Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-2pp2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T20:07:45.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Polyserial Correlations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Sik-Yum Lee  and
Wai-Yin Poon
Sik-Yum Lee*
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Wai-Yin Poon
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Sik-Yum Lee, Department of Statistics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N. T., HONG KONG.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers a multivariate normal model with one of the component variables observable only in polytomous form. The maximum likelihood approach is used for estimation of the parameters in the model. The Newton-Raphson algorithm is implemented to obtain the solution of the problem. Examples based on real and simulated data are reported.

Keywords

polytomous variablepolyserial correlationthresholdsmaximum likelihoodNewton-Raphson algorithmsimulation

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , March 1986 , pp. 113 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The research of the first author was supported in part by a research grant (DA01070) from the US Public Health Service. We are indebted to the referees and the editor for some very valuable comments and suggestions.

References

Ashford, J. R., Sowden, R. R. (1970). Multivariate probit analysis. Biometrics, 26, 535–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bard, Y. (1975). Nonlinear parameter estimation, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cox, N. R. (1974). Estimation of the correlation between a continuous and a discrete variable. Biometrids, 30, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1971). Probit analysis 3rd ed.,, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hannan, J. F., Tate, R. F. (1965). Estimation of the parameters for a multivariate normal distribution when one variable is dichotomized. Biometrika, 52, 664–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraemer, H. C. (1981). Modified biserial correlation coefficients. Psychometrika, 46, 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1959). Latent structure analysis. In Kock, S. (Eds.), Psychology: A study of science (Vol. 3), New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Nerlove, M., Press, S. J. (1973). Univariate and multivariate log-linear and logistic models (R: 1306-EDA/N1H), Santa Monica: The Rand Corp.Google Scholar
Olsson, U., Drasgow, F., Dorans, N. J. (1982). The polyserial correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 47, 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, J. W. (1981). Concavity of the loglikelihood. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 103–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, B. M., Tate, R. F. (1966). Accuracy of maximum-likelihood estimates of correlation for a biserial model. Psychometrika, 31, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, C. R. (1973) Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications. John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, P., Strauss, R. P. (1975). Estimation of models with jointly dependent qualitative variables: A simultaneous logit approach. Econometrica, 43, 745–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, R. F. (1955). The theory of correlation between two continuous variable when one is dichotomized. Biometrika, 42, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, R. F. (1955). Applications of correlation models for biserial data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 1078–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar