and financial resources. The Qing empire’s capacity to mobilize global resources in pursuit of national objectives helps explain its resilience in an era dominated by imperial powers.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

In October 1874, at the height of the protracted Sino-Japanese confrontation over the killing of Ryukyu castaways – whom Japan regarded as its subjects – the Qing government was engaged in a major effort to secure foreign loans. The Qing had made such attempts in earlier decades but now was seeking to borrow on a much larger scale, to the tune of several million silver taels, and to be used as payments for foreign weaponry. The Economist noted that it would be a serious development if the Qing government succeeded in securing these loans. Around this time, both the Qing government and Japan were scrambling to acquire as much state-of-the-art Euro-American weaponry, ammunition, and gunboats as possible. Footnote 1 According to the magazine, it was loan agreements, rather than the bitter exchanges between the Qing and Japan, that would determine the prospect of a devastating, full-scale war.Footnote 2

In hindsight, the Taiwan Incident represented the moment at which the key features of the Qing government’s new mode of war preparation had fully matured. Unlike the mode of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, this new mode involved what might be described as an internationalized approach. It required promptly (or even hastily) mobilizing personal connections to secure both foreign weapons and loans – two types of international resources that were often tied to each other in wartime due to the lender’s or arms dealer’s demands and the Qing’s financial constraints.Footnote 3 More than ever, access to foreign weapons and loans preoccupied the officials responsible for dealing with these conflicts. Thanks to the establishment of treaty ports in East Asia, as well as advancements in global communications and transportation technologies, and most importantly, the efforts made by various actors who facilitated war preparations in one way or another, this process became the standard procedure in all major armed conflicts in the empire’s last decades.

Markedly different in both nature and magnitude from mid-nineteenth-century precedents, the Taiwan Incident represents a critical case for analyzing the Qing’s new mode of war preparation. Evidently unprepared for Japan’s unexpected military challenge, the Qing began by negotiating its first public loan with the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) – later the foremost foreign lending bank in China – an arrangement that constituted sovereign debt.Footnote 4 Second, there was a close link between the Qing’s borrowing and weaponry: Imperial Commissioner Shen Baozhen intended to use foreign borrowings to acquire ironclads, rifles, cannon, and ammunition from abroad.Footnote 5 Third and most importantly, Qing officials were preoccupied with foreign loans and arms, which, while not replacing domestic resources, took on an unprecedented and essential role in their planning. Fortunately, the Taiwan Incident left a substantial paper trail in multiple languages, making it possible to reconstruct the processes and participants involved in this new mode of war preparation. Furthermore, the Taiwan Incident triggered a profound policy debate over maritime defense versus frontier defense, a debate that could determine whether Hunan Army commander Zuo Zongtang would be able to launch his planned campaign to reconquer modern-day Xinjiang.Footnote 6 Zuo regarded foreign loans as the solution to financing his military campaign and, tellingly, sought Shen’s assistance in contracting a ten-million tael loan – the largest borrowing ever proposed at the time – because of Shen’s experience during the Taiwan Incident.Footnote 7

The said Sino-Japanese confrontation, also known as Japan’s Expedition to Taiwan, the Mudanshe Incident, or the Taiwan Incident, refers to Japanese military operations and Chinese responses in southern Taiwan between May 6 and December 2, 1874. The incident was sparked when fifty-four Ryukyu castaways were killed by Taiwanese “aborigines” (fan 番) in 1871. Three years later, Japan retaliated by sending troops to southern Taiwan, reportedly in the name of justice, but with long-term colonization in mind.Footnote 8 The incident can be understood as part of Japan’s broader policy to incorporate Ryukyu fully into its polity, transforming the islanders into Japanese subjects and ending Ryukyu’s ambiguous dual submission to both the Qing and Japan.Footnote 9 In southern Taiwan, the Qing’s territorial claim did not conform to Euro-American notions of sovereignty, since the claim was not backed by substantial political and military presence in the region.Footnote 10 Throughout the year, the Qing and Japan continued diplomatic negotiations but simultaneously made extensive war preparations. War as a solution was never completely off the table.

While scholarship on the Taiwan Incident is vast, substantial treatment of key activities of war preparations, such as lending and arms trade, is surprisingly rare, let alone connecting these separate topics to a wider trend.Footnote 11 Historians who have studied the actual processes of Chinese and Japanese military operations, diplomatic negotiations, and the event’s long-term consequences for international relations and the Qing’s late-nineteenth-century modernization efforts have generally focused on the roles played by prominent Chinese, Japanese, or Euro-American statesmen and diplomats, making only passing reference to the activities of non-political actors such as merchants or civilians. Other recent scholarship has centered the experiences of non-political actors including the Indigenous peoples, merchants, and civilians but does so in the context of the local rather than the international. This article takes a different tack: by focusing on the Qing’s preparations for war in 1874 and the full range of participants involved, this article shows the emergence of a new mode of war preparation in the Qing.Footnote 12

In a world dominated by imperial powers, the Qing empire’s resilience can be partly attributed to its new mode of war preparation. Stephen R. Halsey has persuasively theorized this resilience as the result of a highly successful Chinese military-fiscal state. I argue that foreign loans and weapons were essential components of this effective state-making. The key lies in what Halsey termed the Qing’s “mediated economy,” which preserved a measure of economic autonomy. This condition, I suggest, enabled the empire to capitalize on foreign loans and arms sales while avoiding formal colonization.Footnote 13

In the first section, I will trace the development of the Qing’s new mode of war preparation from the mid-nineteenth century onward. Using the Taiwan Incident of 1874 as an example, I will examine in the second and third sections the two interconnected activities of this process: securing foreign weapons and loans and how the Qing obtained these critical military and financial resources. Although these wartime transactions were often kept secret from the public, I will explore the roles played by various individuals and institutions that facilitated these transactions as much as possible. The fourth section highlights one specific problem connected with this new pattern of war preparation: the competition for limited resources on the global market. Taken together, these examples demonstrate that Qing war preparations in the 1870s were global in nature and reliant on connections, coordination, and competition.

Historical context

The new mode of war preparation was connected to global mass production in the nineteenth century, even though the sale of arms had existed for centuries: Since the sixteenth century, firearms manufactured in Europe flowed legally and illegally between European countries and their overseas colonies in Africa, America, and Asia. Portugal, the Netherlands, and later Britain were major sources of arms sold internationally. Arms were used to exchange for local commodities such as slaves and fur.Footnote 14 In contrast, the Taiwan Incident occurred during a period of mass production and expanded trade in firearms. Between the 1850s and 1880s, major advances in firearms technology, most significantly interchangeable parts and machine tool precision, were adopted in firearm production. At the same time, Western countries were transitioning from muzzle-loading to breech-loading rifles, rendering many rifles outdated. These developments created a global market for non-Western countries to obtain weapons in bulk.Footnote 15 Major manufacturers in the United States, Germany, and Britain eagerly sought overseas markets for their surplus due to increased production capacity and fluctuating domestic demands. The Ottoman Empire was the largest consumer, but the Qing also had huge demands for weapons, especially during wartime. Arms traffic was largely unrestricted until the 1880s. At that time, Britain, France, and Italy made the first attempts to restrict the flow of weapons, with limited success. On this issue, metropolitan companies and colonial officials had competing interests, and different countries vied for overseas markets. These conflicts of interest rendered arms control ineffective.

As late as the mid-seventeenth century, the Qing empire and Western Europe were comparable in terms of weaponry technology. This was partly due to the Qing’s adoption and improvement of military technology developed in Western Europe. However, Chinese firearms did not substantially improve afterward – possibly, as Peter C. Perdue has suggested, because of the Qing’s successful conquest of its long-time rival, the Zunghar Mongol state, in 1760Footnote 16 – and by the nineteenth century, Western military technologies were far superior. This was not an immediate concern, as the Qing Empire was not seriously challenged militarily in East Asia before the mid-nineteenth century.Footnote 17

For the most part, the Qing’s war preparations in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries were domestically based. Weapons were state-manufactured – produced by the Ministry of Works, provincial authorities, or local counties near the frontlines.Footnote 18 Likewise, wars were funded solely through domestic financial resources, particularly government revenues. In fact, eighteenth-century China operated on the principle that only revenues – not loans – should be used to finance warfare.Footnote 19 As the state’s fiscal condition deteriorated, especially from the early nineteenth century onward, Qing society increasingly shouldered a greater share of military expenditures.Footnote 20 As economic historian Ghassan Moazzin has pointed out, the Qing lacked the institutional infrastructure to mobilize large sums of capital for major projects and wartime needs; foreign banks only began to meet such demands in the latter half of the nineteenth century.Footnote 21

This began to change during the suppression of the Taiping War in the 1850s and 1860s as the Qing began to explore international purchasing and borrowing for the first time.Footnote 22 Senior officials across the Qing empire increasingly agreed on the necessity of adopting superior Western weaponry.Footnote 23 Notably, Li Hongzhang began to extensively equip his army with such arms.Footnote 24 In this era, Qing authorities began to take out foreign loans. Most of these early borrowings were under one million silver taels, in stark contrast to the much larger sums – each amounting to several million – borrowed for subsequent wars.Footnote 25

Military emergencies brought on by the Taiping War prompted Qing officials to solicit or accept military assistance from foreign powers, including direct British and French military intervention, the employment of foreign officers, and the provision of training and arms.Footnote 26 However, key regional and central officials – most notably Zeng Guofan and Li Hongzhang – remained wary of such involvement in the Qing’s military affairs. Zeng feared that foreign intervention could allow foreign troops to gain a foothold in the Qing.Footnote 27 Li, for his part, aimed to keep military affairs firmly under control – that is, to arm Qing troops with imported weapons and upgrade the Qing’s overall military capabilities without allowing foreigners to exert influence over military operations or decision-making.Footnote 28

As a growing number of officials came to view the adoption of advanced foreign arms as an urgent priority, two main approaches to acquiring such weapons emerged: domestic production and international purchases.Footnote 29 To reduce the empire’s dependence on foreign suppliers, Qing officials promoted domestic production.Footnote 30 At the core of these efforts was the goal of military self-reliance – a position strongly held by Li Hongzhang, even though his Huai Army made extensive use of foreign arms and accepted other forms of military assistance.Footnote 31

To achieve military self-reliance, Qing officials established arsenals to domestically manufacture arms and ammunition by reverse-engineering Western military technology. However, as Wang Ermin pointed out, domestic production was costly, inferior in quality, and insufficient in scale.Footnote 32 Tellingly, in the early 1870s, Li Hongzhang refused to equip his army with substandard, domestically produced breech-loading rifles.Footnote 33 During the Sino-Japanese War of 1894 – 1895, “the provincial arsenals proved to be a great disappointment…so as usual the government was forced to purchase arms from foreign firms.”Footnote 34 In short, despite the growth of domestic production, large-scale international purchases continued, and imported weapons were used in all major battles throughout the second half of the nineteenth century.Footnote 35 It was against this backdrop that the international mode of war preparation developed in parallel with domestic efforts.

In the post-Taiping era, the Qing empire increasingly relied on foreign arms and loans in its major military operations. In the 1860s, foreign arms and loans began to play an increasingly significant role in Zuo Zongtang’s military campaigns in the northwestern regions of the Qing.Footnote 36 The mid-1870s marked the full maturation of the new mode of war preparation and the consolidation of Qing frontiers. The Taiwan Incident and Zuo Zongtang’s expedition to modern-day Xinjiang were both major military operations in which Qing officials were heavily preoccupied with large-scale foreign arms deals and loans. Both military events demonstrated to officials that domestic arms production alone was insufficient to meet the empire’s military demands and that foreign arms and loans would be needed.Footnote 37 From the court’s perspective, this reliance on foreign resources marked a significant concession, undermining its longstanding preference for military self-reliance.

Regarding foreign loans, in 1874, the court approved the two largest-ever foreign loans requested by Shen Baozhen and Zuo Zongtang – Shen’s for the defense of Taiwan and Zuo’s for the reconquest of modern-day Xinjiang. Zuo was authorized to borrow three million silver taels; two years later, he requested an additional ten million, of which five million was ultimately approved.Footnote 38 In the 1870s and 1880s, Zuo secured foreign loans totaling more than fourteen million to finance his military campaigns across various parts of the empire. And the pattern continued: During the Sino-French War of 1884 – 1885, the Qing borrowed at least eighteen million, and in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894 – 1895, that figure rose to forty million.Footnote 39 Both wars marked periods in which the procurement of arms was carried out with exceptional urgency.Footnote 40

In summary, during the 1850s and 1860s, the Qing began its use of foreign loans and arms – albeit on a modest scale – in its military confrontations with Taiping forces. Although most political elites continued to advocate for military self-reliance, the two major military events of the 1870s – the Taiwan Incident and the reconquest of Xinjiang – demonstrated that global resources had become indispensable to the Qing in times of crisis. This new mode of war preparation recurred throughout the final decades of the empire, operating in parallel with a growing effort to promote domestic arms production.

Purchasing weapons

The Qing empire’s mobilization of its army during the Taiwan Incident highlights the empire’s emphasis on superior Western armaments. Alarmed at the landing of the Japanese troops in southern Taiwan, the Qing began to mobilize its crack troops for an imminent war.Footnote 41 At the suggestion of Li Hongzhang, the court agreed to dispatch the commander Tang Dingkui and his army to Taiwan, totaling 6,500 troops. Another 3,500 men from another province could be mobilized when needed, although in the end this did not happen.Footnote 42 Tang’s army was one of the best in the Huai Army, which distinguished itself from many other troops in the Qing by its adoption of foreign weapons, including cannons and rifles, beginning in the 1860s.Footnote 43 By the 1870s, Tang’s troops had participated in the pacification of the Taiping and Nian rebels.Footnote 44

Early on, state-of-the-art breech-loading rifles were highly desired by the Qing (and Japan), as a breech-loading rifle could be fired four time faster than its muzzle-loading counterpart.Footnote 45 Although Tang’s troops were among the rare Chinese troops equipped with advanced firearms, these weapons were not the latest breech-loading but dated muzzle-loading rifles. Even worse, those forces guarding Taiwan before Tang’s arrival, including Taiwan’s standing army and troops from mainland Fujian, used even more inferior weapons such as matchlocks.Footnote 46 As for officially recruited Taiwanese braves, they used bows, arrows, and spears.Footnote 47

Several factors prevented even the Qing’s best troops from upgrading their firearms. The first factor was the lack of a reason that can justify the costs. Li Hongzhang was probably second to none among Qing officials when it came to military reforms in a Euro-American fashion. However, even Li, likely out of financial constraints, did not widely equip the Huai Army with the advanced breech-loading rifles. Li stated that no immediate threats justified the use of this kind of weapons.Footnote 48 Most orders of advanced arms were thus placed only when the Qing was making preparations for imminent war. Second, in terms of state-of-the-art rifles, the Qing’s manufacturing capability was still limited. Jiangnan Arsenal, the flagship arsenal of the empire, only produced 65,300 rifles between the 1860s and the 1900s.Footnote 49 Third, these domestic products were of inferior quality.Footnote 50 Even Li’s army refused to use domestically made breech-loaders.

Fortunately for Li and Shen Baozhen, firearms and other weapons were generally available on the global market, although temporary surges in demand caused difficulties for large orders. In the mid-nineteenth century, the arms industry boosted its production exponentially through industrial mass production. The result was large quantities of firearms for sale. In the United States, the Civil War led to a strong demand for weapons. However, the domestic market plummeted following the end of the war, and many arms producers went bankrupt. Among more than two hundred arms producers in the middle of the century, only one out of ten survived at the century’s end. One key survival strategy was to find overseas markets. In this regard, the US government posed no obstacle. Before the twentieth century, “the freedom of private arms exports” was in general, not only unrestricted but also respected by the government.Footnote 51

Global operations and the flow of weapons

The Qing empire’s purchases and shipments of weapons manufactured in Western countries demonstrate that the new mode of war preparation was made possible by global operations and cooperation. Early on, connections with foreigners were conducive to the Qing’s military purchases. In June 1874, only a few weeks after Japan’s incursion into southern Taiwan, Shen requested permission to purchase 15,000 Remington rifles, the famous breech-loaders made by the Remington company based in New York.Footnote 52 Shen’s request was in fact at the advice of Prosper Giquel, a French consultant who worked for the Qing at the Foochow (Fuzhou) Arsenal and was vital for the construction of a naval dockyard and fleet. Shen highly – some said excessively – trusted foreign experts working for the Qing, for which he attracted criticism from his colleagues.Footnote 53 It was no exception when it came to arms sales. Shen entrusted Giquel with making the purchases that Giquel himself recommended to Shen.

While it is unknown exactly how Giquel purchased the Remington rifles for the Qing, his efforts to obtain ironclads show his role as middleman. Although Giquel was French, he had had conflicts with the French Minister in Beijing and instead contacted Thomas Francis Wade, the British Minister to the Qing.Footnote 54 According to Shen, Giquel emphasized the importance of asking foreign ambassadors to act as middlemen for the Qing’s military purchases. These diplomats would assist with securing vessels of good quality at low prices. Agreeing with Giquel, Shen attempted to convince Li Hongzhang and the Zongli Yamen of Giquel’s opinion.Footnote 55

Giquel proved to be a capable agent, successfully finding Remington rifles for Shen. According to Giquel’s report, each Remington rifle, along with 400 bullets (yaozi 藥子), was priced at thirty-one silver taels.Footnote 56 In the end, Giquel was only able to order 6,000 Remington rifles due to limited availability. These rifles were expected to be delivered in September.Footnote 57 The exact date of the delivery is unknown, but the rifles certainly arrived in the Qing before December.Footnote 58

The departure of large quantities of Remington rifles and other weapons from Europe to the Qing was noticed by European newspapers. On September 7, The Times (London) intercepted intelligence on the arrival of six thousand Remington rifles in France, probably originally from the United States. According to the newspaper article, the intelligence was “emanating from an authentic source” and had “a precision which adds to its credibility.” The description shows that the goods, including five to six thousand rifles, ammunition, cannons, and even a battery, were transported between several places in Germany, France, and Britain, before heading for Fuzhou and Shanghai in early September.Footnote 59

The Marseilles packet of the 31st of August conveyed 68 chests of Remington rifles, 1,300 in all. These rifles come from the entrepôt of Cherbourg, and were destined for Shanghai. A battery of six pieces Montagne [Montagne cannons] has just been despatched from Germany, via Belfort, for Foochow. It will be embarked at Marseilles on the packet of the 6th. The Messageries Company having refused to take 4,000,000 cartridges from Cherbourg, Mr. Morris, of the Boulevard des Capucines, offered a Havre steamer which would embark at Cherbourg 5,000 to 6,000 Remington rifles and 5,000,000 cartridges. The steamer is now loading at Havre, whence it will proceed to London to take in a cargo of arms and military equipment. Other Montagne cannons will shortly be despatched. The wheels and gun-carriages will be sent from France, and are all in readiness, their destination being Foochow and Shanghai. A German is at the head of these operations.Footnote 60

The identity of the German person “at the head” of this global operation was unknown. Nevertheless, as the timing, destination, and quantity of these shipments matched Shen’s order, the rifles and other weapons mentioned in the quoted newspaper article were most likely the rifles ordered by Shen through Giquel. It is clear that this transaction involved multiple actors from many countries – it was a truly global endeavor.

While it is difficult to trace the rifles once they departed from Europe, we do know of a domestic transportation of 560 German-made Snider breech-loading rifles (Tunaide qiang 土乃得鎗) and their ammunition inside the Qing. In early August, Li purchased 560 Snider rifles and transferred them to Tang Dingkui’s troops that were being dispatched to Taiwan. At this moment, the Remington rifles that Shen ordered had not yet arrived, and Shen thus asked Li to lend them the Snider rifles. The Snider rifles were probably purchased by the Shanghai Weaponry Purchase Bureau (Shanghai caiban junhuo ju 上海採辦軍火局).Footnote 61 This kind of bureau proliferated during the Taiping War (1850 – 1864), as Qing officials strove to maintain the function of local governments when much of the territory in central and southern China was under Taiping occupation.Footnote 62

The rifles, along with 211,400 bullets, were shipped to Taiwan under the arrangements made by Sheng Xuanhuai, the renowned merchant and a founding member of the China Merchants Steam Navigation Company. At this time, this young man – he was only thirty – was entrusted by Li Hongzhang with the logistics of transporting Qing armies and resources to Taiwan. Apparently, Sheng’s managerial skills were recognized and valued. Sheng used the steamer Liyun to ship the Snider rifles, which Tang received in early September.Footnote 63 This was the first time that Tang’s army was equipped with a significant number of breech-loading rifles. Although the rifles were successfully delivered, thirteen boxes of ammunition were missing. It was reported that these boxes had been placed beneath the coal on the steamer and could not be retrieved until the vessel’s next visit to Taiwan. To be on the safe side, Tang informed Sheng of the incident (which in fact helped create the paper trail documenting the transfer).

Gunpowder was imported for the defense of Taiwan as well. By the time the Snider and later the Remington rifles arrived in Taiwan, a large quantity of gunpowder had been obtained. On July 18, the Qing purchased 80,000 pounds of gunpowder somewhere near Hong Kong. The gunpowder was transported to Taiwan and then stored in a magazine newly built on the summit of Fort Zeelandia in the town of Anping.Footnote 64 Anticipating the arrival of many military supplies, including firearms, guns, and related components and supplies, Taiwanese authorities began to build storage facilities for military equipment and ammunition in mid-July.Footnote 65

It would be a mistake to view the above-mentioned instances of war preparations as a fully centralized and carefully coordinated process, however, as the China market included numerous Chinese and foreign actors with competing interests.

Actors and institutions on the China market

Various actors and institutions, notably including foreign participants, played an essential role in the Qing’s new mode of war preparation. Individual and institutional actors included Chinese and foreign ambassadors, Chinese Maritime Customs Service staff, especially Inspector-General Robert Hart, aides and subordinates of influential officials such as Li Hongzhang, Chinese compradors and merchants, various bureaus established for handling emergencies or modernizing projects, foreign employees and consultants at various official or semi-official institutions, foreign firms specializing in the import and export trade in Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Tianjin, and agents of Euro-American manufacturers.Footnote 66 However, their efforts were not always coordinated, and overall arms purchases were not centralized.

Arms sales were a competitive business. Understandably, Shen Baozhen was approached by dealers and agents of Euro-American manufacturers, who were eager to seize the business opportunities created by the Sino-Japanese conflict. When Shen was managing the Qing’s defense efforts in Taiwan, dealers were selling weapons on the island. For example, in mid-July, Shen had a look at the latest British-made Martini–Henry rifles (Madini’anhai qiang 麻抵呢安孩槍), courtesy of someone called Wu Muchong 吳母蟲. Wu Muchong’s identity is unknown, but the name could be the Chinese transliteration of a foreign name.Footnote 67

The famous W. G. Armstrong & Company, a major British weaponry manufacturer, sent their agents directly to the Qing in 1874.Footnote 68 Meanwhile, a Mr. Bidwell, the company’s authorized agent and a partner of Bucheister & Company in Shanghai, was also very active on the China market. Receiving intelligence about Bidwell’s activities in China, Robert Hart, inspector-general of the Chinese Maritime Customs Service, commented that Bidwell “could not arrive in China at a better time. This Formosa affair [the Taiwan Incident] has given everything a little fillip, and the Mandarins are ready to try iron-clads, monitors, catapults, cross-bows, Krupps, old clo’s….”Footnote 69 The activities of these agents demonstrate a keen awareness of the commercial opportunities generated by the Taiwan Incident.

Bidwell might have cooperated with Sheng Xuanhuai. Sheng mailed several lists of weaponry purchasing recommendations for Shen’s consideration, and Shen mentioned “those items listed by Bidewei (Bidewei suokai 畢德衛所開),” apparently the Chinese transliteration of Bidwell. Shen did not consider these items to fit the needs of Taiwan’s defense but nonetheless forwarded all the lists to the trusted Giquel for a final decision. Bidwell and Sheng’s competitor, in this case, was a person surnamed Xu.Footnote 70 Xu also made a purchase recommendation, which was preferred by Shen.Footnote 71

Foreign firms in China had long participated in the arms trade, and participating firms and individuals had their own sources of imported weapons. In an 1878 advertisement in Shenbao, the major Chinese-language newspaper of the time, the firm Huadai (華岱, original name in English unknown) advertised weapons from continental Europe, such as guns, firearms, and even ironclads or other types of warships. To establish its reputation, the firm claimed two decades of experience in arms import in China. According to the firm’s advertisements, Li Hongzhang was among its clients.Footnote 72

As to British-made weapons, in 1874, two foreign firms frequently advertised weapons in Shenbao. One of them was Zaisheng 載生. As the authorized agent for a major British manufacturer, Zaisheng sold rifles, guns, gunpowder, and so on.Footnote 73 The other was the Shanghai-based firm Diers (Deyashi 地亞士). The firm claimed to have been in this business for years and had fulfilled orders from various bureaus in different provinces.Footnote 74 Another potential source of British firearms and gunboats was Inspector-General Robert Hart. He instructed his trusted agent in London to contact major British manufacturers directly.Footnote 75

American weapons also had a presence in China. The manufacturer E. Remington & Sons widely utilized advertising targeting either US or overseas markets to boost the sale of its rifles.Footnote 76 In 1875, the company’s advertisements appeared frequently in Shenbao.Footnote 77 Remington seemed to have a long-term relationship with the major American firm Augustine Heard & Company (Qiongji 琼記), which was active in the sale of Remington rifles in China.Footnote 78

At least occasionally, several dealers competed for the sale of the Remington rifles. One such dealer, Agenda 阿根大, invited customers to his or Shenbao’s office to inspect samples.Footnote 79 Even firms not specializing in the arms trade could participate in the business. For instance, Madelong 馬德隆, one such firm, sold mostly goods unrelated to military purposes but offered rifles as well.Footnote 80

To complicate the arms trade further, brokers and manufacturers primarily conducted business with provincial authorities and their various bureaus rather than the central government.Footnote 81 This explains the dealers’ incentive to place advertisements in the widely read newspaper Shenbao: since the Qing did not purchase weapons through a central bureau, it was beneficial for sellers to reach potential customers in different provinces. Long before 1874, provincial or even lower-level governments had purchased foreign weapons on their own. It was common that whenever military operations took place, local authorities would have to secure weapons. For instance, just as Japanese troops were arriving in Taiwan, Governor of Zhejiang Yang Changjun planned to purchase cannons and foreign firearms. To that end, he sent an agent at the rank of county magistrate to Guangdong province, where the agent successfully found available items.Footnote 82 Another example is from the Yunnan province in Southwest China. At some time, probably prior to 1874, Yunnan authorities ordered 3,000 rifles.Footnote 83

The consequence of decentralized military purchases was that the weapons used by Qing troops were not standardized.Footnote 84 When it came to military affairs or other modernizing initiatives, regional administrators and powerful statesmen had their own plans and preferences, often uncoordinated with one another or even conflicting. A telling example is that the Qing empire did not use a single kind of rifle, as the British did, but quite a few types as a result of local acquisition initiatives. For instance, when part of Tang’s troops, numbering 4,000, arrived in southern Taiwan on August 25, they carried all sorts of firearms, including breech-loading rifles, muzzle-loading rifles, and muskets made in China.Footnote 85 At the end of 1874, Li stated that the Qing had obtained Remington and Snider rifles. He and Shen both had thousands of Remington rifles. Nevertheless, Li also wanted to order a few British-made Martini–Henry rifles and to obtain thousands of Bierdanu 俾爾打呶 rifles made in Russia.Footnote 86

With the flow of arms managed by different parties at different stages, the process was fragmented and susceptible to errors or disagreements. A telling example can be found in a 1874 lawsuit involving several interconnected arms sales that involved multiple foreign firms and Chinese provincial governments.Footnote 87 At an unspecified time, Yunnan provincial authorities ordered 3,000 rifles from the firm Lutai 履泰 and later asked the firm Zaisheng to assist with reselling 500 of them. The 500 firearms were stored in another firm’s warehouse. At a total price of 5,000 silver taels, Zaisheng resold these 500 weapons to Diers. Diers shortly found an official buyer, the Shanghai intendant, and was expected to make a profit as high as 2,600 silver taels, or a 52% return on investment. However, when the firearms were retrieved from the warehouse, they were not only rusty but also of a different model. The deal was therefore not concluded. Diers sued Zaisheng, and in turn, in 1874, Zaisheng sued the Chinese clerk who had been assigned by a subordinate of the Yunnan provincial authorities to handle the transaction. In the court presided over jointly by German and Chinese officials, the Chinese clerk was accused of replacing the promised Snider rifles, one of the best makes at that time, with inferior firearms. This case illustrates how a complex web of actors and institutions enabled the flow of weapons across regions. In total, four firms were involved in the storage or sale of these firearms. These companies served the Yunnan and Shanghai authorities, who were unaware of each other’s military needs.

Thanks to various kinds of official and nonofficial actors, Chinese authorities managed to obtain large quantities of foreign weapons for the defense of the empire and its frontiers. However, these officials had to find sources of funding for these purchases.

Arranging loans

From the mid-nineteenth century onward, foreign loans became increasingly essential for the Qing’s war preparation. These loans were often used for payments and even served as prerequisites for purchasing foreign weapons. Similar to arms sales, wartime lending involved connections, collaborations, and competitions. However, a close analysis of how the Qing secured a loan during the Taiwan Incident shows that borrowing from foreign entities still encountered considerable opposition from domestic stakeholders. This reveals that the internationalized approach to war preparation was far from unanimously supported and that the Qing empire lacked a coherent plan. Nevertheless, foreign loans evolved into a staple of the Qing’s war preparations in the following decades.

Foreign loans facilitated war preparations in the 1870s. Shen Baozhen’s military purchases during the Taiwan Incident were connected to a foreign loan. The HSBC lent the Qing the so-called “Foochow Loan,” which was contracted on November 28.Footnote 88 Shen sought to take out the foreign loan in order to expedite large payments for arms sales and military activities in preparation for the imminent war.Footnote 89

The logic was related to the manner in which arms sales were made at this time. As Shen explained to top Fujian military and civil officials in late June or early July, buyers had to send a deposit when placing an order, and the remainder had to be paid once the goods arrived at the agreed-on port for delivery. There was no room to delay the payment. To further complicate the process, enquiries for available weapons often took an indefinite amount of time, but once they received a confirmation, interested buyers had to act promptly. For this reason, Shen considered a foreign loan as the solution to the lack of large and ready funds.Footnote 90

Furthermore, Shen opted for a foreign loan because he had exhausted the domestic financial resources at his disposal. In a letter to Fujian Governor-General Li Henian in July or August, Shen suggested that the foreign loans under discussion at that time be used as payments for the military purchases made by Prosper Giquel.Footnote 91 Ideally, Shen hoped that the loan could do away with the need for cash if the loan could be transferred directly from the lending party to the agents of the seller, most likely in Shanghai.

To make a case for the loan, Shen had to convince the court as well as his colleagues. As early as June 3, he had persuaded the top civil and military officials in Fujian to request permission from the court to take out a foreign loan.Footnote 92 The joint request, made by Shen, Governor-General of Fujian and Zhejiang Li Henian, and Wenyu, the General-in-Chief of Fuzhou, was approved in about ten days.Footnote 93 It should be emphasized that the domestic process of the proposed loan was far from completed: the permission granted consent to seek possible loans, not to accept them.

Although provincial authorities assisted with obtaining the court’s permission, Shen later complained about their indifference toward his plan, in particular, Governor-General Li Henian. Shen maintained that the information essential to taking out a loan was stored in the maritime customs office of Fujian and the provincial treasury, but officials there appeared to be unfamiliar with this matter, so much so that Shen himself copied out relevant documents for Governor-General Li’s information.Footnote 94 Moreover, to persuade Li, Shen contacted Wenyu, the top provincial military commander, for his help.Footnote 95 Shen also wrote to influential regional figures such as Lin Shoutu, a Fujian native who had managed the finances of the Qing’s military operations in the northwest years before.Footnote 96 Trusted by Wenyu, Lin at this time oversaw a military force and was responsible for inspecting the Foochow Navy Yard and the river mouth near the provincial seat.Footnote 97

These efforts seemed to work. Shen and top Fujianese authorities jointly informed the court of their borrowing plan on August 16, two months after receiving the court’s initial permission. The plan was to borrow two million silver taels from the HSBC. Critically, maritime customs in Fujian as well as other provinces would contribute their due shares to the repayment.Footnote 98 If obtained, the court’s approval could be read as redirecting to Shen funds currently outside Fujian’s reach.Footnote 99

As this financial proposal would certainly affect the finances of the central government and multiple provincial governments, Shen and his allies worked hard to weaken potential opposition. One of Shen’s close and strong allies was Li Hongzhang, who contacted influential regional administrators, such as Li Zongxi, the Commissioner of Trade for the Southern Ports, unequivocally expressed his support for Shen’s plan and praised Shen’s talent.

Thanks to such efforts, a mere day after Fujian’s joint proposal was sent out – it had probably not reached the imperial court yet – it had already been endorsed by the Zongli Yamen (then equivalent to the Qing’s Foreign Office). Significantly, the Zongli Yamen recommended that the court order the Ministry of Finance to secure Fujian’s urgent defense budgets, which would require the Ministry to contribute domestic resources. The court agreed.Footnote 100 Even though they had not received a response from the Ministry of Finance as of September 5, the Zongli Yamen proceeded to detail the portion of repayments that each provincial government was responsible for. Eleven governments were assigned a quota, ranging from 3,000 to 6,000 silver taels a year.Footnote 101

Fujian’s borrowing, unsurprisingly, attracted criticism from other provinces. In October, Shen refuted accusations of self-interest by underscoring the proposal’s benefits for the entire area of coastal China, not just Fujian.Footnote 102 Due to the financial obligations that accompany the loan, the loan was probably not favored even by Fujianese provincial officials, although they helped Shen make the request to the court. Therefore, after the likelihood of war with Japan decreased to some extent, the amount of the loan was reduced considerably. At some point, the borrowing seemed to have been abandoned altogether. In the end, the amount was reduced from six to two million silver taels. Who made the decision is uncertain, but Fujianese authorities must have played a critical role. From Shen’s perspective, Fujianese provincial authorities were not very supportive, even though they did assist with submitting the request to the court. Shen wrote to Governor-General Li to protest against the new amount. Months later, Li would harshly criticize Shen in all aspects and ask for Shen’s dismissal.

Similar to the military supplies Shen ordered, the loan entailed foreign connections. Shen, again, recommended Giquel to Li Henian. Giquel forwarded Shen a proposal for a loan at an 8 percent interest rate.Footnote 103 Against this backdrop, London bankers noticed Fujian’s attempts to secure funding as early as July 31. The amount of the potential loan was soon said to be several million taels.Footnote 104

In addition to soliciting financial and political support from Li Hongzhang, Shen soon realized that Robert Hart was essential to this borrowing.Footnote 105 Hart must, in some sense, “approve” the loan because foreign lenders considered the Qing’s customs revenues a reliable source of repayment and security. The North China Herald pointed out that the loan was secured by customs duty bonds.Footnote 106 For this reason, the Zongli Yamen forwarded Hart the draft contract of the Foochow Loan, and Hart offered a critical assessment of its terms and conditions in late September, noting, for instance, that he was concerned about the currency issue: “borrowing in China money to spend in Europe,” an arrangement that would result in unnecessary transaction fees.Footnote 107

In fact, Hart had been working on introducing his own loan to the Qing for some time. All this suggested that the Qing’s negotiations for a loan were not a concerted effort. Instead, several groups simultaneously interacted with different lending banks without much communication or cooperation with each other. Just as Shen signed a contract with the HSBC, Hart made a few inquiries about possible loans from the HSBC or the Oriental Bank, which he thought might offer better terms than Shen’s Foochow Loan. Through his long-distance secretary in London, Hart obtained a lending plan from the Oriental Bank.Footnote 108 He was serious about these inquiries and boasted access to Chinese and foreign intelligence alike. He knew well that Chinese authorities preferred short loans. The Oriental Bank did offer a revised version for Hart, but ultimately it was Shen’s deal that was sealed.

In addition to the HSBC and the Oriental Bank, others also competed to lend money to the Qing. One Shanghai correspondent of the London Times believed that an American firm was assisting the Qing in obtaining a three-million-dollar loan at nine percent interest secured by Maritimes Customs revenues.Footnote 109

The loan involved competing interests among Chinese officials and among foreign lenders. Concerned by the precedent that the Foochow loan would set, around September 17, the central government categorically prohibited other provinces from taking out loans for defense purposes. Taiwan’s defense borrowing was made an exception.Footnote 110 This stance was in response to the borrowing request made by Guangdong provincial authorities.

In retrospect, however, foreign lending became a common source of funding in the Qing’s final decades, whether in wartime or not, and much of this money was spent on weaponry. Between 1853 and 1912, the Qing took out a total of 155 foreign loans, including 16 before 1870, 5 in the 1870s, 20 in the 1880s, 21 in the 1890s, and 93 between 1900 and 1912. Of the 43 foreign loans contracted before the Sino-Japanese War, 31 were devoted to military purposes, including arms purchases, military operations, defense, indemnities, and soldiers’ pay and provisions. After the war, foreign loans were employed for a broader range of purposes, yet 23 out of 112 were still military-related. Indeed, with only one exception, all loans contracted prior to the 1880s were directed toward military purposes.Footnote 111 Foreign loans also continued to finance the purchase of Western weaponry in the late nineteenth century. For example, during the Sino-Japanese War, Inspector-General Robert Hart was informed by his secretary in London that loan agreements often required the borrower to purchase weapons at inflated prices and that loans could even be obtained directly from arms dealers.Footnote 112

Competing for limited resources

As foreign weapons and loans featured prominently in the Qing’s new mode of war preparation, the problem of competing for the same limited resources on the global market arose. In particular, during the Taiwan Incident – a conflict between two non-Western countries reliant on global resources – the Qing and Japan engaged in a zero-sum game for arms deals and loan applications.

Both the Qing and Japan were constrained by the availability of vessels for overseas military operations, and both looked to foreign vessels as a solution. Much as the Qing’s military mobilization was partly accomplished with foreign vessels, the very first batch of Japanese troops sent to Taiwan in 1874 were transported by a used steamship that Japan had just purchased from the British shipping company, the Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company.Footnote 113

It should be emphasized that both Asian states relied on European suppliers for their military resources. According to the intelligence gathered by Chinese agents in Japan, the country, after landing troops in Taiwan, continued to purchase gunboats, planned to order large quantities of armaments, and mobilized 60,000 troops equipped with foreign firearms.Footnote 114 The atmosphere was captured by a newspaper report, which described that “it is quite evident that the empire of Japan is at this moment one vast powder-magazine.”Footnote 115 Owing to the vigorous arms procurement efforts of Japan and China, Britain exported large quantities of European-manufactured arms to both countries during the Taiwan Incident.Footnote 116 Robert Hart suspected that some of the rifles supplied to China were in fact weapons that Japan had returned for failing quality standards.Footnote 117

In addition to weapons, the Qing and Japan competed for foreign capital through foreign firms or banks operating in East Asian treaty ports. For instance, the Oriental Bank lent $600,000 to Japan at the outset of the expedition but denied a second loan based on its risk assessments. This denial happened around early September 1874, at a time when the bank was considering lending money to the Qing.Footnote 118 In late September, the Oriental Bank was eager to seal the deal with the Qing, offering two loan proposals to Robert Hart. In fact, the two countries not only competed but also compared with one another. Since Japan had taken out a loan at an interest rate of 7 or 8 percent, Li Hongzhang considered that the Qing could likely be granted comparable terms.Footnote 119

Meanwhile, newspaper reports also compared the creditworthiness of the Qing and Japan, and it is likely that the assessments were not purely economic but also political. On September 28, according to a special correspondent of the China Mail, the Qing’s credit “is ten times better than that of Japan, and in modern warfare money will to a great extent carry the day.”Footnote 120 The appearance of this claim coincided with those of the Oriental Bank’s China loan proposals and the bank’s rejection of Japan’s further financial request.

Conclusion

The Taiwan Incident represented the moment at which the Qing’s internationalized approach to war preparation reached full maturity. To an unprecedented degree, the Qing was no longer entirely self-sufficient in the matter of arms or funds. Instead, the empire was now depending on global resources and engaged with individuals and institutions from different parts of the world. Access to both arms and funds became entangled with one another and preoccupied Qing officials.Footnote 121 This mode of war preparation would continue to shape Qing military operations in the last decades of the empire, despite efforts to build the domestic arms industry and limit foreign lending.Footnote 122

This mode of war preparation was characterized by coordination and competition. In terms of coordination, war preparation necessitated global operations, making personal connections that transcended national boundaries essential. Often, the flow of weapons or money across the world was facilitated by different actors at each stage of the process, making it similar to a relay. In this light, the safe delivery of bulk armaments was truly an achievement.

Competition occurred in various areas of war preparation: between buyers such as the Qing and Japan competing for weapons and loans on the global market; between sellers or brokers aiming to seal deals with Qing authorities; and between Qing officials vying for permission to secure loans or imported weapons for their jurisdictions. Instances of coordination and competition collectively demonstrate that war preparations during the Taiwan Incident were neither a centralized process nor a concerted effort.

The Qing empire’s relative success as a non-Western power during this era was due not only to domestic reforms aimed at self-strengthening but also to its strategic mobilization of global resources in service of national interests.Footnote 123 A telling indication is that a substantial share of global arms and capital was directed toward the defense of the Qing empire’s political peripheries. For instance, 53 percent of the total value of all foreign loans – amounting to forty-five million silver taels – borrowed between 1853 and 1890 were used to fund armed conflicts involving Qing frontiers or neighboring tributary states, such as Xinjiang, Taiwan, Vietnam, and Korea, as well as to suppress internal rebellions, including the Taiping War, that originated in frontier regions.Footnote 124 Although the Qing did not win every war, this internationalized strategy allowed it to retain control over most of its territory and avoid formal colonization.Footnote 125

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments. I also wish to acknowledge the valuable feedback provided by Steven B. Miles, the late Steven M. Goldstein, Dorinda (Dinda) Elliott, Harriet Wong, Chia-Hung Tsai, Yung-Ta Chien, Peng Hai, Chu-Shan Chiang, Kuo-Li Pi, Chao-Fang Chen, and W. Y. Chen in the early stages of this project. I acknowledge the use of OpenAI’s ChatGPT (https://chatgpt.com, GPT-4) for minor proofreading assistance. All substantive content is my own. This research was supported by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan (Grant No. 112-2410-H-003-180-MY2) and by National Taiwan Normal University.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Nan-Hsu Chen is an assistant professor of history at National Taiwan Normal University. His current research examines the social history of military logistics in Taiwan and Qing China.

Footnotes

1 The historical context of this phenomenon is what Tonio Andrade, a scholar of global and military history, has called the Great Military Divergence (Andrade Reference Andrade2016); On September 28, 1874, the London and China Telegraph cited the Herald’s coverage of the conclusion of the loan and, not coincidentally, the Qing’s vigorous war preparations.

2 The Economist, October 3, 1874.

3 In fact, the Qing’s borrowing from one of its major foreign lenders in the nineteenth century – the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation – was driven primarily by military needs (Frank King Reference King1987, 550). The Bank handled approximately 75 percent of the Qing’s foreign loans prior to 1895 (Van de Ven Reference van de Ven2014, 136–137). For the connection between lending and arms sales in the Sino-French War, see Xu Reference Xu1962, 3.

4 David King Reference King and King1983, 263; Wenjie Li Reference Li2025, 19–21. By some definitions, a few borrowings in the post-Taiping era could likewise be classified as sovereign debt (Ma Linghe Reference Ma2005, 43, 52).

5 D. King Reference King and King1983, 231.

7 Zuo sought to obtain large advances promptly and to overcome the problem of delayed transfers of financial assistance from other provinces (Ma Linghe Reference Ma2005, 43–46).

9 In 1879, Ryukyu was formally incorporated as a prefecture of Japan (Okamoto Reference Okamoto and Yuwen2025, 197–210; Fujii Reference Fujii1992, 47–53).

10 The Qing considered some groups among the indigenous population as incapable of being civilized and their lands as lying beyond civilization – a rationale for a policy of non-intervention. Yet, in diplomatic negotiations, the Qing still treated these areas as part of its “territory,” or “bantu” 版圖 (Chang Reference Chang and Kan2007, 268–269, 274).

11 A notable exception is historian Wang Ermin, who briefly discussed the deployment of troops and the mobilization of steamers for that purpose. Wang Reference Wang1995, 379–87.

12 For the former body of literature, see Yen Reference Yen1965; Leung Reference Leung1983; Fujii Reference Fujii1992; Mizuno Reference Mizuno2009; Eskildsen Reference Eskildsen2019; for the latter body of literature, see Ohama Reference Ohama2007; Fix Reference Fix and Hung2009; Hane Reference Hane, Wakabayashi and Matsunaga2009; Tseng Reference Tseng2017.

13 Halsey Reference Halsey2015. Still, quite a few scholars view foreign lending and the international arms trade as instruments of Western political and economic domination. While not entirely unfounded, this perspective tends to downplay the agency of Chinese political elites and their strategic deployment of global resources in remaking the Qing into a powerful empire, as well as the roles played by actors from diverse backgrounds who did not necessarily have their home country’s best interests in mind when facilitating foreign lending or arms sales. Ghassan Moazzin has questioned this “imperialism paradigm” in his study of foreign banks (Moazzin Reference Moazzin2022, 4–9). For critical assessments of foreign lending and the international arms trade, see Xu Reference Xu1962, 1; Ma Jinhua Reference Ma2011, 233–4; Fei Reference Fei2023b, chap. 6.

14 Jonathan Grant (Reference Grant and Bruinsma2015) produces a fine overview of global arms trade and military technology developments. The following paragraphs also draw upon Grant’s article.

15 Daniel R. Headrick calls this “the Breechloader Revolution,” which, not coincidentally, coincides with the new mode of war preparation in the Qing empire. Headrick Reference Headrick1981, 97.

16 Perdue Reference Perdue2005, 550–1, 564; Andrade Reference Andrade2016, 9.

17 For Qing military achievements in the eighteenth century, see Lai Reference Lai1984; Li Bozhong Reference Li2019, 163, 178, 386.

18 Nonetheless, soldiers were responsible for procuring close-range weapons for their personal use (Lai Reference Lai1984, 293–7; Theobald Reference Theobald2013, 164).

19 In the Second Jinchuan Campaign of 1771–1776, the most expensive war the Qing fought in the eighteenth century, government revenues accounted for more than 90 percent of total military expenditures (Theobald Reference Theobald2013, 100, 122–123, 150).

20 To suppress the White Lotus rebellion of 1796–1804, the Qing utilized donations from merchants and revenues generated through the sale of civil service examination degrees. (Dai Reference Dai2019, 12, 379–382).

21 Moazzin Reference Moazzin2022, 37. In the late 1860s, Robert Hart, Inspector-General of the Chinese Maritime Customs, assisted the Qing in institutionalizing foreign loans – transforming them into bona fide government loans with bonds issued overseas. Under Hart’s framework, the court retained the authority to approve or deny borrowing requests (Van de Ven Reference van de Ven2014, 136–137).

22 These activities echo Platt’s recent assessment of the Taiping Civil War. He emphasized that it was an international event, with its outcome also shaped by foreign diplomatic and military interventions (Platt Reference Platt2012).

23 Horowitz Reference Horowitz2012, 160. It was not until the mid-nineteenth century that the purchase of Western firearms, cannons, gunboats, and other military articles gained momentum (Qiao et al. Reference Qiao, Li and Liu1999; Sun Reference Sun2011; Li Yingquan and Guan Wei Reference Li and Guan2012; Fei and Wen Reference Fei and Wen2013; Fei Reference Fei2015.) A vast body of literature on nineteenth-century China’s imported Euro-American weapons has been produced. See Sun Reference Sun2015; Zeng Reference Zeng2017; Gao Reference Gao2022; Sun Reference Sun2023.

25 Xu Reference Xu1962, 1–6. It should be noted that during the Taiping War provincial authorities explored new financial resources for war preparations – not only foreign loans but also customs revenues and transit taxes (Horowitz Reference Horowitz2012, 162; Yu Reference Yu, Graff and Higham2012, 148).

27 Kuhn Reference Kuhn and Fairbank1978, 301, 307.

29 Horowitz Reference Horowitz2012, 156–7.

30 Powell Reference Powell1955, 42.

32 The efficacy of the Qing’s arsenals was limited by their foreign dependency. Overall, domestic production contributed more to the suppression of rebellions than to the resistance against foreign powers (Kennedy Reference Kennedy1978, 150; Kuo and Liu Reference Kuo, Liu and Fairbank1978, 519–25; Wang Reference Wang2009, 105–12).

34 Powell Reference Powell1955, 47–8.

35 Wang Reference Wang2009, 105.

36 Liu and Smith Reference Liu, Smith, Fairbank and Liu1980, 227–8, 232, 239; D. King Reference King and King1983, 231.

39 Xu Reference Xu1962, 1–22, especially 3, 22. For Zuo’s borrowings, see Xu pp. 18–19; A related phenomenon was the “internationalization” of the Qing’s financial sector at this time, largely attributable to the presence of foreign banks in China. The new mode of war preparation can be viewed as part of this trend. See Moazzin Reference Moazzin2022.

40 Fei Reference Fei2023a, 28–40.

41 An American military advisor who joined the expedition remarked that the Japanese force had the potential to be as “efficient as any in the world,” provided it maintained discipline (Eskildsen Reference Eskildsen2010).

42 Wang Reference Wang1995, 385–7.

43 Wang Reference Wang1981, 295–310.

44 Li Hongzhang Reference Li1962, vol. 4:304–305.

45 Shen Reference Shen2004, 476–96. Firearms had advanced rapidly since the nineteenth century. In the 1880s, magazine rifles exponentially increased the number of shots per minute (Wawro Reference Wawro, Showalter, van de Ven and Chickering2012).

46 North China Herald, Jul 4, 1874.

47 Times of India, August 11, 1874.

48 Wang Reference Wang1995, 385.

49 Taiwan yinhang Reference Taiwan1968, 80–1.

50 Wang Reference Wang2009, 107.

51 Atwater Reference Atwater1939, 16; Henning and Witkowski Reference Henning and Witkowski2013, 427–8, 435; Grant Reference Grant and Bruinsma2015, 71, 74.

52 “Grand Council Report (Junjichu dang zhejian),” 115097; Huang et al. Reference Huang, Lin and Ang1997, 144.

53 “Junjichu dangce yuezhe dang (Monthly Record Books of Grand Council).” 603000693–035.

54 Leibo Reference Leibo1985, 140.

55 “Sheng Xuanhuai dangan,” Shen Baozhen to Sheng Xuanhuai, July 29, 1874.

56 Zuo Reference Zuo1975, 435–6.

57 Shen Reference Shen1998, 33–5, 82–3. According to Shen’s estimation, he was to receive the ordered firearms around September or October.

58 “Grand Council Report,” 117632.

59 The Times (London), September 7, 1874.

60 It is noteworthy that the report is a pro-Japanese account that uses this intelligence to criticize Europeans furnishing the Qing with weapons and disregarding Europe’s true interest.

61 Li Hongzhang Reference Li1962, 77–80; Shen Reference Shen1998, 34–5. The bureau dispensed the rifles to Tang. “Sheng Xuanhuai dangan,” Tang Dingkui to Sheng Xuanhuai, September 11, 1874.

62 Rowe Reference Rowe2009, 207–8.

63 Wang and Wu Reference Wang and Wu1993, 19.

64 North China Herald, August 8, 1874.

65 Shen Reference Shen1967, 971–3.

67 Shen Reference Shen1998, 34.

68 These three agents – Charles C. Clarke, William F. Spinney, and Hosea B. Morse – were expected to arrive in China on August 20 (Hart and Campbell Reference Hart, Campbell, Han and Chen1990, vol. 1:36–37).

69 Hart and Campbell Reference Hart, Campbell, Han and Chen1990, vol. 1:40.

70 He was likely Xu Run or Xu Wenda.

71 “Sheng Xuanhuai dangan,” Shen Baozhen to Sheng Xuanhuai, July 29, 1874.

72 Shenbao, July 3, 1878; For the importation of German-made weapons by foreign firms in China, see Sun Reference Sun2015, 102–114.

73 Shenbao, May 13, 1874.

74 Shenbao, July 17, 1874.

75 Hart and Campbell Reference Hart, Campbell, Han and Chen1990, vol. 1:79–81.

76 Henning and Witkowski Reference Henning and Witkowski2013.

77 See, for instance, Shenbao, June 12, 1875.

78 Shenbao, February 23, 1875.

79 Shenbao, April 27, 1875.

80 Shenbao, July 17, 1875.

81 Fei Reference Fei2023b, 44–6.

82 Shenbao, October 15, 1874.

83 Shenbao, October 6, 1874.

84 On this phenomenon, see Sun Reference Sun2016.

85 North China Herald, October 3, 1874.

86 “Grand Council Report,” 117632.

87 Shenbao, October 3, October 5, October 6, 1874.

88 D. King Reference King and King1983, 247; Hui and Rudkin, 4–6.

89 Shen Reference Shen1998, 45, 49.

90 Shen Reference Shen1998, 30–1.

91 Shen Reference Shen1998, 60–1.

92 “Grand Council Report,” 114999.

93 Zhongguo diyi lishi danganguan 1998, vol. 24:135–136.

94 Shen Reference Shen1998, 57.

95 Shen Reference Shen1998, 44.

96 Shen Reference Shen1998, 45.

97 “Grand Council Report,” 115000.

98 For this Shen thanked Fujian’s top civil and military officials for their work. Shen Reference Shen1998, 60–2; “Grand Council Report,” 116084. Shen Reference Shen1998, 30–1.

99 Zuo Zongtang employed the same strategy to finance his military campaigns in the northwest. Liu and Smith Reference Liu, Smith, Fairbank and Liu1980, 227–8.

100 “Grand Council Report,” 115907.

101 “Grand Council Report,” 116196.

102 Shen Reference Shen1998, 192–3.

103 Shen Reference Shen1998, 34–5, 42–3, 49.

104 Hart and Campbell Reference Hart, Campbell, Han and Chen1990, 52–3.

105 Shen Reference Shen1998, 49.

106 This North China Herald article was cited by London and China Telegraph. London and China Telegraph, September 28, 1874.

107 Hart and Campbell Reference Hart, Campbell, Han and Chen1990, 67.

108 Hart and Campbell Reference Hart, Campbell, Han and Chen1990, 67; For the various potential loans from multiple sources under discussion at this time, see D. King Reference King and King1983, 232–233, 237–241, 244–247.

109 The Economist, October 3, 1874.

110 Li Hongzhang Reference Li1961, 73; D. King Reference King and King1983, 235, 262.

111 Xu Reference Xu1962, 4–10, 28–53.

112 Hart and Campbell Reference Hart, Campbell, Han and Chen1990, vol. 3:1321, 1322. For further examples of the link between foreign loans and international arms purchases in the late nineteenth century, see Fei Reference Fei2023b, 173–185.

113 Eskildsen Reference Eskildsen2010, 45.

114 “Sheng Xuanhuai dangan,” Sheng Xuanhuai to Wang Wenshao, August 22, 1874.

115 London and China Telegraph, August 24, 1874.

116 Hart and Campbell Reference Hart, Campbell, Han and Chen1990, vol. 1:70.

117 Shen Reference Shen1998, 105. Similarly, during the First Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895, both China and Japan sought to secure cannons through competition on the international arms market (Wang Reference Wang2009, 107).

118 North China Herald, September 19, 1874.

119 Li Hongzhang Reference Li1961, 28.

120 London and China Telegraph, September 28, 1874.

121 Xu Reference Xu1962, 1–21. Global resources and international collaborations also played a crucial role in other Qing frontiers, most notably in the empire’s reconquest of Xinjiang around the same time. At least six foreign loans were taken out to fund the reconquest. Collectively, these loans equalled 32 percent of the military expenses, or 19 percent of the combined military and reconstruction expenditure, between 1875 and 1881 (Millward Reference Millward2022, 128).

122 Between the 1870s and 1890s, “the Chinese never accepted the idea of foreign loans as a regular source of additional financing” (D. King Reference King and King1983, 262).

123 In sharp contrast to the Qing, a weak state “ha[d] a limited ability to extract and mobilize human, material, or organizational resources in pursuit of coherent foreign and domestic policies.” See the examples of the Ottoman empire and its provinces (Halsey Reference Halsey2015, 35–36, 50–51; the quote is on page 266).

124 Xu Reference Xu1962, 21.

125 Halsey Reference Halsey2015, chap. 1.

References

Andrade, T. (2016). The Gunpowder Age: China, Military Innovation, and the Rise of the West in World History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctvc77j74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atwater, E. (1939). “American Regulation of Arms Exports.” PhD diss, District of Columbia: American University.Google Scholar
Chang, L.C. 張隆志. (2007). Zhimin jiechu yu wenhua zhuanyi: yiba qisi nian Taiwan ‘fandi’ zhuquan zhengyi de zai sikao 殖民接觸與文化轉譯:一八七四年臺灣『番地』主權論爭的再思考 [Colonial encounters and cultural translation: Rethinking the 1874 sovereignty dispute over the “savage territory” in Taiwan]. In Kan, H.C. 甘懷真 (ed), Dongya lishi shang de tianxia yu Zhongguo gainian 東亞歷史上的天下與中國概念 [The Concepts of Tianxia and China in East Asian History]. Taipei: Taida chuban zhongxin. pp. 255–84.Google Scholar
Dai, Y. (2019). The White Lotus War: Rebellion & Suppression in Late Imperial China. Seattle: University of Washington Press.10.1515/9780295745466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, R. (2010). An army as good and efficient as any in the world: James Wasson and Japan’s 1874 expedition to Taiwan. Asian Cultural Studies 36, 4562.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, R. (2019). Transforming Empire in Japan and East Asia: The Taiwan Expedition and the Birth of Japanese Imperialism. Singapore: Springer Singapore.10.1007/978-981-13-3480-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fei, Z. 费志杰 and Wen, S. 文双发. (2013). Shixi haiguan jiandu zai jindai huayang junhuo maoyi zhong de zhongyao juese: yi Sheng Xuanhuai weili 试析海关监督在近代华洋军火贸易中的重要角色:以盛宣怀为例 [The critical role of customs inspectors in modern Sino-foreign arms trade: the case of Sheng Xuanhuai]. Shilin 史林, 6, 117–31.Google Scholar
Fei, Z. 费志杰. (2015). Shixi wanqing dufu zai huayang junhuo maoyi zhong de zuoyong 试析晚清督抚在华洋军火贸易中的作用 [The role of governors and governors-general in the Sino-foreign arms trade during the late Qing]. Zhongzhou xuekan 中州学刊, 4, 124–29.Google Scholar
Fei, Z. 费志杰. (2023a). Wanqing huayang junpin maoyi de fazhan yu yingxiang 晚清华洋军品贸易的发展与影响 [Developments and Impacts of the Sino-Foreign Arms Trade in the Late Qing Period]. Shanghai: Shanghai renmin.Google Scholar
Fei, Z. 费志杰. (2023b). Wanqing huayang junpin maoyi de xingqi yu chouhua 晚清华洋军品贸易的兴起与筹划 [The Rise and State Planning of the Sino-Foreign Arms Trade in the Late Qing Period]. Shanghai: Shanghai renmin.Google Scholar
Fix, D.L. (2009). The changing contours of lived communities on the Hengchun Peninsula, 1850–1874. In Hung, L.W. 洪麗完 (ed), Guojia yu yuanzhumin: Yatai diqu zuqun lishi yanjiu 國家與原住民:亞太地區族群歷史研究 [States and Indigenous Peoples: Ethnic Groups and Histories in the Asia-Pacific Region]. Taipei: Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica. pp. 233–82.Google Scholar
Fujii, S. 藤井志津枝. (1992). Jindai zhongri guanxi shi yuanqi: 1871–74 nian Taiwan shijian 近代中日關係史源起: 1871–74年台灣事件 [The Origins of Modern Sino-Japanese Relations: The Taiwan Incident of 1871–1874]. Taipei: Jinhe.Google Scholar
Gao, X. 高学琴. (2022). Cong Shenbao junxie guanggao kan wanqing junshi biange 从⟪申报⟫军械广告看晚清军事变革 [Late Qing military reforms through the lens of weaponry advertisements in Shenbao]. Changchun daxue xuebao 长春大学学报 32 (1): 92100.Google Scholar
Grand Council Report ( Junjichu dang zhejian 軍機處檔摺件). unpublished. Taipei. National Palace Museum.Google Scholar
Grant, J. (2015). The arms traffic in world history. In Bruinsma, G. (ed), Histories of Transnational Crime. New York: Springer. pp. 7190 10.1007/978-1-4939-2471-4_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsey, S.R. (2015). Quest for Power: European Imperialism and the Making of Chinese Statecraft. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hane, J. 羽根次郎. (2009). ‘Nanjia zhimeng’ he Liuqiu piaoliumin shahai shijian 「南岬之盟」和琉球漂流民殺害事件 [The “Oath of Nanjia” and the killing of Ryukyu castaways]. In Wakabayashi, M. 若林正丈 and Matsunaga, M. 松永正義 (eds), Kuayu qingnian xuezhe Taiwanshi yanjiu xuji 跨域青年學者臺灣史研究續集 [Transregional Research on Taiwan by Young Scholars: A Sequel]. Taipei: Daoxiang. pp. 340 Google Scholar
Hart, R. and Campbell, J.D. (1990). Archives of China’s Imperial Maritime Customs: Confidential Correspondence between Robert Hart and James Duncan Campbell, 1874–1907. Han, R. 韩荣芳 and Chen, X. 陈霞飞. (eds), Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar
Headrick, D.R. (1981). The Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henning, R.A. and Witkowski, T.H. (2013). The advertising of E. Remington & Sons: the creation of an iconic brand, 1854–1888. Journal of Historical Research in Marketing 5 (4), 418–48.10.1108/JHRM-11-2012-0028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, R.S. (2012). Beyond the marble boat: the transformation of the Chinese Military, 1850–1911. In Graff D. and Higham R. (eds), A Military History of China. updated edition. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky. pp. 153–74.Google Scholar
Hsü, I.C.Y. (1964). The great policy debate in China, 1874: maritime defense versus frontier defense. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 25, 212–28.10.2307/2718343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, F.S. 黃富三, Lin, M.H. 林滿紅, and Ang, K. 翁佳音 (eds). (1997). Maritime Customs Annual Returns and Reports of Taiwan, 1867–1895. Taipei: Zhongyang yanjiuyuan Taiwanshi yanjiusuo.Google Scholar
Hui, F. and Rudkin, K.M. (2009.) Hongkong and Shanghai Bank and the Foochow Loan: A Case for Dual Identities.Google Scholar
Junjichu dangce yuezhe dang (軍機處檔冊月摺檔, Monthly Record Books of Grand Council). unpublished. Taipei. National Palace Museum.Google Scholar
Kennedy, T.L. (1978). The Arms of Kiangnan: Modernization in the Chinese Ordnance Industry, 1860–1895. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
King, D.J.S. (1983). China’s first public loan: the Hongkong Bank and the Chinese imperial government ‘Foochow’ loan of 1874. In King, F.H.H. (ed), Eastern Banking: Essays in the History of the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation. London: Athlone Press. pp. 230–64Google Scholar
King, F.H.H. (1987). The Hongkong Bank in Late Imperial China, 1864–1902: On an Even Keel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, P.A. (1978). The Taiping Rebellion. In Fairbank, J.K. (ed), The Cambridge History of China, vol. 10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 264317. 10.1017/CHOL9780521214476.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, T. and Liu, K.C. (1978). Self-strengthening: the pursuit of western technology. In Fairbank, J.K. (ed) The Cambridge History of China, vol. 10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 491542 10.1017/CHOL9780521214476.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, F.S. 賴福順. (1984). Qianlong zhongyao zhanzheng zhi junxu yanjiu 乾隆重要戰爭之軍需硏究 [Military Logistics in Major Wars During the Qianlong Reign]. Taipei: Guoli gugong bowuyuan.Google Scholar
Leibo, S.A. (1985). Transferring Technology to China: Prosper Giquel and the Self-Strengthening Movement. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Leung, E.P. (1983). The Quasi-War in East Asia: Japan’s Expedition to Taiwan and the Ryūkyū Controversy. Modern Asian Studies 17 (2), 257–81.10.1017/S0026749X00015638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, B. 李伯重. (2019). Huoqiang yu zhangbu: Zaoqi jingji quanqiuhua shidai de Zhongguo yu Dongya shijie 火槍與帳簿:早期經濟全球化時代的中國與東亞世界 [Guns and Accounts: China and East Asia in the Era of Early Economic Globalization]. New Taipei: Lianjing.Google Scholar
Li, H. 李鴻章. (1961). Li Wenzhonggong xuanji 李文忠公選集 [Selected Works of Li Hongzhang]. Taipei: Taiwan yinhang.Google Scholar
Li, H. 李鴻章. (1962). Li Wenzhonggong quanji 李文忠公全集 [Complete Works of Li Hongzhang]. Taipei: Wenhai.Google Scholar
Li, W. (2025). HSBC’s Taiwan defense loan and the formation of modern China’s foreign debt pattern. Journal of Modern Chinese History, 124. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535654.2024.2500165.Google Scholar
Li, Y. 李英全 and Guan, W. 关伟. (2012). Lun wanqing huaijun de jungou dui zhongguo junshi jindaihua de yingxiang 论晚清淮军的军购对中国军事近代化的影响 [The impact of Huai Army arms purchases on China’s military modernization]. Guangdong waiyu waimao daxue xuebao 广东外语外贸大学学报 23 (5), 8995.Google Scholar
Liu, K. and Smith, R.J. (1980). The military challenge: the north-west and the coast. In Fairbank, J.K. and Liu, K. (eds), The Cambridge History of China, vol. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 202–7310.1017/CHOL9780521220293.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, J. 马金华. (2011). Waizhai yu wan Qing zhengju 外债与晚清政局 [Foreign Loans and the Political Order of Late Qing China]. Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.Google Scholar
Ma, L. 马陵合. (2005). Wanqing waizhaishi yanjiu 晚清外债史研究 [A Study of Foreign Loans in the Late Qing]. Shanghai: Fudan daxue.Google Scholar
Millward, J.A. (2022). Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang. Revised and Updated. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mizuno, N. (2009). Early meiji policies towards the Ryukyus and the Taiwanese aboriginal territories. Modern Asian Studies 43 (3), 683739.10.1017/S0026749X07003034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moazzin, G. (2022). Foreign Banks and Global Finance in Modern China: Banking on the Chinese Frontier, 1870–1919. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009037891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohama, I. 大浜郁子. (2007). Botansha jiken saiko: naze Paiwanzoku wa Ryukyu tomin o satsugaishita no ka 「牡丹社事件」再考ーなぜパイワン族は琉球島民を殺害したのか [Reconsidering the “Mudan Incident”: Why Did the Paiwan People Kill the Ryukyu Islanders?]. Taiwan genjumin kenkyu 台湾原住民研究, 11, 203–23.Google Scholar
Okamoto, T. 岡本隆司. (2025). Lishi xuejia xiegei suoyouren de Ribenshi 歷史學家寫給所有人的日本史 中国史とつなげて学ぶ日本全史 [A Complete History of Japan in the Context of Chinese History]. Translated by Yuwen, Xu. New Taipei: Taiwan shangwu yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Perdue, P.C. (2005). China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674042025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, S.R. (2012). Autumn in the Heavenly Kingdom: China, the West, and the Epic Story of the Taiping Civil War. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Powell, R.L. (1955). The Rise of Chinese Military Power, 1895–1912. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Qiao, W. 乔伟, Li, X. 李喜所, and Liu, X. 刘晓琴. (1999). Deguo Kelubo yu wanqing junshi de jindaihua 德国克虏伯与晚清军事的近代化 [The German Company Krupp and Military Modernization in Late Qing China]. Nankai xuebao 南开学报, 3, 6773.Google Scholar
Rowe, W.T. (2009). China’s Last Empire: The Great Qing. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shen, B. 沈葆楨. (1967). Shen Wensugong (Baozhen) zhengshu 沈文肅公(葆楨)政書 [Government-Related Works of Shen Baozhen]. Taibei xian: Wenhai.Google Scholar
Shen, B. 沈葆楨. (1998). Shen Wensu gongdu 沈文肅公牘 [Public Documents of Shen Baozhen]. Nantou: Taiwansheng wenxian weiyuanhui.Google Scholar
Shen, B. 沈葆楨. (2004). Shen Wensu zhengshu xubian 沈文肅政書續編 [Sequel to Government-Related Works of Shen Baozhen]. Beijing: Jiuzhou.Google Scholar
Shenbao, 申報 [The Newspaper Shenbao ].Google Scholar
Sheng Xuanhuai dangan 盛宣懷檔案 [The Sheng Xuanhuai Collection]. unpublished. Hong Kong. The Chinese University of Hong Kong Library.Google Scholar
Smith, R.J. (1976). Foreign-training and China’s self-strengthening: the case of Feng-Huang-Shan, 1864–1873. Modern Asian Studies 10 (2), 195223.10.1017/S0026749X0000593XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R.J. (1994). Li Hung-Chang’s use of foreign military talent: the formative period, 1862–1874. In Samuel, C. and Liu, K. (eds), Li Hung-Chang and China’s Early Modernization. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe Press. pp. 119–42Google Scholar
Sun, L. 孫烈. (2011). Wanqing chouban beiyang haijun shi yinjin junshi zhuangbei de silu yu qudao: cong yize Li Hongzhang zhi Kelubo de shumingxin tanqi 晚清筹办北洋海军时引进军事装备的思路与渠道:从一则李鸿章致克虏伯的署名信谈起 [The establishment of the Beiyang Navy: thoughts and pathways in a letter from Li Hongzhang to the Krupp Company]. Ziran bianzhengfa yanjiu 自然辩证法研究 27 (6), 9397.Google Scholar
Sun, L. 孫烈. (2015). Deguo Kelubo yu wanqing huopao: maoyi yu fangzhi moshi xia de jishu zhuanyi 德國克虜伯與晚清火炮:貿易與仿製模式下的技術轉移 [The German Company Krupp and Artillery in the Late Qing: Technology Transfer Through Trade and Imitation]. Jinan: Shandong jiaoyu.Google Scholar
Sun, L. 孫烈. (2016). Zhongguo wuqi zhishi tixi de jianli yu fazhan (1864–1955) 中国武器制式体系的建立与发展(1864–1955) [The establishment and evolution of a standardized weapons system in China, 1864–1955]. Gongcheng yanjiu: kua xueke shiye zhong de gongcheng 工程研究:跨学科视野中的工程 8 (3), 297306.Google Scholar
Sun, L. 孫烈. (2023). The emergence of appropriate technology: the localization of German Krupp artillery technology in China (1866–1932). Chinese Annals of History of Science and Technology 7 (1), 139.10.3724/SP.J.1461.2023.01001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taiwan, yinhang 臺灣銀行, ed. (1968). Qingji Shenbao Taiwan jishi jilu 清季申報臺灣紀事輯錄 [Selected Shenbao Articles on Taiwan During the Qing Era]. Taipei: Taiwan yinhang.Google Scholar
Theobald, U. (2013). War Finance and Logistics in Late Imperial China: A Study of the Second Jinchuan Campaign (1771–1776). Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004255678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, M.T. 曾明德. (2017). Langqiao diqu fanchan jiaoyi tixi yu 1871 nian Liuqiuren yunan shijian 瑯嶠地區番產交易體系與1871年琉球人遇難事件 [The indigenous goods trade in Langqiao and the Ryukyu castaway incident of 1871]. Shiyuan 史原, 29, 137–71.Google Scholar
van de Ven, Hans (2003). Military Mobilization in China, 1840–1949. In Black, J. (ed), War in the Modern World since 1815. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. pp. 2040.Google Scholar
van de Ven, Hans (2014). Breaking with the Past: The Maritime Customs Service and the Global Origins of Modernity in China. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, E. 王爾敏 and Wu, L. 吳倫霓霞, eds. (1993). Qingji waijiao yingyin handian ziliao 清季外交因應函電資料 [Sheng Xuanhuai’s Letters and Telegraphs on Foreign Affairs in the Late Qing]. Taipei: Zhongyang yanjiuyuan jindaishi yanjiusuo.Google Scholar
Wang, E. 王爾敏. (1981). Huaijun zhi 淮軍志 [A Monograph on the Huai Army]. Taipei: Zhongyang yanjiuyuan jindaishi yanjiusuo.Google Scholar
Wang, E. 王爾敏. (1995). Jiaxu rijun qintai qingting zhi yuanfang yinying 甲戌日軍侵臺清廷之援防因應 [Qing defense against the Japanese invasion during the Taiwan Incident of 1874]. In Jiawu zhanzheng yibai zhounian jinian xueshu yantaohui lunwenji 甲午戰爭一百週年紀念學術研討會論文集 [An Edited Volume Commemorating the Centenary of the Sino-Japanese War]. Taipei: Shida lishisuo.Google Scholar
Wang, E. 王爾敏. (2009). Qingji binggongye de xingqi 清季兵工業的興起 [The Rise of the Arms Industry During the Qing Era]. Guilin: Guangxi shifan daxue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Wawro, G. (2012). War, technology, and industrial change, 1850–1914. In Showalter, D., van de Ven, H., and Chickering, R. (eds), The Cambridge History of War, vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 4568 10.1017/CHO9781139021203.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y. 徐義生. (1962). Zhongguo jindai waizhaishi tongji ziliao (1853–1927) 中國近代外債史統計資料:1853–1927 [Statistical Materials on the History of Foreign Debt in Modern China, 1853–1927]. Beijing: Zhonghua.Google Scholar
Yen, S.S. (1965). Taiwan in China’s Foreign Relations, 1836–1874. Hamden, CT: Shoe String Press.Google Scholar
Yu, M. (2012). The Taiping Rebellion: a military assessment of revolution and counterrevolution. In Graff, D. and Higham, R. (eds), A Military History of China. updated edition. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky. pp. 135–51Google Scholar
Zeng, Z. 曾志文. (2017). Tongguang zhiji xizheng Xinjiang de junhuo chougou 同光之际西征新疆的军火筹购 [Arms purchases for the Qing expedition to Xinjiang during the Tongzhi and Guangxu reigns]. Hanshan shifan xueyuan xuebao 韩山师范学院学报 38 (1), 5460.Google Scholar
Zhongguo diyi lishi danganguan 中國第一歷史檔案館, ed. (1998). Xianfeng Tongzhi liangchao shangyudang 咸豐同治兩朝上諭檔 [An Archive of Xianfeng and Tongzhi Imperial Edicts]. Guilin: Guangxi shifan daxue.Google Scholar
Zuo, Z. 左宗棠. (1975). Chuanzheng zoushu huibian 船政奏疏彙編 [A Collection of Memorials on Naval Shipbuilding and Administration]. Taipei: Wenhai.Google Scholar