Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T21:45:35.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methods of Morpheme Quantification: Their Effect on the Interpretation of Second Language Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Teresa Pica
Teresa Pica
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Production of English grammatical morphemes has provided a fruitful data base for language acquisition research. However, questions have been raised as to how these data can best be analyzed to represent subjects' actual use of morphemes (Andersen 1977, Hakuta 1976, Hatch and Wagner-Gough 1976, Lightbown, Spada, and Wallace 1980, Stauble 1981). In the following study, application of different methods of morpheme quantification to the spontaneous speech data of 18 adults acquiring English as a second language led to conflicting interpretations regarding their morpheme production.

Application of two alternative methods of morpheme quantification—one by suppliance in obligatory contexts, the other by target-like use—resulted in substantially different percentages of accuracy for subjects' production of the morphemes progressive -ing, progressive auxiliary, and past irregular. Another set of methods, used to analyze plural -s—quantification by noun tokens and by noun types—yielded contradictory findings regarding subjects' production of this morpheme.

Results of this study demonstrate that data can be described in various ways depending on how morphemes are quantified. As a consequence of applying different analyses to the same data base, conflicting interpretations about subjects' interlanguage can occur.

Information

Type
Research Notes
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , Fall 1983 , pp. 69 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andersen, R. 1977. The impoverished state of cross-sectional morpheme acquisition/accuracy methodology. Working Papers on Bilingualism 14:47–82.Google Scholar
Bailey, N.C., Madden, C., and Krashen, S. D.. 1974. Is there a natural sequence in adult second language learning? Language Learning 27:235–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. and Burt, M.. 1974. Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 24:37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K. 1976. A case study of a Japanese child learning English as a second language. Language Learning 26:321–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatch, E. and Wagner-Gough, J.. 1976. Explaining sequence and variation in second language acquisition. In Brown, H. D. (ed), Papers in Second Language Acquisition, Special Issue No. 4, 39–58.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. 1977. Some issues relating to the monitor model. In Brown, H. D., Yorio, C. and Crymes, R. (eds), On TESOL '77 Washington, D.C.: TESOL.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P., Spada, N., and Wallace, R.. 1980. Some effects of instruction on child and adolescent ESL learners. In Krashen, S. and Scarcella, R. (eds.), Research in Second Language Acquisition: Selected Papers of the Los Angeles Second Language Acquisition Research Forum. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Pica, T. 1982. Second Language Acquisition in Different Language Contexts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Pica, T. In press. Adult acquisition of English as a second language in different language contexts. Language Learning.Google Scholar
Richards, Jack. 1974. Error analysis and second language strategies, In Schumann, J. and Stenson, N. (eds.) New Frontiers in Second Language Learning. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House, 32–53.Google Scholar
Rosansky, E. 1976. Methods and morphemes in second language acquisition. Language Learning 26:409–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauble, A-M. 1981. A comparison of a Spanish-English and Japanese-English second language continuum: verb phrase morphology. Paper presented at the first Europe-North American workshop on cross-linguistic second language acquisition research, Lake Arrowhead, Cal.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. 1975. The use of overgeneralization and transfer learning strategies by elementary and intermediate students in ESL. Language Learning 25:73–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar