Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-jtdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T09:33:13.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpreting biological variation: seeds, populations and sensitivity thresholds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2018

Kent J. Bradford
Kent J. Bradford*
Affiliation:
Seed Biotechnology Center, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Kent J. Bradford, Email: kjbradford@ucdavis.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seeds offer a unique perspective from which to view biology. An individual seed is an autonomous biological entity that must rely on its own resources (and resourcefulness) to persist after dispersal and to time its transition to germination and seedling growth to coincide with environmental opportunities for survival. At the same time, seed biology in agriculture and ecology is determined largely by the behaviours of populations of individual seeds. The percentage of seeds in a population that is in a particular state (e.g. dormant, germinated, dead) at a given time is a fundamental metric of seed biology. This duality of individual diversity underlying consistent population-wide behaviour patterns can be described quantitatively using population-based threshold (PBT) models. While conceptually simple, these models are highly flexible and can describe the wide diversity of responses of seed populations to temperature, water potential, hormones, oxygen, light, ageing and combinations of these factors. This seed behaviour is linked to respiratory rates of individual seeds, indicating that basic metabolic processes within seeds vary among individuals in accordance with PBT principles. Looking more broadly across microbial, plant and animal biology, examples of cellular diversity in hormonal sensitivity, gene expression, developmental responses and signalling abound. This variation often is termed ‘noise’, and analysis efforts are focused on extracting mean signals from this variation to understand regulatory pathways. However, extension of the PBT approach to the cellular and molecular levels suggests that population sensitivity distributions and recruitment phenomena may underlie many fundamental biological processes. Thus, concepts and quantitative approaches developed for the analysis of seed populations can be applied across biological scales from molecules to ecosystems to interpret inherent biological variation and provide mechanistic insights into the nature of biological regulatory systems.

Keywords

germinationmodelspopulationssensitivitythresholdsvariation

Information

Type
Review Paper
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 28 , Special Issue 3: Seeds as Systems , September 2018 , pp. 158 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allen, PS et al. (2007) Modeling of seed dormancy. In Bradford, KJ and Nonogaki, H (eds), Seed Development, Dormancy and Germination. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 72–112.Google Scholar
Alvarado, V and Bradford, KJ (2002) A hydrothermal time model explains the cardinal temperatures for seed germination. Plant Cell and Environment 25, 1061–1069.Google Scholar
Alvarado, V and Bradford, KJ (2005) Hydrothermal time analysis of seed dormancy in true (botanical) potato seeds. Seed Science Research 15, 77–88.Google Scholar
Angel, A et al. (2011) A Polycomb-based switch underlying quantitative epigenetic memory. Nature 476, 105–108.Google Scholar
Angel, A et al. (2015) Vernalizing cold is registered digitally at FLC. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 4146–4151.Google Scholar
Avrahami, D et al. (2017) β-Cells are not uniform after all – novel insights into molecular heterogeneity of insulin-secreting cells. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 19, 147–152.Google Scholar
Bair, NB, Meyer, SE and Allen, PS (2006) A hydrothermal after-ripening time model for seed dormancy loss in Bromus tectorum L. Seed Science Research 16, 17–28.Google Scholar
Bandara, HMHN et al. (2012) Microbial chemical signaling: a current perspective. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 38, 217–249.Google Scholar
Barth, CW et al. (2015) Hydrothermal time models for conidial germination and mycelial growth of the seed pathogen Pyrenophora semeniperda. Fungal Biology 119, 720–730.Google Scholar
Batlla, D and Agostinelli, AM (2017) Thermal regulation of secondary dormancy induction in Polygonum aviculare seeds: a quantitative analysis using the hydrotime model. Seed Science Research 27, 231–242.Google Scholar
Batlla, D and Benech-Arnold, RL (2015) A framework for the interpretation of temperature effects on dormancy and germination in seed populations showing dormancy. Seed Science Research 25, 147–158.Google Scholar
Bello, P and Bradford, KJ (2016) Single-seed oxygen consumption measurements and population-based threshold models link respiration and germination rates under diverse conditions. Seed Science Research 26, 199–221.Google Scholar
Bewley, JD et al. (2013) Seeds: Physiology of Development, Germination and Dormancy (3rd edition). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Bierhuizen, JF and Wagenvoort, WA (1974) Some aspects of seed germination in vegetables. I. The determination and application of heat sums and minimum temperature for germination. Scientia Horticulturae 2, 213–219.Google Scholar
Blair, DF (1995) How bacteria sense and swim. Annual Review of Microbiology 49, 489–520.Google Scholar
Blakely, LM et al. (1972) Control and kinetics of branch root formation in cultured root segments of Haplopappus ravenii. Plant Physiology 50, 35–42.Google Scholar
Bliss, CI (1934) The method of probits. Science 79, 38–39.Google Scholar
Bradford, KJ (1990) A water relations analysis of seed germination rates. Plant Physiology 94, 840–849.Google Scholar
Bradford, KJ (1995) Water relations in seed germination. In Kigel, J and Galili, G (eds), Seed Development and Germination. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc, pp. 351–396.Google Scholar
Bradford, KJ (2005) Threshold models applied to seed germination ecology. New Phytologist 165, 338–341.Google Scholar
Bradford, KJ et al. (2008) Quantifying the sensitivity of barley seed germination to oxygen, abscisic acid and gibberellin using a population-based threshold model. Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 335–347.Google Scholar
Bradford, KJ, Côme, D and Corbineau, F (2007) Quantifying the oxygen sensitivity of seed germination using a population-based threshold model. Seed Science Research 17, 33–43.Google Scholar
Bradford, KJ and Haigh, AM (1994) Relationship between accumulated hydrothermal time during seed priming and subsequent seed germination rates. Seed Science Research 4, 63–69.Google Scholar
Bradford, KJ and Somasco, OA (1994) Water relations of lettuce seed thermoinhibition. I. Priming and endosperm effects on base water potential. Seed Science Research 4, 1–10.Google Scholar
Bradford, KJ, Tarquis, AM and Duran, JM (1993) A population-based threshold model describing the relationship between germination rates and seed deterioration. Journal of Experimental Botany 44, 1225–1234.Google Scholar
Bradford, KJ and Trewavas, AJ (1994) Sensitivity thresholds and variable time scales in plant hormone action. Plant Physiology 105, 1029–1036.Google Scholar
Buckley, TN (2017) Modeling stomatal conductance. Plant Physiology 174, 572–582.Google Scholar
Burghardt, LT et al. (2015) Modeling the influence of genetic and environmental variation on the expression of plant life cycles across landscapes. The American Naturalist 185, 212–227.Google Scholar
Cao, J et al. (2017) Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science 357, 661–667.Google Scholar
Chalancon, G et al. (2012) Interplay between gene expression noise and regulatory network architecture. Trends in Genetics 28, 221–232.Google Scholar
Covell, S et al. (1986) The influence of temperature on seed germination rate in grain legumes. 1. A comparison of chickpea, lentil, soybean and cowpea at constant temperatures. Journal of Experimental Botany 37, 705–715.Google Scholar
Dahal, P and Bradford, KJ (1994) Hydrothermal time analysis of tomato seed germination at suboptimal temperature and reduced water potential. Seed Science Research 4, 71–80.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S, Lau, H and Kouider, S (2017) What is consciousness, and could machines have it? Science 358, 486–492.Google Scholar
Donohue, K et al. (2015) Applying developmental threshold models to evolutionary ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 30, 66–77.Google Scholar
Downton, WJS, Loveys, BR and Grant, WJR (1988) Non-uniform stomatal closure induced by water stress causes putative non-stomatal inhibition of photosynthesis. New Phytologist 110, 503–509.Google Scholar
Eldar, A and Elowitz, MB (2010) Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits. Nature 467, 167–173.Google Scholar
Ellis, RH (1988) The viability equation, seed viability nomographs, and practical advice on seed storage. Seed Science and Technology 16, 29–50.Google Scholar
Ellis, RH and Roberts, EH (1980) Improved equations for the prediction of seed longevity. Annals of Botany 45, 13–30.Google Scholar
Ellis, RH and Roberts, EH (1981) The quantification of aging and survival in orthodox seeds. Seed Science and Technology 9, 373–409.Google Scholar
Finch-Savage, WE and Bassel, GW (2016) Seed vigour and crop establishment: extending performance beyond adaptation. Journal of Experimental Botany 67, 567–591.Google Scholar
Finch-Savage, WE and Leubner-Metzger, G (2006) Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytologist 171, 501–523.Google Scholar
Finch, H, Allen, PS and Meyer, SE (2013) Environmental factors influencing Pyrenophora semeniperda-caused seed mortality in Bromus tectorum. Seed Science Research 23, 57–66.Google Scholar
Garcia-Huidobro, J, Monteith, JL and Squire, GR (1982) Time, temperature and germination of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides S and H). I. Constant temperature. Journal of Experimental Botany 33, 288–296.Google Scholar
Garcia Hernan, G et al. (2013) Quantitative imaging of transcription in living Drosophila embryos links polymerase activity to patterning. Current Biology 23, 2140–2145.Google Scholar
Gillies, TE et al. (2017) Linear integration of ERK activity predominates over persistence detection in Fra-1 regulation. Cell Systems 5, 549–563.Google Scholar
Gilroy, S and Trewavas, A (2001) Signal processing and transduction in plant cells: the end of the beginning? Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2, 307–314.Google Scholar
Gremer, JR, Kimball, S and Venable, DL (2016) Within-and among-year germination in Sonoran Desert winter annuals: bet hedging and predictive germination in a variable environment. Ecology Letters 19, 1209–1218.Google Scholar
Groot, SPC et al. (1988) Gibberellin-induced hydrolysis of endosperm cell-walls in gibberellin-deficient tomato seeds prior to radicle protrusion. Planta 174, 500–504.Google Scholar
Gummerson, RJ (1986) The effect of constant temperatures and osmotic potential on the germination of sugar beet. Journal of Experimental Botany 37, 729–741.Google Scholar
Guseman, JM et al. (2015) Auxin-induced degradation dynamics set the pace for lateral root development. Development 142, 905–909.Google Scholar
Halmer, P, Bewley, J and Thorpe, T (1978) Degradation of endosperm cell walls of Lactuca sativa L., cv. Grand Rapids. Planta 139, 1–8.Google Scholar
Hawkins, KK, Allen, PS and Meyer, SE (2017) Secondary dormancy induction and release in Bromus tectorum seeds: the role of temperature, water potential and hydrothermal time. Seed Science Research 27, 12–25.Google Scholar
Hellingwerf, KJ (2005) Bacterial observations: a rudimentary form of intelligence? Trends in Microbiology 13, 152–158.Google Scholar
Hillmer, S, Gilroy, S and Jones, RL (1993) Visualizing enzyme secretion from individual barley (Hordeum vulgare) aleurone protoplasts. Plant Physiology 102, 279–286.Google Scholar
Huang, Z et al. (2016) The contribution of germination functional traits to population dynamics of a desert plant community. Ecology 97, 250–261.Google Scholar
Karaiskos, N et al. (2017) The Drosophila embryo at single-cell transcriptome resolution. Science 358, 194–199.Google Scholar
Laisk, AGU (1983) Calculation of leaf photosynthetic parameters considering the statistical distribution of stomatal apertures. Journal of Experimental Botany 34, 1627–1635.Google Scholar
Laisk, AGU, Oja, V and Kull, K (1980) Statistical distribution of stomatal apertures of Vicia faba and Hordeum vulgare and the Spannungsphase of stomatal opening. Journal of Experimental Botany 31, 49–58.Google Scholar
Le, BH et al. (2010) Global analysis of gene activity during Arabidopsis seed development and identification of seed-specific transcription factors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 8063–8070.Google Scholar
Mesibov, R, Ordal, GW and Adler, J (1973) The range of attractant concentrations for bacterial chemotaxis and the threshold and size of response over this range. Journal of General Physiology 62, 203–223.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J, Johnston, IG and Bassel, GW (2017) Variability in seeds: biological, ecological, and agricultural implications. Journal of Experimental Botany 68, 809–817.Google Scholar
Mott, KA and Buckley, TN (2000) Patchy stomatal conductance: emergent collective behaviour of stomata. Trends in Plant Science 5, 258–262.Google Scholar
Mott, KA and Peak, D (2007) Stomatal patchiness and task-performing networks. Annals of Botany 99, 219–226.Google Scholar
Ni, BR and Bradford, KJ (1992) Quantitative models characterizing seed germination responses to abscisic acid and osmoticum. Plant Physiology 98, 1057–1068.Google Scholar
Ni, BR and Bradford, KJ (1993) Germination and dormancy of abscisic acid-deficient and gibberellin-deficient mutant tomato seeds. Sensitivity of germination to abscisic acid, gibberellin, and water potential. Plant Physiology 101, 607–617.Google Scholar
Nonogaki, H, Gee, OH and Bradford, KJ (2000) A germination-specific endo-β-mannanase gene is expressed in the micropylar endosperm cap of tomato seeds. Plant Physiology 123, 1235–1245.Google Scholar
Nonogaki, H and Morohashi, Y (1999) Temporal and spatial pattern of the development of endo-beta-mannanase activity in germinating and germinated lettuce seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany 50, 1307–1313.Google Scholar
Orman-Ligeza, B et al. (2013) Post-embryonic root organogenesis in cereals: branching out from model plants. Trends in Plant Science 18, 459–467.Google Scholar
Pluskota, WE, Bradford, KJ and Nonogaki, H (2011) Tissue printing methods for localization of RNA and proteins that control seed dormancy and germination. In Kermode, AR (ed), Seed Dormancy: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 329–339.Google Scholar
Radin, JW (1992) Reconciling water-use efficiencies of cotton in field and laboratory. Crop Science 32, 13–18.Google Scholar
Raser, JM and O'Shea, EK (2005) Noise in gene expression: origins, consequences, and control. Science 309, 2010–2013.Google Scholar
Roberts, EH (1961) Dormancy of rice seed. I. The distribution of dormancy periods. Journal of Experimental Botany 12, 319–329.Google Scholar
Roberts, EH (1973) Predicting the storage life of seeds. Seed Science and Technology 1, 499–514.Google Scholar
Rodbard, D (1973) Theory of hormone-receptor interaction. III. The endocrine target cell as a quantal response unit: a general control mechanism. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 36, 342–364.Google Scholar
Rowse, HR and Finch-Savage, WE (2003) Hydrothermal threshold models can describe the germination response of carrot (Daucus carota L.) and onion (Allium cepa L.) seed populations across both sub and supra-optimal temperatures. New Phytologist 157, 101–108.Google Scholar
Salehin, M, Bagchi, R and Estelle, M (2015) SCFTIR1/AFB-based auxin perception: mechanism and role in plant growth and development. The Plant Cell 27, 9–19.Google Scholar
Salomon, D and Meda, P (1986) Heterogeneity and contact-dependent regulation of hormone secretion by individual B cells. Experimental Cell Research 162, 507–520.Google Scholar
Selimkhanov, J et al. (2014) Accurate information transmission through dynamic biochemical signaling networks. Science 346, 1370–1373.Google Scholar
Serizawa, S, Miyamichi, K and Sakano, H (2004) One neuron–one receptor rule in the mouse olfactory system. Trends in Genetics 20, 648–653.Google Scholar
Sparta, B et al. (2015) Receptor level mechanisms are required for epidermal growth factor (EGF)-stimulated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activity pulses. Journal of Biological Chemistry 290, 24784–24792.Google Scholar
Stadler, MR and Eisen, MB (2017) Atlas…t, patterns from every cell. Science 358, 172–173.Google Scholar
Still, DW and Bradford, KJ (1997) Endo-beta-mannanase activity from individual tomato endosperm caps and radicle tips in relation to germination rates. Plant Physiology 113, 21–29.Google Scholar
Still, DW and Bradford, KJ (1998) Using hydrotime and ABA-time models to quantify seed quality of Brassicas during development. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 123, 692–699.Google Scholar
Still, DW, Dahal, P and Bradford, KJ (1997) A single-seed assay for endo-beta-mannanase activity from tomato endosperm and radicle tissues. Plant Physiology 113, 13–20.Google Scholar
Terashima, I et al. (1988) Characterisation of non-uniform photosynthesis induced by abscisic acid in leaves having different mesophyll anatomies. Plant and Cell Physiology 29, 385–394.Google Scholar
Topham, AT et al. (2017) Temperature variability is integrated by a spatially embedded decision-making center to break dormancy in Arabidopsis seeds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 114, 6629–6634.Google Scholar
Trewavas, AJ (2012) Information, noise and communication: thresholds as controlling elements in development In Witzany, G and Baluska, F (eds), Biocommunication of Plants. Signaling and Communication in Plants, vol. 14. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 11–35.Google Scholar
Trewavas, AJ (2014) Plant Behaviour and Intelligence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, DL et al. (2005) Thermal time – concepts and utility. Annals of Applied Biology 146, 1–14.Google Scholar
Valdeolmillos, M, Gomis, A and Sánchez-Andrés, JV (1996) In vivo synchronous membrane potential oscillations in mouse pancreatic beta-cells: lack of co-ordination between islets. Journal of Physiology 493, 9–18.Google Scholar
Van Schravendijk, CF, Kiekens, R and Pipeleers, DG (1992) Pancreatic beta cell heterogeneity in glucose-induced insulin secretion. Journal of Biological Chemistry 267, 21344–21348.Google Scholar
Wu, CT and Bradford, KJ (2003) Class I chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase are differentially regulated by wounding, methyl jasmonate, ethylene, and gibberellin in tomato seeds and leaves. Plant Physiology 133, 263–273.Google Scholar
Wu, CT et al. (2001) Class I beta-1,3-glucanase and chitinase are expressed in the micropylar endosperm of tomato seeds prior to radicle emergence. Plant Physiology 126, 1299–1313.Google Scholar