Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wxk4p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T06:22:27.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Groningen Radiocarbon DatesVI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

J. C. Vogel  and
W. H. Zagwijn
J. C. Vogel
Affiliation:
University of Groningen*
W. H. Zagwijn
Affiliation:
Geological Survey, Haarlem**
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This list contains dates related to the chronology ofthe last glaciation in Europe. Since several of theolder results which already have appeared in printneed correction or re-interpretation it wasconsidered necessary to incorporate as many of themas possible into this list. Notably the datespublished by de Vries (1958) are included here andreconsidered in the light of our presentunderstanding of the climatic succession. It isnoteworthy that, although the interpretation mayhave changed slightly, most of those measurementsare still as valid today as they were eight yearsago.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , 1967 , pp. 63 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

Footnotes

*

Physics Laboratory, Westersingel 34,Groningen.

**

Geological Survey, Spaarne, Haarlem,Netherlands.

References

Ackermann, E., 1954, Gliederung, Kinematik und paläoklimatische Bedeutung der würmeiszeitlichen Ablagerungen in Göttingen: Mitt. Geol. Staats-inst. in Hamburg, v. 23. p. 126–141.Google Scholar
Andersen, S. T., 1957, New investigations of interglacial fresh-water deposits in Jutland. A preliminary report: Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, v. 8. p. 181–186.Google Scholar
Andersen, S. T., 1961, Vegetation and its environment in Denmark in the Early Weichselian Glacial (last Glacial): Danm. Geol. Unders. II rk, nr. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, S. T., de Vries, H. and Zagwijn, W. H., 1960. Climatic change and radiocarbon dating in the Weichselian Glacial of Denmark and the Netherlands: Geol. en Mijnbouw, v. 39, p. 38–42.Google Scholar
Averdieck, F. R., 1967. Die Vegetationsentwicklung des Eem-Interglacials und der Frühwürm Interstadiale von Odderade - Schleswig-Holstein: Fundamenta. v. 2.Google Scholar
Bächler, E., 1921, Das Drachenloch ob Bättis im Taminatale, 2445 m ü. M.: St. Gallen, 144 P.Google Scholar
Bennema, J. and Pons, L. J., 1957, The excavation at Velsen. Pleistocene deposits: Verh. Kon. Ned. Geol.-Mijnb. Gen., Geol. serie, v. 17.Google Scholar
Bertsch, K., 1925, Eine interglaziale Flora aus Oberschwaben: Allgem. Bot. Zeitschrift v. 28/29. p. 2–15.Google Scholar
Blanc, A. C., de Vries, Hl. and Follieri, M., 1957, A first C14 date for the Würm I chronology on the Italian coast: Quaternaria, v. 4, p. 1–11.Google Scholar
Brandtner, F., 1961, More on Upper Palaeolithic archaeology. Comments: Current Anthropol., v. 2, p. 427–454.Google Scholar
Brunnacker, K., 1956, Regionale Bodendifferenzierungen während der Würmeiszeit: Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, v. 7, p. 43–48.Google Scholar
Brunnacker, K., 1962, Bemerkungen zum Profil Hörmating/Obb.: Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, v. 13, p. 125–128.Google Scholar
Cnossen, J. and Zandstra, J. G., 1965, De oude Boorneloop in Friesland en veen uit de Paudorftijd nabij Heerenveen: Boor en Spade, v. 14, p. 62–87.Google Scholar
Coope, G. R., 1962, A Pleistocene coleopterous fauna with arctic affinities from Fladbury, Worcestershire: Quaternary Jour. of Geol. Soc. London, v. 118, p. 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coope, G. R., et al., 1961, A Late-Pleistocene fauna and flora from Upton Warren, Worcestershire: Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London, Ser. B., Biol. Sci., no. 714. v. 244.Google Scholar
van Dorsser, H. J., 1956, Het landschap van westelijk Noord-Brabant: . Utrecht.Google Scholar
Ebers, E., 1960, Drumlinkerne, ältere Würmschotter und das Würm-Interstadial-Profil von Hörmating/Obb.: Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, v. 11, p. 64–76.Google Scholar
Felgenauer, F., Fink, J. and de Vries, Hl., 1959, Studien zur absoluten und relativen Chronologie der fossilen Böden in Österreich. I. Oberfellabrunn: Archaeol. Austriaca, v. 25, p. 35–73.Google Scholar
Fink., J., 1961, Die Gliederung des Jungpleistozäns in Österreich: Mitt. der Geol. Ges. in Wien, v. 54, p. 1–25Google Scholar
Fink., J., 1962, Studien zur absoluten und relativen Chronologie der fossilen Böden in Österreich. II. Wetzleindorf und Stillfried: Archaeol. Austriaca, v. 31. p. 1–18.Google Scholar
Firbas, F., 1927, Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Schieferkohlen des Inntals und der interglazialen Waldgeschichte der Ostalphen: Zeitschr. f. Gletscherkunde, v. 15, p. 261–277.Google Scholar
Florschütz, F., 1957, The excavation at Velsen, the flora of the Eemian and the Tubantian: Verh. Kon. Ned. Geol.-Mijnb. Gen., Geol. Serie, v. 17.Google Scholar
Florschütz, F., 1958, Steppen- und Salzsumpfelemente aus den Floren der letzten und vorletzten Eiszeit in den Niederlanden: Flora, v. 146, p. 489–492.Google Scholar
Gross, H., 1958, Die bisherigen Ergebnisse von C-14 Messungen und paläontologischen Untersuchungen für die Gliederung der Chronologie des Jungpleistozäns in Mitteleuropa und den Nachbargebieten: Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, v. 9. p. 155–187.Google Scholar
van der Hammen, T., Maarleveld, G. C., Vogel, J. C. and Zagwijn, W. H., 1967, Stratigraphy, climatic succession and radiocarbon dating of the last glacial in the Netherlands: Geol. en Mijnb., v. 46, no. 3.Google Scholar
Iversen, J., 1936, Sekundäres Pollen als Fehlerquelle: Danm. Geol. Unders., IV raekke, v. 2, no. 15, p. 3–24.Google Scholar
Jelgersma, S., 1961, Holocene sea level changes in the Netherlands: Med. v. d. Geol. Stichting, serie C-VI, no. 7.Google Scholar
Klima, B., Kukla, J., Ložek, V. and de Vries, H., 1962, Stratigraphie des Pleistozäns und Alter des paläeolithischen Rastplatzes in der Ziegelei von Dolní Vestonice (Unter-Wisternitz): Anthropozoicum, v. 11, p. 93–145.Google Scholar
Kolumbe, F., 1955, Über interglaziale und interstadiale Bildungen von Loopstedt am Haddebyer Moor bei Schleswig: Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, v. 6, p. 39–40.Google Scholar
Kukla, J. and Klima, B., 1961, More on Upper Palaeolithic archaeology. Comments: Current Anthropol., v. 2, p. 427–454.Google Scholar
Lüdi, W., 1953, Die Pflanzenwelt des Eiszeitalters im nördlichen Vorland der Schweizer Alpen: Veröffentl. des Geobot. Inst. Rübel in Zürich, v. 27, p. 1–208.Google Scholar
Maarleveld, G. C., 1962, The Veluwe: Med. Geol. Stichting, N.S. v.15, p. 49–54.Google Scholar
Movius, H. L., 1960, Radiocarbon dates and Upper Palaeolithic archaeology in central and western Europe: Current Anthropol., v. 1, p. 355–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musil, R., 1962, Zur Problematik der Datierung von Würmsedimenten auf der Basis paläontologischer Funde: Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, v. 13, p. 112–113.Google Scholar
Musil, R., Valoch, K. et al., 1965, Die Erforschung der Höhle Pod hradem 1956–1958: Anthropos no. 18, Brno, 149 P.Google Scholar
Paas, W., 1962, Rezente und fossile Böden auf niederrheinischen Terrassen und deren Deckschichten: Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, v. 12, p. 165–230.Google Scholar
Pittioni, R., 1954, Urgeschichte des österreichischen Raumes: Wien.Google Scholar
Reich, H., 1953, Die Vegetationsentwicklung der Interglaziale von Grossweil-Ohlstadt und Pfefferbichl im Bayerischen Alpenvorland: Flora, v. 140, p. 386–443.Google Scholar
Remv, H., 1960, Der Löss am unteren Mittel- und Niederrhein: Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, v. 11, p. 107–120.Google Scholar
Rutkowski, F., 1960, Le Quaternaire de la Haute-Plaine de N Konin: Man. dans Archives Inst. Geol, Warszawa.Google Scholar
Simpson, I. M. and West, R. G., 1958, On the stratigraphy and paleobotany of a Late-Pleistocene organic deposit at Chelford, Cleshire: New Phytologist, v. 57, p. 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, H., 1960a, Copenhagen natural radiocarbon measurements III: Am. Jour. Sci. Radioc. Supp., v. 2, p. 5–11.Google Scholar
Tauber, H., 1960b, Copenhagen natural radiocarbon measurements IV: Am. Jour. Sci. Radioc. Supp., v. 2, p. 12–25.Google Scholar
Tauber, H., 1962, Copenhagen radiocarbon dates V: Radiocarbon, v. 4, p. 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, H. and deVries, Hl., 1958, Radiocarbon measurements of Würm-interstadial samples from Jutland: Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, v. 9, p. 69–71.Google Scholar
Tode, A., Preul, F., Richter, K., et al., 1953, Die Untersuchung der paläolithischen Freilandstation von Salzgitter-Lebenstedt: Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, v. 3, p. 144–220.Google Scholar
Tralau, H., and Zagwijn, W. H., 1962, Fossil Salix Polaris Wahlberg in the Netherlands: Acta Botanica, v. 11, p. 425–427.Google Scholar
Valoch, K., 1961, More on Upper Palaeolithic archaeology. Comment: Current Anthropol., v. 2, p. 448.Google Scholar
Vanhoorne, R., and Paepe, R., 1966, Livret-Guide de l'excursion D, 2nd Internat. Conf. on Palynology: Utrecht.Google Scholar
van der Vlerk, I. M., and Florschütz, F., 1950, Nederland in het IJstijdvak: Utrecht, p. 287.Google Scholar
van der Vlerk, I. M., and Florschütz, F., 1953, The palaeontological base of the subdivision of the Pleistocene in the Netherlands: Verh. der Kon. Ned. Akad. v. Wetensch., afd. Natuurk., v. 20, no. 2.Google Scholar
Vogel, J. C., and van der Hammen, T., 1967, The Denekamp and Paudorf interstadials: Geol. en Mijnb., v. 46, no. 3.Google Scholar
Vogel, J. C., and Waterbolk, H. T., 1963, Groningen radiocarbon dates IV: Radiocarbon, v. 5, p. 163–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Hl., 1958, Radiocarbon dates for Upper Eem and Würm-interstadial samples: Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, v. 9, p. 10–17.Google Scholar
de Vries, Hl., 1959, Radiocarbon dating of the fossile soils at Ober Feilabrun: Proc. Kon. Akad. Wetensch., Series B, v. 62, p. 84–91.Google Scholar
de Vries, H., Barendsen, G. W., and Waterbolk, H. T., 1958, Groningen radiocarbon dates II: Science, v. 127, p. 129–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Vries, H., and Waterbolk, H. T., 1958, Groningen radiocarbon dates III: Science, v. 128, p. 1550–1556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggers, A. J., 1955, De wording van het Noordoostpoldergebied: , Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W. H., 1961, Vegetation, climate and radiocarbon datings in the Late Pleistocene of the Netherlands. Part I. Eemian and Early Weichselian: Med. v. d. Geol. Stichting, N. S.V., 14, p. 15–45.Google Scholar