Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-br6xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-15T01:03:59.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identifying Factors Influencing the Design of a Suitable Knowledge Base in Product Engineering Projects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

C. Kempf ,
F. Sanke ,
J. Heimicke ,
S. Rapp  and
A. Albers
C. Kempf*
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
F. Sanke
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
J. Heimicke
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
S. Rapp
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
A. Albers
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
*
christoph.kempf@kit.edu

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During product engineering, engineers draw on existing knowledge as a basis. This knowledge is applied in design processes either by adopting elements, alternating some attributes, or changing the solution principles. While concepts for design reuse exist, the proactive design of a suitable knowledge base is still a challenge. In this paper, we show influencing factors in engineering and their influence on the knowledge base. These factors are of the areas market, company, project, and team. Based on our results, we intent to develop a support for engineers to set up the knowledge base.

Keywords

knowledge managementdesign reusereference systemengineering designproduct development

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 733 - 742
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Ahmed, S., Wallace, K. M., & Blessing, L. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A. (2010). Five Hypotheses about Engineering Processes and their Consequences. Proceedings of the TMCE 2010, Ancona, I, April 12-16, 2010.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Bursac, N., & Rapp, S. (2017). PGE – Produktgenerationsentwicklung am Beispiel des Zweimassenschwungrads. Forschung im Ingenieurwesen, 81, 13–31. 10.1007/s10010-016-0210-0Google Scholar
Albers, A., Bursac, N., Urbanec, J., Lüdcke, R., & Rachenkova, G. (2014). Knowledge management in product generation development—An empirical study. 25th Symposium Design for X, DFX 2014, Bamberg; Germany, 1. October 2014 through 2. October 2014. Ed.: Krause, D., 13–24.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Bursac, N., & Wintergerst, E. (2015). Produktgenerationsentwicklung—Bedeutung und Herausforderungen aus einer entwicklungsmethodischen Perspektive. Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung (SSP): Stuttgart, 19. Juni 2015; Hrsg.: H. Binz, 1–10.Google Scholar
Albers, A.; Haug, F.; Heitger, N.; Arslan, M.; Rapp, S. & Bursac, N.: Produktgenerationsentwicklung - Praxisbedarf und Fallbeispiel in der auto-mobilen Produktentwicklung. In: J. Gausemeier (Hrsg.): Vorausschau und Technologieplanung. 12. Symposium für Vorausschau und Technologie-planung 2016a. Berlin. Paderborn, S. 227–242.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Rapp, S., Spadinger, M., Richter, T., Birk, C., Marthaler, F., Heimicke, J., Kurtz, V., & Wessels, H. (2019). The Reference System in the Model of PGE: Proposing a Generalized Description of Reference Products and their Interrelations. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Delft, The Netherlands, 5-8 August 2019, 1(1), 1693–1702. 10.1017/dsi.2019.175Google Scholar
Albers, A., Reiss, N., Bursac, N., & Richter, T. (2016b). IPeM – Integrated Product Engineering Model in Context of Product Generation Engineering. 26th CIRP Design Conference, 50, 100–105. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.168Google Scholar
Alblas, A., & Jayaram, J. (2015). Design resilience in the fuzzy front end (FFE) context: An empirical examination. International Journal of Production Research, 53(22), 6820–6838. Scopus. 10.1080/00207543.2014.899718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, D., Gao, J., Case, K., Harding, J., Young, B., Cochrane, S., & Dani, S. (2008). A framework to integrate design knowledge reuse and requirements management in engineering design. ICMR 2005: Third International Conference on Manufacturing Research, 24(4), 585–593. 10.1016/j.rcim.2007.07.010Google Scholar
Corso, M., Muffatto, M., & Verganti, R. (1999). Reusability and multi-product development policies: A comparison of approaches in the automotive, motorcycle and earthmoving machinery industries. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 15(2), 155–165. Scopus. 10.1016/S0736-5845(99)00010-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, A. (2007). Engineering Design Methods—Strategies for Product Design. Wiley.Google Scholar
Eckert, C. M., Clarkson, P. J., & Zanker, W. (2004). Change and customisation in complex engineering domains. Research in Engineering Design, 15, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, R., & Henrich, A. (2008). An integrated context model for the product development domain and its implications on design reuse. 761–768. Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84861479414&partnerID=40&md5=d6a3cdd0b4066c49013cade704b7d94cGoogle Scholar
Ettlie, J. E., & Kubarek, M. (2008). Design reuse in manufacturing and services. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(5), 457–472. Scopus. 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00314.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gero, J. S. (1990). Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design. AI Magazine, 11(4), 26–36.Google Scholar
Hatchuel, A., Masson, P. L., & Weil, B. (2004). C-K Theory in Practice: Lessons from Industrial Applications. DS 32: Proceedings of DESIGN 2004, 245–258.Google Scholar
Iyer, N., Jayanti, S., Lou, K., Kalyanaraman, Y., & Ramani, K. (2005). Three-dimensional shape searching: State-of-the-art review and future trends. Computer-Aided Design 2005, 37(5), 509–530. 10.1016/j.cad.2004.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerris, N., & Dowling, S. (2007, January 9). Apple Reinvents the Phone with iPhone. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2007/01/09Apple-Reinvents-the-Phone-with-iPhone/Google Scholar
Maher, M. L., & Garza, A. G. de, S. (1997). Case-Based Reasoning in Design. IEEE Expert, 12, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, F., Kubisch, J., Rapp, S., & Albers, A. (2021a). Characterizing Product Development Processes in Start-ups – an Empirical Study. ISPIM Conference Proceedings, The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), Berlin, Germany, 1–16. 10.5445/IR/1000137421Google Scholar
Pfaff, F., Rapp, S., & Albers, A. (2021b). Modelling and Visualizing Knowledge on the Reference System and Vibrations based on the Model of PGE – Product Generation Engineering for Decision Support. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 2167–2176. 10.1017/pds.2021.478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassanelli, C., Da Costa Fernandes, S., Rozenfeld, H., Mascarenhas, J., & Terzi, S. (2021). Enhancing knowledge management in the PSS detailed design: A case study in a food and bakery machinery company. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications. Scopus. 10.1177/1063293X21991806Google Scholar
Shahin, T. M. M., Andrews, P. T. J., & Sivaloganathan, S. (1999). A design reuse system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 213(6), 621–627. 10.1243/0954405991517065Google Scholar
Sivaloganathan, S., & Shahin, T. M. M. (1999). Design reuse: An overview. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 213(7), 641–654. 10.1243/0954405991517092Google Scholar
VDI. (2004). VDI-Richtlinie 2206: Entwicklungsmethodik für mechatronische Systeme. Beuth Verlag.Google Scholar
VDI. (2019a). VDI-Richtlinie 2221 Blatt 1: Entwicklung technischer Produkte und Systeme—Modell der Produktentwicklung. Beuth Verlag.Google Scholar
VDI. (2019b). VDI-Richtlinie 2221 Blatt 2: Entwicklung technischer Produkte und Systeme—Gestaltung individueller Produktentwicklungsprozesse. Beuth Verlag.Google Scholar
Vezzetti, E., Moos, S., & Kretli, S. (2011). A product lifecycle management methodology for supporting knowledge reuse in the consumer packaged goods domain. Computer-Aided Design, 43(12), 1902–1911. 10.1016/j.cad.2011.06.025Google Scholar
Wouters, M. J. F., & Kerssens-Van Drongelen, I. C. (2004). Improving cross-functional communication about product architecture. 2, 561–565. Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-17644408091&partnerID=40&md5=72701a3e4253338070733317a1452df0Google Scholar
Wyatt, D. F., Eckert, C. M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2009). Design of product architectures in incrementally developed complex products. 167–178. Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84859252956&partnerID=40&md5=bf8aaa661537ea4ab161f8b00f7e7dc4Google Scholar
Zhang, C., Zhou, G., Lu, Q., & Chang, F. (2017). Graph-based knowledge reuse for supporting knowledge-driven decision-making in new product development. International Journal of Production Research, 55(23), 7187–7203. Scopus. 10.1080/00207543.2017.1351643Google Scholar