Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T22:10:29.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterising the low-tech approach through a value-driven model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Alexandre Gaultier ,
Cédric Masclet  and
Jean-François Boujut
Alexandre Gaultier*
Affiliation:
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, G-SCOP, France
Cédric Masclet
Affiliation:
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, G-SCOP, France
Jean-François Boujut
Affiliation:
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, G-SCOP, France
*
alexandre.gaultier@grenoble-inp.fr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this article, we argue that the low-tech narrative redefined by a French low-tech movement in recent years can be considered as a legitimate research object for design research. Based on the French low-tech movement's literature, we present the definitions of the low-tech concept as an approach driven by principles and highlight two theorical limitations of this type of definition. Based on a value-sensitive design approach, we present transdisciplinary research results through a value-driven low-tech model and discussed its limitations and possible use as a tool for engineers.

Keywords

low-techphilosophy of technologyvalue sensitive designsustainabilityvalue-driven design

Information

Type
Industrial Design
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 2353 - 2362
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Béranger, A. (2022), “Médiatisation du phénomène low-tech”, presented at the Doctorales de la Société Française des Sciences de l'Information & de la Communication (SFSIC 2020.Google Scholar
Berlan, A. (2021), Terre et liberté. La quête d'autonomie contre le fantasme de délivrance - Aurélien Berlan, La lenteur.Google Scholar
Bernaud, W. (2021), Vers Une Démocratie Territoriale Low-tech, Mémoire de fin d’études MSc Strategy and Design for the Anthropocene Année 2020 - 2021, p. 81.Google Scholar
Bihouix, P., de Brosses, Baumes, Besse, E., Bonnifet, G., Darras, F., Désaunay, M., Gancille, T., et al, J.-M.. (2019), Vers des technologies sobres et résilientes - Pourquoi et comment développer l'innovation “low-tech” ?Google Scholar
Bihouix, P., (2020), The Age of Low Tech, 1st ed., Bristol University Press, https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv177tgng.Google Scholar
Bruyère, N., Geel, C. and Petit, V. (2023), Global Tools (1973-1975) - Eco-Design : Dé-projet & Low-Tech.Google Scholar
Carrey, J. and Lachaize, S. (2020), “La recherche scientifique en Low-Tech : définition, réflexions sur les pistes possibles, et illustration avec un projet de métallurgie solaire”, La Pensée écologique, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris cedex 14, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 7–7, https://dx.doi.org/10.3917/lpe.005.0007.Google Scholar
Colin, C. and Martin, A. (2023), “The user experience of low-techs: from user problems to design principles”, Vol. 18, pp. 68–85.Google Scholar
Decker, K.D. (2008), “About”, LOW←TECH MAGAZINE, available at: https://solar.low-techmagazine.com/about/ (accessed 17 November 2023).Google Scholar
Feenberg, A. and Feenberg, A. (2002), Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited, Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, C. (2020), “Pourquoi l'alternative low-tech tarde à se généraliser”, Usbek et RIca.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2008), “‘Low-Tech’ Innovations”, Industry and Innovation, Routledge, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 19–43, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13662710701850691.Google Scholar
Gorz, A. (2019), Éloge du suffisant, Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Illich, I. (1973), La Convivialité, Du seuil.Google Scholar
Kossoff, G. (2019), “Cosmopolitan Localism: The Planetary Networking of Everyday Life in Place”, Cuadernos Del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación, No. 73.Google Scholar
Martin, A., Gaultier, A. and Colin, C. (2022), “Cartographie du concept low-tech : guider la conception vers des techniques soutenables”, presented at the 56ème Congrès de la SELF, Vulnérabilités et risques émergents : penser et agir ensemble pour transformer durablement, p. 144.Google Scholar
Mateus, Q. and Roussilhe, G. (2023), Perspectives low-tech, Divergences.Google Scholar
Meyer, M. (2021), “Experimenting and documenting low tech”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Routledge, Vol. 33 No. 10, pp. 1147–1158, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1914834.Google Scholar
Mumford, L. (1963), Techniques Autoritaires et Démocratiques.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I. (2013), “Translating Values into Design Requirements”, in Michelfelder, D.P., McCarthy, N. and Goldberg, D.E. (Eds.), Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 253–266, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7762-0_20.Google Scholar
Raworth, K. (2014), A Safe and Just Space for Humanity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittel, H.W.J. and Webber, M.M. (1973), “Dilemmas in a general theory of planning”, Policy Sciences, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 155–169, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, E.F. (1973), Small Is Beautiful - Une Société à La Mesure de l'homme, Points.Google Scholar
Sclove, R. (1995), Democracy and Technology.Google Scholar
Varela, F.G., Maturana, H.R. and Uribe, R. (1974), “Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model”, Biosystems, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 187–196, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0303-2647(74)90031-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanguy, A., Carrière, L. and Laforest, V. (2023), “Low-tech approaches for sustainability: key principles from the literature and practice”, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 19 No. 1, p. 2170143, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2023.2170143.Google Scholar
Virenque, L. and Mossio, M. (2023), “What is Agency? A View from Autonomy Theory”, Biological Theory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press (MIT Press), https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13752-023-00441-5.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M.J. (n.d.). “Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Value (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Fall 2004 Edition)”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar