Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-j7khd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T00:54:37.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Postemergence Glyphosate Application Timing on Weed Control and Grain Yield in Glyphosate-Resistant Corn: Results of a 2-Yr Multistate Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Steven A. Gower ,
Mark M. Loux ,
John Cardina ,
S. Kent Harrison ,
Paul L. Sprankle ,
Norman J. Probst ,
Thomas T. Bauman ,
Wayne Bugg ,
W. S. Curran  and
Randall S. Currie
...Show all authors
Steven A. Gower
Affiliation:
Diagnostic Services, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Mark M. Loux*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, and Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691
John Cardina
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, and Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691
S. Kent Harrison
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, and Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691
Paul L. Sprankle
Affiliation:
Monsanto Company, Westerville, OH 43081
Norman J. Probst
Affiliation:
Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO 63198
Thomas T. Bauman
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Wayne Bugg
Affiliation:
Monsanto Company, Noblesville, IN 46060
W. S. Curran
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Randall S. Currie
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Garden City, KS 67846
R. Gordon Harvey
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
William G. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
James J. Kells
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Micheal D. K. Owen
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
David L. Regehr
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Charles H. Slack
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546
Marvin Spaur
Affiliation:
Monsanto Company, Monmouth, IL 61462
Christy L. Sprague
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Mark Vangessel
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sciences Department, University of Delaware, Georgetown, DE 19947
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and General Agriculture, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: loux.1@osu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted at 35 sites throughout the north-central United States in 1998 and 1999 to determine the effect of postemergence glyphosate application timing on weed control and grain yield in glyphosate-resistant corn. Glyphosate was applied at various timings based on the height of the most dominant weed species. Weed control and corn grain yields were considerably more variable when glyphosate was applied only once. The most effective and consistent season-long annual grass and broadleaf weed control occurred when a single glyphosate application was delayed until weeds were 15 cm or taller. Two glyphosate applications provided more consistent weed control when weeds were 10 cm tall or less and higher corn grain yields when weeds were 5 cm tall or less, compared with a single application. Weed control averaged at least 94 and 97% across all sites in 1998 and 1999, respectively, with two glyphosate applications but was occasionally less than 70% because of late emergence of annual grass and Amaranthus spp. or reduced control of Ipomoea spp. With a single application of glyphosate, corn grain yield was most often reduced when the application was delayed until weeds were 23 cm or taller. Averaged across all sites in 1998 and 1999, corn grain yields from a single glyphosate application at the 5-, 10-, 15-, 23-, and 30-cm timings were 93, 94, 93, 91, and 79% of the weed-free control, respectively. There was a significant effect of herbicide treatment on corn grain yield in 23 of the 35 sites when weed reinfestation was prevented with a second glyphosate application. When weed reinfestation was prevented, corn grain yield at the 5-, 10-, and 15-cm application timings was 101, 97, and 93% of the weed-free control, respectively, averaged across all sites. Results of this study suggested that the optimum timing for initial glyphosate application to avoid corn grain yield loss was when weeds were less than 10 cm in height, no more than 23 d after corn planting, and when corn growth was not more advanced than the V4 stage.

Keywords

GlyphosateAmaranthus spp. #3 AMASSIpomoea spp. # IPOSScorn, Zea mays L. ‘Roundup Ready®’ # SETFAHerbicide-resistant cropsweed interferencePOST, postemergence

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2003 , pp. 821 - 828
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, W. P. 1996. Weeds. in Weed Science Principles and Applications. 3rd ed. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing. Pp 13–15.Google Scholar
Carey, J. B. and Kells, J. J. 1995. Timing of total postemergence herbicide applications to maximize weed control and corn (Zea mays) yield. Weed Technol. 9:356–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, S. P. and Knezevic, S. Z. 2000. Critical period of weed control in corn as affected by nitrogen supply. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 55:151.Google Scholar
Ghosheh, H. Z., Holshouser, D. L., and Chandler, J. M. 1996. The critical period of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in field corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 44:944–947.Google Scholar
Halford, C., Hamill, A. S., Zhang, J., and Doucet, C. 2001. Critical period of weed control in no-till soybean and corn. Weed Technol. 15:737–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. R., Swanton, C. J., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 40:441–447.Google Scholar
Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberi with corn and soybeans. Weeds 10:26–29.Google Scholar
Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybeans. Weeds 13:331–334.Google Scholar
Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1969. Effect of time of giant foxtail removal from corn and soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:281–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1996. Control of annual weeds with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 10:957–962.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., and Westra, P. et al. 1999. Stability of corn (Zea mays)-foxtail (Setaria spp.) interference relationships. Weed Sci. 47:195–200.Google Scholar
Martin, S. G., Van Acker, R. C., and Friesen, L. F. 2001. Critical period of weed control in spring canola. Weed Sci. 49:326–333.Google Scholar
Moolani, M. K., Knake, E. L., and Slife, F. W. 1964. Competition of smooth pigweed with corn and soybeans. Weeds 12:126–128.Google Scholar
Santelmann, P. W., Meade, J. A., and Peters, R. A. 1963. Growth and development of yellow foxtail and giant foxtail. Weeds 11:139–142.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Alm, D. M. 1993. Survey results on environmental issues and weed science research priorities within the corn belt. Weed Technol. 7:763–770.Google Scholar
Tapia, L. S., Bauman, T. T., and Harvey, R. G. et al. 1997. Postemergence herbicide application timing effects on annual grass control and corn (Zea mays) grain yield. Weed Sci. 45:138–143.Google Scholar
Tharp, B. E. and Kells, J. J. 1999. Influence of herbicide application rate, timing, and interrow cultivation on weed control and corn (Zea mays) yield in glufosinate-resistant and glyphosate-resistant corn. Weed Technol. 13:807–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Acker, C. R., Swanton, C. J., and Weise, S. F. 1993. The critical period of weed control in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr]. Weed Sci. 41:194–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanGessel, M. J., Ayeni, A. O., and Majek, B. A. 2000. Optimum glyphosate timing with or without residual herbicides in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max) under full-season conventional tillage. Weed Technol. 14:140–149.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. E. and Tan, C. S. 1983. Critical period of weed interference in transplanted tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum): growth analysis. Weed Sci. 31:476–481.Google Scholar
Young, F. L., Wyse, D. L., and Jones, R. J. 1984. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) interference on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 32:226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 1988. The concept and application of the critical weed-free period. in Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M., eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. Pp. 145–155.Google Scholar