Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-dk7s8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T23:57:15.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regional variations in the relative sensitivity to UV light in the mouse retina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Jack B. Calderone  and
Gerald H. Jacobs
Jack B. Calderone
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara
Gerald H. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

About 3% of all mouse photoreceptors are cones. An earlier electrophysiological study indicated that there were two classes of cone in the mouse retina having peak sensitivities (λmax) of about 360 nm and 511 nm. Recent immunocytochemical results show there are two types of cones that have distinctive regional segregation patterns. We used regional stimulation of the retina in conjunction with electroretinogram (ERG) flicker photometry to see if the two cone types identified electrophysiologically are regionalized in a fashion suggested by the anatomical results. We find they are. Relative sensitivity to ultraviolet and visible light stimulation qualitatively parallels that predicted by immunocytochemical labelling. One result of this remarkable regionalization of cone types is that the mouse retina is relatively more sensitive to ultraviolet light stimulation when that light is directed toward the ventral half of the retina.

Keywords

Mouse conesPhotoreceptor distributionUltraviolet lightElectroretinogram

Information

Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , May 1995 , pp. 463 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bonaventure, N. (1961). Sur la sensibilite spectrale de l'appareil visuel chez le Souris. Compte Rendu Societe Biologic 155, 918–921.Google Scholar
Boynton, R.M. & Riggs, L.A. (1951). The effect of stimulus area and intensity upon the human retinal response. Journal of Experimental Psychology 42, 217–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bridges, C.D.B. (1959). The visual pigments of some common laboratory mammals. Nature 184, 1727–1728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter-Dawson, L.D. & La Vail, M.M. (1979). Rods and cones in the mouse retina. I. Structural analysis using light and electron microscopy. Journal of Comparative Neurology 188, 245–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curcio, C.A., Allen, K.A., Sloan, K.R., Lerea, C.L., Hurley, J.B., Klock, I.B. & Milam, A.H. (1991). Distribution and morphology of human cone photoreceptors stained with anit-blue opsin. Journal of Comparative Neurology 312, 610–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IIDeegan, J.F. & Jacobs, G.H. (1993). On the identity of the cone types of the rat retina. Experimental Eye Research 56, 375–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drager, U.C. & Hubel, D.H. (1978). Studies of visual function and its decay in mice with hereditary retinal degeneration. Journal of Comparative Neurology 180, 85–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellner, K.A. (1966). Das adaptive Verhalten der Mausenetzhaut. Albrecht v. Graefes Archiv fur klinische experimental Ophthalmologie 169, 166–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, G.H. (1981). Comparative Color Vision. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, G.H. (1993). The distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals. Biological Reviews 68, 413–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, G.H. & IIDeegan, J.F. (1994). Sensitivity to ultraviolet lights in the gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus): Characteristics and mechanisms. Vision Research 34, 1433–1441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, G.H. & Neitz, J. (1987). Inheritance of color vision in a New World monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 84, 2545–2549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, G.H. & Neitz, J. (1993). Electrophysiological estimates of individual variation in the L/M cone ratio. In Colour Vision Deficiencies XI, ed. Drum, B., pp. 107–112. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, G.H., Neitz, J. & IIDeegan, J.F. (1991). Retinal receptors in rodents maximally sensitive to ultraviolet light. Nature 353, 655–656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neitz, J. & Jacobs, G.H. (1984). Electroretinogram measurements of cone spectral sensitivity in dichromatic monkeys. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1, 1175–1180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peachey, N.S., Goto, Y., al-Ubaidi, M.R. & Naash, M.I. (1993). Properties of mouse cone-mediated electroretinogram during light adaptation. Neuroscience Letters 162, 9–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szel, A., Csorba, G., Caffe, A.R., Szel, G., Rohlich, P. & van Veen, T. (1994). Different patterns of retinal cone topography in two genera of rodents, Mus and Apodemus. Cell and Tissue Research 276, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szel, A., Rohlich, P., Caffe, A.R., Juliusson, B., Aguire, G. & van Veen, T. (1992). Unique separation of two spectral classes of cones in the mouse retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 325, 327–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szel, A., Rohlich, P., Miesiewska, K., Aguirre, G. & van Veen, T. (1993). Spatial and temporal differences between the expression of short- and middle-wave sensitive cone pigments in the mouse retina: A developmental study. Journal of Comparative Neurology 331, 564–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szel, A., Takacs, L., Monostori, E., Diamantstein, T., Vigh-Teichmann, I. & Rohlich, P. (1986). Monoclonal antibody-recognizing cone visual pigment. Experimental Eye Research 43, 871–883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamamoto, S. & Gouras, P. (1993). Color opponent neurons in mouse retina. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 19, 1257.Google Scholar