Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-dk7s8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T07:00:08.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE BEHAVIOUR IN PRODUCT/SERVICE SYSTEMS - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Karoline Fogh Gustafsson ,
Sara Amdi Harild  and
Daniela C. A. Pigosso
Karoline Fogh Gustafsson
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark
Sara Amdi Harild
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark
Daniela C. A. Pigosso*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark
*
Pigosso, Daniela, Technical University of Denmark, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Denmark, danpi@dtu.dk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Product-service/systems (PSS) have been projected to be a potential solution to address overconsumption and to enable an enhanced sustainability performance. However, PSS do not always live up to their potential benefits, due to unintended changes in consumer behaviour. This study aims at investigating existing methods and tools to develop sustainable behaviour within PSS, alongside potential barriers and success factors. Based on a systematic literature review, a total of 46 methods to achieve sustainable behaviour were collected and analysed, and further discussed on the basis of the identified success factors and barriers.

Keywords

SustainabilityProduct-Service Systems (PSS)Circular economyDesign for Sustainable Behaviour

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 1033 - 1042
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Biolchini, J., Mian, P. G., Natali, A. C. C., & Travassos, G. H. (2005). Systematic Review in Software Engineering. 679(05).Google Scholar
Blomsma, F. et al. (2018) ‘Exploring Circular Strategy Combinations - towards Understanding the Role of PSS’, Procedia CIRP, 69, pp. 752–757. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briceno, T., & Stagl, S. (2006). The role of social processes for sustainable consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(17), 1541–1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catulli, M., Cook, M., & Potter, S. (2017). Product Service Systems Users and Harley Davidson Riders: The Importance of Consumer Identity in the Diffusion of Sustainable Consumption Solutions. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(5), 1370–1379. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlin, L., & Boks, C. (2018). Marketing approaches for a circular economy: Using design frameworks to interpret online communications. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062070Google Scholar
Cheng, Y.-T., Shih, L.-H., & Ha, J. (2014). Design framework of household appliance for users’ sustainable behaviors. Anthropologist, 17(3), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2014.11891484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chunmao, W. U. and Lei, C. (2020) ‘Types and Models of Product-Service System in Design Agencies’, Journal of Donghua University, 37(5). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chunmao-Wu/publication/347935184_Types_and_M_odels_of_Product-Service_System_in_Design_Agencies/links/5fe88ac2a6fdccdcb807eec1/Types-and-M-odels-of-Product-Service-System-in-Design-Agencies.pdf (Accessed: 20 March 2021).Google Scholar
Daae, J. Z., & Boks, C. (2014). Dimensions of behaviour change. Journal of Design Research, 12(3), 145–172. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2014.064229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Medeiros, J. F., Da Rocha, C. G., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2018). Design for sustainable behavior (DfSB): Analysis of existing frameworks of behavior change strategies, experts’ assessment and proposal for a decision support diagram. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 402–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieroni, De Pádua, et al, M.. (2018) ‘Enabling circular strategies with different types of product/service-systems’, Procedia CIRP, 73, pp. 179–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council, Design. (2019). Double Diamond. Retrieved August 25, 2020, from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/Double Diamond Model 2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, S. da, C. et al. (2020) ‘Towards product-service system oriented to circular economy: A systematic review of value proposition design approaches’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 257, p. 120507. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulden, T., Moestue, C., & Berg, A. (2010). Psychology based design approach (PSYDA) - A pedagogical concept. In DS 62: Proceedings of E and PDE 2010, the 12th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education - When Design Education and Design Research Meet (pp. 376–381).Google Scholar
Kjaer, L. L. et al. (2019) ‘Product/Service-Systems for a Circular Economy: The Route to Decoupling Economic Growth from Resource Consumption?’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), pp. 22–35. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidman, K., & Renström, S. (2011). Design strategies in DfSB. Retrieved August 25, 2020, from https://sustainabilityguide.eu/methods/design-sustainable-behaviour/Google Scholar
Liedtke, C., Baedeker, C., Hasselkuß, M., Rohn, H., & Grinewitschus, V. (2015). User-integrated innovation in Sustainable LivingLabs: An experimental infrastructure for researching and developing sustainable product service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilley, D. (2009). Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions. Design Studies, 30(6), 704–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindholdt, D. V. (2019). Tyske myndigheder slår fast: El-løbehjul er slet ikke så grønne endda. Retrieved August 13, 2020, from https://www.berlingske.dk/virksomheder/tyske-myndigheder-slaar-fast-el-loebehjul-er-slet-ikke-saa-groenneGoogle Scholar
Lockton, D., Harrison, D., & Stanton, N. A. (2009). The Design with Intent Method: A design tool for influencing user behaviour. Applied Ergonomics, 41, 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.09.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manzini, E., & Vezzoli, C. A. (2002). Product-service systems and sustainability: Opportunities for sustainable solutions. UNEP-United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
McAloone, T. C. and Bey, N. (2009) Environmental improvement through product development: A guide. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Available at: http://www.kp.mek.dtu.dk/English/Research/areas/ecodesign/guide.aspx BT - Environmental improvement through product development.Google Scholar
Mont, O. (2004) ‘Institutionalisation of sustainable consumption patterns based on shared use’, Ecological Economics, 50(1-2), pp. 135–153. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pialot, O., Millet, D., & Bisiaux, J. (2017). “Upgradable PSS”: Clarifying a new concept of sustainable consumption/production based on upgradablility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 538–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigosso, D. and McAloone, T. (2015) ‘Supporting the Development of Environmentally Sustainable PSS by Means of the Ecodesign Maturity Model’, Procedia CIRP, 30, pp. 173–178. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozenfeld, H. et al. (2019) Servitization methodology: PSS design, change management or business model innovation?Google Scholar
Santamaria, L., Escobar-Tello, C., & Ross, T. (2016). Switch the channel: Using cultural codes for designing and positioning sustainable products and services for mainstream audiences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selvefors, A., & Renström, S. (2018). Design for Sustainable Behaviour. Retrieved August 24, 2020, from https://sustainabilityguide.eu/methods/design-sustainable-behaviour/Google Scholar
Shih, L. H., Huarng, F., & Jheng, Y.-C. (2017). Selecting persuasive strategies for design for energy-saving behavior. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Innovation: Applied System Innovation for Modern Technology, ICASI 2017 (pp. 1213–1216). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASI.2017.7988108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumter, D., Bakker, C., & Balkenende, R. (2018). The role of product design in creating circular business models: A case study on the lease and refurbishment of baby strollers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072415Google Scholar
Tromp, N., Hekkert, P., & Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience. Design Issues, 27(3), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wever, R., van Kuijk, J., & Boks, C. (2008). User-centred design for sustainable behaviour. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397030802166205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zachrisson, J., & Boks, C. (2010). When to apply different design for sustainable behaviour strategies? In Knowledge Collaboration & Learning for Sustainable Innovation ERSCP-EMSU conference, Delft. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1032.492&rep=rep1&type=pdfGoogle Scholar