Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-jtdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T16:46:18.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon Calibration Curve Variations and Their Implications for the Interpretation of New Zealand Prehistory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

B.G. McFadgen ,
F. B. Knox  and
T. R. L. Cole
B.G. McFadgen
Affiliation:
Conservation Sciences Centre, Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 10420, Wellington, New Zealand
F. B. Knox
Affiliation:
900 Ohariu Valley Road, R.D., Johnsonville, New Zealand
T. R. L. Cole
Affiliation:
Department of Labour, P. O. Box 3705, Wellington, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The shape of a distribution of calibrated 14C dates displays spurious peaks and troughs, brought about by changes in the slope of the calibration curve interacting with the spreading effect of the stochastic distribution of counting errors. The distortion results in a positive correlation between the numbers of dates per calendar year and the slopes of the calibration curves, for assemblages of archaeological dates from such widely separated areas as British Columbia, South Australia and New Zealand. The distortion also increases the possibility of date reversals, and increases the overall spread of calibrated 14C dates. After taking into account this systematic distortion and inbuilt age of charcoal and wood samples, we estimate dates for the initial settlement and first appearance of fortifications, and infer a likely trend of population growth for prehistoric New Zealand.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , 1994 , pp. 221 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Anderson, A. J. 1991 The chronology of colonisation in New Zealand. Antiquity 65: 767–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A. J. and McFadgen, B. G. 1990 Prehistoric two-way voyaging between New Zealand and East Polynesia: Mayor Island obsidian on Raoul Island, and possible Raoul Island obsidian in New Zealand. Archaeology in Oceania 25: 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, C. F. M. and Frankel, D. 1991 Chronology and explanation in western Victoria and south-east South Australia. Archaeology in Oceania 26: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewis, A. A., Molloy, M. A. and Sutton, D. G. 1990 Modelling the prehistoric Maori population. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 81: 343–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, J. M. 1984 The Prehistory of New Zealand. Auckland, Longman Paul: 270 p.Google Scholar
Dye, T. and Komori, E. 1993 A pre-censal population history of Hawaii. New Zealand Journal of Archaeology 14: 113–128.Google Scholar
Geyh, M. A. 1980 Holocene sea-level history: Case study of the statistical evaluation of 14C dates. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds, Proceedings of the 10th International 14C conference. Radiocarbon 22(3): 695–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R. C. 1967 Sources of New Zealand's East Polynesian culture: The evidence of a pearl shell lure shank. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 2: 81–90.Google Scholar
Irwin, G. 1992 The Prehistoric Exploration and Colonisation of the Pacific. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 240 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFadgen, B. G. 1982 Dating New Zealand archaeology by radiocarbon. New Zealand Journal of Science 25: 379–392.Google Scholar
McFadgen, B. G. 1994 Coastal stratigraphic evidence for human settlement. In Sutton, D. G., ed., The Origins of the First New Zealanders. Auckland, Auckland University Press: 195–207.Google Scholar
McFadgen, B. G. and Manning, M. R. 1990 Calibrating New Zealand radiocarbon dates of marine shells. Radiocarbon 32(2): 229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, T. H. and Rousseau, M. K. 1987 Late Prehistoric Cultural Horizons on the Canadian Plateau. Department of Archaeology Simon Fraser University Publication 16: 102 p.Google Scholar
Simmons, D. R. 1976 The Great New Zealand Myth: A Study of the Discovery and Origin Traditions of the Maori. Wellington, Reed: 504 p.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967 Statistical Methods. Ames, The Iowa State University Press: 593 p.Google Scholar
Stolk, A., Hogervorst, K. and Berendsen, H. 1989 Correcting 14C histograms for the non-linearity of the radiocarbon time scale. Radiocarbon 31(2): 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Braziunas, T. F. 1993 Modeling atmospheric 14C influences and 14C ages of marine samples to 10,000 bc. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 137–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Pearson, G. W. 1993 High-precision bidecadal calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, ad 1950–500 bc and 2500–6000 bc. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Polach, H. 1977 Discussion: Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3): 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Reimer, P. J. 1989 Histograms obtained from computerized radiocarbon age calibration. In Long, A., Kra, R. S. and Srdoč, D., eds, Proceedings of the 13th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 31(3): 817–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Reimer, P. J. 1993 Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.014C age calibration program. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, J. C., Fuls, A., Visser, E. and Becker, B. 1993 Pretoria calibration curve for short-lived samples, 1930–3350 bc. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar