Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wxk4p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T07:23:56.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing One-Step M-Estimators of Location Corresponding to Two Independent Groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Rand R. Wilcox
Rand R. Wilcox*
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Rand R. Wilcox, Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. CA 90089-1061.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experience with real data indicates that psychometric measures often have heavy-tailed distributions. This is known to be a serious problem when comparing the means of two independent groups because heavy-tailed distributions can have a serious effect on power. Another problem that is common in some areas is outliers. This paper suggests an approach to these problems based on the one-step M-estimator of location. Simulations indicate that the new procedure provides very good control over the probability of a Type I error even when distributions are skewed, have different shapes, and the variances are unequal. Moreover, the new procedure has considerably more power than Welch's method when distributions have heavy tails, and it compares well to Yuen's method for comparing trimmed means. Wilcox's median procedure has about the same power as the proposed procedure, but Wilcox's method is based on a statistic that has a finite sample breakdown point of only 1/n, where n is the sample size. Comments on other methods for comparing groups are also included.

Keywords

Huber's Ψ functionL-statisticstrimmingmediansbootstrapMann-Whitney test

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 141 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brown, B. M. (1982). Robustness against inequality of variances. Australian Journal of Statistics, 24, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cressie, N. A. C., Whitford, A. B. (1986). How to use the two sample t-test. Biometrical Journal, 28, 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, E. (1988). Salience of the self and the salience of a standard: Attempts to match self to a standard. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
DiCiccio, T. J., Romano, J. P. (1988). A review of bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 50, 338–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donoho, D. L., Huber, P. J. (1988). The notion of breakdown point. In Bickel, P. J., Doksum, K. A., Hodges, J. L. Jr. (Eds.), A Festschrift for Erich Lehmann (pp. 157–184). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Efron, B. (1982). The Jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling methods, Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar
Efron, B. (1987). Better bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. (1986). On the number of bootstrap simulations required to construct a confidence interval. Annals of Statistics, 14, 1453–1462.Google Scholar
Hall, P. (1988). On symmetric bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 50, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, F. R., Ronchetti, E. M., Rousseeuw, P. J., Stahel, W. A. (1986). Robust statistics, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Harrell, F. E., Davis, C. E. (1982). A new distribution-free quantile estimator. Biometrika, 69, 635–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, X., Simpson, D. G., Portnoy, S. L. (1990). Breakdown robustness of tests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 446–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, P. (1964). Robust estimation of a location parameter. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35, 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, P. (1970). Studentizing robust estimates. In Puri, M. L. (Eds.), Nonparametric techniques in statistical inference (pp. 453–463). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, P. (1981). Robust statistics, New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafadar, K. (1982). Using biweight M-estimates in the two-sample problem Part 1: Symmetric populations. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 11, 1883–1901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, M. G., Stuart, A. (1973). The advanced theory of statistics, Vol. 2, New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Markatou, M., Hettmansperger, T. P. (1990). Robust bounded-influence tests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 187–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrish, R. S. (1990). Comparison of quantile estimators in normal sampling. Biometrics, 46, 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, K. R., Mudholkar, S., Fernando, J. L. I. (1988). Student's t approximations for three simple robust estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1203–1210.Google Scholar
Ramberg, J. S., Tadikamalla, P. R., Dudewicz, E. J., Mykytka, E. F. (1979). A probability distribution and its uses in fitting data. Technometrics, 21, 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawilowsky, S. S., Blair, R. C. (1990). A more realistic look at the robustness of the independent and dependent samples t tests to departure from population normality, Detroit: Wayne State University, College of Education.Google Scholar
Schrader, R. M., Hettmansperger, T. P. (1980). Robust analysis of variance. Biometrika, 67, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, P. K. (1982). On M tests in linear models. Biometrika, 69, 245–248.Google Scholar
Sheather, S. J., Marron, J. S. (1990). Kernel quantile estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 410–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, L. H., Hettmansperger, T. P. (1982). Robust estimates and tests for the one- and two-sample scale models. Biometrika, 69, 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorack, G. R. (1976). Robust studentization of location estimates. Statistical Neerlandica, 30, 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staudte, R. G., Sheather, S. J. (1990). Robust estimation and testing, New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, W. Y. (1982). Sampling distributions and robustness of t, F and variance-ratio in two samples and ANOVA models with respect to departure from normality. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 11, 2485–2511.Google Scholar
Tiku, M. L. (1982). Robust statistics for testing equality of means or variances. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 11, 2543–2558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tukey, J. W. (1960). A survey of sampling from contaminated distributions. In Olkin, I., Ghurye, S., Hoeffding, W., Madow, W., Mann, H. (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics (pp. 448–485). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Welch, B. (1937). The significance of the difference between two means when the population variances are unequal. Biometrika, 29, 350–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, R. R. (1987). New designs in analysis of variance. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 29–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, R. R. (1990). Comparing variances and means when distributions have non-identical shapes. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 19, 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, R. R. (1990). Comparing the means of two independent groups. Biometrical Journal, 32, 771–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, R. R. (1990). Comparing biweight measures of location in the two-sample problem. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 19, 1231–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, R. R. (1991). Testing whether independent groups have identical medians. Psychometrika, 56, 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshizawa, C. N., Sen, P. K., Davis, C. E. (1985). Asymptotic equivalance of the Harrell-Davis median estimator and the sample median. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 14, 2129–2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuen, K. K. (1974). The two-sample trimmed t for unequal population variances. Biometrika, 61, 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarembra, S. K. (1962). A generalization of Wilcoxon's test. Monatshefte fur Mathematik, 66, 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar