Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-stzjp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T07:36:40.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A neutron diffraction study on a typical highly defective ceria–yttria solid solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2012

Keka R. Chakraborty ,
S. V. Chavan  and
A. K. Tyagi
Keka R. Chakraborty
Affiliation:
Solid State Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, India
S. V. Chavan
Affiliation:
Applied Chemistry Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, India
A. K. Tyagi*
Affiliation:
Applied Chemistry Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, India
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; electronic mail: aktyagi@magnum.barc.ernet.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It was seen during the phase relation studies on the CeO2–YO1.5 system that the ceria is able to accommodate a large anion deficiency caused by aliovalent substitution. A neutron powder diffraction study has been carried out at room temperature for the titled solid solution, Ce1−xYxO2−x/2 with x=0.32, which is an anion-deficient variant of the ideal fluorite structure. The structure has been found to be face centered cubic. No superlattice reflections have been observed indicating that the vacancies occupy the random positions in this highly defective solid solution. The bond distances and angles are also being reported.

Information

Type
Technical Articles
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2002 , pp. 278 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chavan, S. V.and Tyagi, A. K. (2002). Thermochim. Acta THACAS 390, 79. tha, THACAS CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavan, S. V., Mathews, M. D., and Tyagi, A. K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (in press).Google Scholar
Denganello, J.and Martorana, R. (2002). J. Solid State Chem. JSSCBI 163, 527. jss, JSSCBI CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maki, Y., Matsuda, M., and Kudo, T. (1971). US Patent 3,607,424.Google Scholar
Paranjpe, S. K.and Dande, Y. (1989). Pramana J. Phys. PRAMCI 32, 793. prn, PRAMCI CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Carvajal, J. (1992). Physica B PHYBE3 192, 55. phb, PHYBE3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanherle, J., Horita, T., Kawada, T., Sakai, N., Yokokawa, H., and Dokiya, M. (1996). Solid State Ionics SSIOD3 86–88, 1255. ssi, SSIOD3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withers, R., Wallenberg, R., Bevan, D. J. M., Thompson, J. G., and Hyde, B. G. (1989). J. Less-Common Met. JCOMAH 156, 17. jco, JCOMAH CrossRefGoogle Scholar