No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Why We Love Pictures (for the Wrong Reasons): A Lesson from the Picture of a Black Hole
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 August 2025
Abstract
In this paper, I first argue that similarity accounts of scientific pictures fail with more realistic cases of scientific pictures. My primary case study is the picture of a black hole, to which I apply an interpretation-based account of picture representation analogous to how models represent: a picture represents a designated target system iff, once interpreted, it exemplifies properties that are imputed to the target via a de-idealising function. Then, I argue that the justification of the inferences from mechanically produced pictures depends on their causal mechanisms of production, in contrast with the standard justificatory strategies employed for model inferences.
Information
- Type
- Contributed Paper
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Philosophy of Science Association
References
Abdullahi, Muhammad, Li, Xiaojing, Abdallah, Mohamed Abou-Elwafa, Stubbings, William, Yan, Norman, Barnard, Marianne, Guo, Liang-Hong, Colbourne, John K., and Orsini, Luisa. 2022. “
Daphnia as a Sentinel Species for Environmental Health Protection: A Perspective on Biomonitoring and Bioremediation of Chemical Pollution.” Environmental Science and Technology 56 (20):14237–48. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.est.2c01799.Google Scholar
Abuter, Roberto, et al. 2018. “Detection of the Gravitational Redshift in the Orbit of the Star S2 near the Galactic Centre Massive Black Hole.” Astronomy and Astrophysics 615:L15. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833718.Google Scholar
Bouman, Katherine L. 2020. “The Inside Story of the First Picture of a Black Hole.” IEEE Spectrum. Available at: https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-inside-story-of-the-first-picture-of-a-black-hole.Google Scholar
Curiel, Erik. 2019. “The Many Definitions of a Black Hole.” Nature Astronomy 3 (1):27–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0602-1.Google Scholar
Da Costa, Newton C. A., and French, Steven. 1990. “The Model-Theoretic Approach to the Philosophy of Science.” Philosophy of Science 57 (2):248–65. https://doi.org/10.1086/289546.Google Scholar
Da Costa, Newton C. A., and French, Steven. 2000. “Models, Theories, and Structures: Thirty Years On.” Philosophy of Science 67 (S3):S116–27. https://doi.org/10.1086/392813.Google Scholar
Doboszewski, Juliusz, and Elder, Jamee. 2024. “Robustness and the Event Horizon Telescope: The Case of the First Image of M87.” Preprint, arXiv:2401.16323. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.16323.Google Scholar
Doboszewski, Juliusz, and Lehmkuhl, Dennis. 2023. “On the Epistemology of Observational Black Hole Astrophysics.” In Philosophy of Astrophysics: Stars, Simulations, and the Struggle to Determine What Is Out There, edited by Mills Boyd, Nora, Baerdemaeker, Siska De, Heng, Kevin, and Matarese, Vera, 225–47. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Eckart, Andreas, and Genzel, Reinhard. 1997. “Stellar Proper Motions in the Central 0.1 pc of the Galaxy.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 284 (3):576–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/284.3.576.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert. 1915. Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation. Sitzungsberichte der königlich preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin.Google Scholar
Elgin, Catherine Z. 1983. With Reference to Reference. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Elgin, Catherine Z. 1996. Considered Judgement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration. 2019a. “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole.” The Astrophysical Journal Letters 875 (1):L1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.11238.Google Scholar
Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration. 2019b. “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation.” The Astrophysical Journal Letters 875 (1):L2. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.11239.Google Scholar
Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration. 2019c. “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration.” The Astrophysical Journal Letters 875 (1):L3. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.11240.Google Scholar
Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration. 2019d. “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole.” The Astrophysical Journal Letters 875 (1):L4. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.11241.Google Scholar
Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration. 2019e. “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring.” The Astrophysical Journal Letters 875 (1):L5. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0f43.Google Scholar
Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration. 2019f. “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole.” The Astrophysical Journal Letters 875 (1):L6. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.09484.Google Scholar
Frigg, Roman, and Nguyen, James. 2020. Modelling Nature: An Opinionated Introduction to Scientific Representation. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, Karl, Adams, Joshua, Richstone, Douglas, Lauer, Tod R., Faber, S. M., Gültekin, Kayhan, Murphy, Jeremy, and Tremaine, Scott. 2011. “The Black Hole Mass in M87 from Gemini/NIFS Adaptive Optics Observations.” The Astrophysical Journal 729 (2):119. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/729/2/119.Google Scholar
Ghez, Andrea M., Klein, Beth L., Morris, Mark, and Becklin, Eric E.. 1998. “High Proper-Motion Stars in the Vicinity of Sagittarius A*: Evidence for a Supermassive Black Hole at the Center of Our Galaxy.” The Astrophysical Journal 509 (2):678–86. https://doi.org/10.1086/306528.Google Scholar
Giddings, Steven B. 2017. “Astronomical Tests for Quantum Black Hole Structure.” Nature Astronomy 1:0067. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0067.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald N. 2004. “How Models Are Used to Represent Reality.” Philosophy of Science 71 (5):742–52. https://doi.org/10.1086/425063.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald N. 2010. “An Agent-Based Conception of Models and Scientific Representation.” Synthese 172 (269):269–81.Google Scholar
Harms, Richard J., Ford, Holland C., Tsvetanov, Zlatan, Hartig, George F., Dressel, Linda L., Kriss, Gerard A., Bohlin, Ralph, Davidsen, Arthur F., Margon, Bruce, and Kochhar, Ajay K.. 1994. “HST FOS Spectroscopy of M87: Evidence for a Disk of Ionized Gas Around a Massive Black Hole.” Astrophysical Journal Letters, 435 (1):L35–8. https://doi.org/10.1086/187588.Google Scholar
Harris, Margherita. 2021. “Conceptualizing Uncertainty: The IPCC, Model Robustness and the Weight of Evidence.” Ph.D. diss., London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.00004355.Google Scholar
Hawking, Stephen W. 1976. “Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse.” Physical Review D 14:2460–73. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.14.2460.Google Scholar
Holsopple, Jessica M., Smoot, Shannon R., Popodi, Ellen M., Colbourne, John K., Shaw, Joseph R., Oliver, Brian, Kaufman, Thomas C., and Tennessen, Jason M.. 2023. “Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster
.” JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments) 193:e65029. https://doi.org/10.3791/65029.Google Scholar
Hyman, John. 2006. The Objective Eye: Color, Form, and Reality in the Theory of Art. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, John. 2012. “Depiction.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 71:129–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246112000276.Google Scholar
Isaac, Alistair. 2019. “The Allegory of Isomorphism.” Pismo Awangardy Filozoficzno-Naukowej 2: 1–23.Google Scholar
Kormendy, John, and Richstone, Douglas. 1995. “Inward Bound: The Search for Supermassive Black Holes in Galactic Nuclei.” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 33:581–624. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.33.090195.003053.Google Scholar
Lynden-Bell, Donald. 1969. “Galactic Nuclei as Collapsed Old Quasars.” Nature 223:690–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/223690a0.Google Scholar
Mastrandrea, Michael D., Field, Christopher B., Stocker, Thomas F., Edenhofer, Ottmar, Ebi, Kristie L., Frame, David J., Held, Hermann, Kriegler, Elmar, Mach, Katharine J., Matschoss, Patrick R., Plattner, Gian-Kasper, Yohe, Gary W., and Zwiers, Francis W.. 2010. “Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties.” Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
Meynell, Letitia. 2013. “Parsing Pictures: On Analyzing the Content of Images in Science.” The Knowledge Engineering Review 28 (3):327–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888913000271.Google Scholar
Miyoshi, Makoto, Moran, James, Herrnstein, James, Greenhill, Lincoln, Nakai, Naomasa, Diamond, Philip, and Inoue, Makoto. 1995. “Evidence for a Black Hole from High Rotation Velocities in a Sub-Parsec Region of NGC4258.” Nature 373 (6510):127–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/373127a0.Google Scholar
Muhr, Paula. 2023. “The ‘Cartographic Impulse’ and Its Epistemic Gains in the Process of Iteratively Mapping M87’s Black Hole.” Media & Environment 5 (1):341–57. https://doi.org/10.1525/001c.88163.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher. 1987. “Depiction.” The Philosophical Review 96 (3):383–410. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185226.Google Scholar
Penrose, Roger. 1965. “Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Singularities.” Physical Review Letters 14: 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.57.Google Scholar
Perini, Laura. 2005. “The Truth in Pictures.” Philosophy of Science 72 (1):262–85. https://doi.org/10.1086/426852.Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina L. 2008. “Neuroimaging and Inferential Distance.” Neuroethics 1:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-007-9003-3.Google Scholar
Sartori, Lorenzo. 2023a. “Model Organisms as Scientific Representations.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1086/728259.Google Scholar
Sartori, Lorenzo. 2023b. “Putting the ‘Experiment’ Back into the ‘Thought Experiment’.” Synthese 201 (34):1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-04011-3.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Karl. 1916. “Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie.” Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin):189–96.
Google Scholar
Skulberg, Emilie. 2021. “The Event Horizon as a Vanishing Point: A History of the First Image of a Black Hole Shadow from Observation.” Ph.D. diss., University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.73822.Google Scholar
Swoyer, Chris. 1991. “Structural Representation and Surrogative Reasoning.” Synthese 87:449–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00499820.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. Richard, Moran, James M., and Swenson, George W. Jr. 2017. Interferometry and Synthesis in Radio Astronomy. New York: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward. 1997. Visual and Statistical Thinking: Displays of Evidence for Decision Making. Cheshire, CT: Graphic Press.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas. 2008. Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, Jonelle L., Barth, Aaron J., Ho, Luis C., and Sarzi, Marc. 2013. “The M87 Black Hole Mass from Gas-Dynamical Models of Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph Observations.” The Astrophysical Journal 770 (2):86. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/86.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Michael. 2013. Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Willats, John. 1997. Art and Representation: New Principles in the Analysis of Pictures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar