Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T18:47:36.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synthesis and characterization of (NH4)1.5Cu2Cr2O8(OH)1.5⋅H2O

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2012

Johana Arboleda ,
Adriana Echavarria  and
Luz Amparo Palacio
Johana Arboleda
Affiliation:
Grupo Catalizadores y Adsorbentes, Universidad de Antioquia, A.A. 1226 Medellin, Colombia
Adriana Echavarria
Affiliation:
Grupo Catalizadores y Adsorbentes, Universidad de Antioquia, A.A. 1226 Medellin, Colombia
Luz Amparo Palacio*
Affiliation:
Grupo Catalizadores y Adsorbentes, Universidad de Antioquia, A.A. 1226 Medellin, Colombia
*
b)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: luzamparopalacio@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new single-phase copper chromate compound was successfully synthesized by a hydrothermal method and characterized by XRD, SEM, TGA, and XRF analysis. The experimental XRD pattern was analyzed by automatic indexing and the compound was found to be monoclinic with space group P21/a and unit-cell parameters of a=10.1829(11) Å, b=4.9516(6) Å, c=7.2899(7) Å, and β=103.64(1)°. The chemical formula of the copper chromate compound determined by XRF and TGA was determined to be (NH4)1.5Cu2Cr2O8(OH)1.5⋅H2O. XRD results also showed that the synthesized compound decomposed into CuCr2O4 and CuO after being calcined at 600 °C.

Keywords

copper chromatehydrothermal synthesisTGAXRD

Information

Type
New Diffraction Data
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 244 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

El-Shobaky, G. A., El-Khouly, S. M., Ghozza, A. M., and Mohamed, G. M. (2006). “Surface and catalytic investigations of CuO–Cr2O3/Al2O3 system,” Appl. Catal. Gen. 302, 296–304. 10.1016/j.apcata.2006.01.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eranna, G., Joshi, B. C., Runthala, D. P., and Gupta, R. P. (2004). “Oxide materials for development of integrated gas sensors—A comprehensive review,” Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. CCRSDA 29, 111–188. 10.1080/10408430490888977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laugier, J. and Bochu, B. (2000). LMGP-Suite of Programs for the Interpretation of X-ray Experiments (ENSP/Laboratoire des Matériaux et du Génie Physique, Saint Martin d'Hères, France).Google Scholar
Li, W. and Cheng, H. (2008). “Bi2O3/CuCr2O4–CuO core/shell structured nanocomposites: Facile synthesis and catalysis characterization,” J. Alloys Compd. JALCEU 448, 287–292. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.10.081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, P. E., Erikson, L., and Westdahl, M. (1985). “TREOR, a semi-exhaustive trial and error powder indexing program for all symmetries,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 18, 367–370. 10.1107/S0021889885010512CrossRefGoogle Scholar