Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-s6l46 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T08:53:58.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduced fusion systems over p-groups with abelian subgroup of index p: III

Part of: Representation theory of groups Structure and classification of infinite or finite groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2019

Bob Oliver  and
Albert Ruiz
Bob Oliver
Affiliation:
LAGA, Institut Galilée, Av. J-B Clément, 93430Villetaneuse, France (bobol@math.univ-paris13.fr)
Albert Ruiz
Affiliation:
Departament de Mathemàtiques, Edifici C, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain (albert@mat.uab.cat)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We finish the classification, begun in two earlier papers, of all simple fusion systems over finite nonabelian p-groups with an abelian subgroup of index p. In particular, this gives many new examples illustrating the enormous variety of exotic examples that can arise. In addition, we classify all simple fusion systems over infinite nonabelian discrete p-toral groups with an abelian subgroup of index p. In all of these cases (finite or infinite), we reduce the problem to one of listing all 𝔽pG-modules (for G finite) satisfying certain conditions: a problem which was solved in the earlier paper [15] using the classification of finite simple groups.

Keywords

finite groupsfusionfinite simple groupsmodular representationsSylow subgroups

MSC classification

Primary: 20D20: Sylow subgroups, Sylow properties, $pi$-groups, $pi$-structure
Secondary: 20C20: Modular representations and characters 20D05: Finite simple groups and their classification 20E45: Conjugacy classes

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 150 , Issue 3 , June 2020 , pp. 1187 - 1239
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1Aguadé, J.. Constructing modular classifying spaces. Israel J. Math. 66 (1989), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Alperin, J. L.. Local representation theory. Modular representations as an introduction to the local representation theory of finite groups. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 11 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Andersen, K. and Grodal, J.. The classification of 2-compact groups. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 22 (2009), 387–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Andersen, K., Grodal, J., Møller, J. and Viruel, A.. The classification of p-compact groups for p odd. Ann. Math. 167 (2008), 95–210.10.4007/annals.2008.167.95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Andersen, K., Oliver, B. and Ventura, J.. Reduced, tame, and exotic fusion systems. Proc. London Math. Soc. 105 (2012), 87–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Andersen, K., Oliver, B. and Ventura, J.. Fusion systems and amalgams. Math. Z. 274 (2013), 1119–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Aschbacher, M., Kessar, R. and Oliver, B.. Fusion systems in algebra and topology. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 391 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Benson, D. J.. Representations and cohomology. I. Basic representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 30 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
9Broto, C., Levi, R. and Oliver, B.. The homotopy theory of fusion systems. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (2003), 779–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Broto, C., Levi, R. and Oliver, B.. Discrete models for the p-local homotopy theory of compact Lie groups and p-compact groups. Geom. Topol. 11 (2007), 315–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Broto, C., Levi, R. and Oliver, B.. An algebraic model for finite loop spaces. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 14 (2014), 2915–2981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Clark, A. and Ewing, J.. The realization of polynomial algebras as cohomology rings. Pacific J. Math. 50 (1974), 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Conway, J. H., Curtis, R.T., Norton, S.P., Parker, R.A., Wilson, R.A. and Atlas of finite groups. Maximal subgroups and ordinary characters for simple groups. With computational assistance from J. G. Thackray (Eynsham: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
14Craven, D.. The theory of fusion systems. An algebraic approach. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 131 (Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Craven, D., Oliver, B. and Semeraro, J.. Reduced fusion systems over p-groups with abelian subgroup of index p: II. Adv. Math. 322 (2017), 201–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Dwyer, W. and Wilkerson, C.. Homotopy fixed-point methods for Lie groups and finite loop spaces. Ann. Math. 139 (1994), 395–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Goldstein, L.. Analytic number theory (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1971).Google Scholar
18González, A.. The structure of p-local compact groups of rank 1. Forum Math. 28 (2016), 219–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19González, A., Lozano, T. and Ruiz, A.. Some new examples of p-local compact groups. Publ. Mat., (to appear), arXiv:1512.00284v5 [math.AT].Google Scholar
20Gorenstein, D.. Finite groups (New York/London: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1968).Google Scholar
21Levi, R. and Oliver, B.. Construction of 2-local finite groups of a type studied by Solomon and Benson. Geometry & Topology 6 (2002), 917–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Møller, J.. N-determined 2-compact groups. I. Fund. Math. 195 (2007), 11–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Oliver, B.. Simple fusion systems over p-groups with abelian subgroup of index p: I. J. Algebra 398 (2014), 527–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Puig, L.. Frobenius categories. J. Algebra 303 (2006), 309–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Ruiz, A. and Viruel, A.. The classification of p-local finite groups over the extraspecial group of order p 3 and exponent p. Math. Z. 248 (2004), 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Shephard, G. and Todd, J.. Finite unitary reflection groups. Canadian J. Math. 6 (1954), 274–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar