Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-s6l46 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-26T10:27:41.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LOGICAL GROUNDS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2013

FABRICE CORREIA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Symbolic Logic , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 31 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aristotle. Metaphysics. In Barnes, J., editor. The Complete Works of Aristotle (fourth edition). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, P. (2012). A clarification and defense of the notion of grounding. In Correia, F., and Schnieder, B., editors. Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, R. (2010). Grounds and consequences. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 80, 65–77.Google Scholar
Correia, F. (2005). Existential Dependence and Cognate Notions. Munich, Germany: Philosophia.Google Scholar
Correia, F. (2008). Ontological dependence. Philosophy Compass, 3(5), 1013–1032.Google Scholar
Correia, F. (2010). Grounding and truth-functions. Logique et Analyse, 53(211), 251–279.Google Scholar
Correia, F. (2011). From grounding to truth-making: Some thoughts. In Reboul, A., editor. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan. Available from: http://www.philosophie.ch/kevin/festschrift/.Google Scholar
Correia, F. & Schnieder, B., editors (2012). Grounding: An opinionated introduction. In Correia, F., and Schnieder, B. editors. Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, L. (1979). An alternate formulation of Kripke’s theory of truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(1), 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K. (1978). Model theory for modal logic. Part I—The “De Re/De Dicto” distinction. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 7(2), 125–156.Google Scholar
Fine, K. (2001). The question of realism. Philosophers Imprint, 1(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Fine, K. (2010). Some puzzles of ground. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 51(1), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K. (2012a). The pure logic of ground. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 5(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K. (2012b). Guide to ground. In Correia, F., and Schnieder, B., editors. Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzen, G. (1969). Investigations concerning logical deduction. In Szabo, M., editor. The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland, pp. 68–131.Google Scholar
Hazen, A. (1981). Davis’s formulation of Kripke’s theory of truth: A correction. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 10(3), 309–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. (1975). Outline of a theory of truth. Journal of Philosophy, 72, 690–716.Google Scholar
Leitgeb, H. (2005). What truth depends on. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 34(2), 155–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litland, J. E. (2012). Natural deduction for logics of ground. Manuscript, University of Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
Priest, G. (2008.) An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, M. J. (2012). In defense of ground. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 90, 687–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, G. (2010). Metaphysical dependence: Grounding and reduction. In Hale, B., and Hoffmann, A., editors. Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnieder, B. (2011). A logic for ‘because’. Review of Symbolic Logic, 4, 445–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnieder, B. (2012). On ground and consequence. Manuscript, University of Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
Tatzel, A. (2001). Proving and grounding. Bolzano’s theory of grounding and Gentzen’s normal proofs. Manuscript, University of Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Trogdon, K. (2013). An introduction to grounding. In Hoeltje, M., Schnieder, B., and Steinberg, A., editors. Varieties of Dependence: Ontological Dependence, Grounding, Supervenience, Response-Dependence. Munich, Germany: Philosophia, pp. 97–122.Google Scholar
Yablo, S. (1982). Grounding, dependence, and paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11(1), 117–137.Google Scholar