Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-42qgm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T08:52:44.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surprised by a Nanowire: Simulation, Control, and Understanding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Johannes Lenhard
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper starts by looking at the coincidence of surprising behavior on the nanolevel in both matter and simulation. It uses this coincidence to argue that the simulation approach opens up a pragmatic mode of understanding oriented toward design rules and based on a new instrumental access to complex models. Calculations, and their variation by means of explorative numerical experimentation and visualization, can give a feeling for a model's behavior and the ability to control phenomena, even if the model itself remains epistemically opaque. Thus, the investigation of simulation in nanoscience provides a good example of how science is adapting to a new instrument: computer simulation.

Information

Type
Simulation, Instrumentation, and Representation at the Nanoscale
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 73 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2004 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers. Edited by Miriam Solomon , December 2006 , pp. 605 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

‡

I would like to thank Alfred Nordmann, Martin Carrier, and the contributors to the discussions at PSA 2004 for useful comments and suggestions.

References

de Regt, Henk W., and Dieks, Dennis (2005), “A Contextual Approach to Scientific Understanding,” Synthese 144(1): 137–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DOE (Department of Energy) (2002), “Theory and Modeling in Nanoscience,” Report of the May 10–11 workshop conducted by the Basic Energy Sciences and Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committees to the Office of Science, Department of Energy (http://www.cs.odu.edu/~keyes/scales/reports/nano_2002.pdf).Google Scholar
Feynman Richard P. (1960), “There Is Plenty of Room at the Bottom,” Engineering and Science, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Feynman, Richard P., Leighton, Robert B., and Sands, Matthew (1965), The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Fox Keller, Evelyn (2003), “Models, Simulation, and ‘Computer Experiments,’” in Radder, Hans (ed.), The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 198–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Paul (1991), “Computer Simulations,” in Fine, Arthur, Forbes, Micky, and Wessels, Linda (eds.), PSA 1990: Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 497–506.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Paul (2004). Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Paul (2006), “Self-Assembling Systems,” Philosophy of Science 73(5), in this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, and Salmon, Wesley C., eds. (1989), Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Landman, Uzi (2001), “Lubricating Nanoscale Machines: Unusual Behavior of Highly Confined Fluids Challenges Conventional Expectations,” Georgia Tech Research News, February 15 (http://gtresearchnews.gatech.edu/newsrelease/landman/landman_news.htm).Google Scholar
Landman, Uzi (2002), “Studies of Nanoscale Friction and Lubrication,” Georgia Tech Research News, October 22 (http://gtresearchnews.gatech.edu/newsrelease/MRSMEDAL.htm).Google Scholar
Landman, Uzi., et al. (1990), “Atomistic Mechanisms and Dynamics of Adhesion, Nanoindentation, and Fracture,” Science 248:454–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenhard, Johannes (2004), “Nanoscience and the Janus-Faced Character of Simulations,” in Baird, Davis, Nordmann, Alfred, and Schummer, Joachim (eds.), Discovering the Nanoscale. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 93–100.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary (2003), “Experiments without Material Intervention: Model Experiments, Virtual Experiments, and Virtually Experiments,” in Radder, Hans (ed.), The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 216–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrlich, Fritz (1991), “Computer Simulation in the Physical Sciences,” in Fine, Arthur, Forbes, Micky, and Wessels, Linda (eds.), PSA 1990: Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 507–518.Google Scholar
Roukes, Michael (2001), “Plenty of Room, Indeed,” Scientific American 285(3): 42–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winsberg, Eric (2003), “Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a Virtual World,” Philosophy of Science 70:105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsberg, Eric (2006), “Handshaking Your Way to the Top: Simulation at the Nanoscale,” Philosophy of Science 73(5), in this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar