Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-p4db6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T02:26:40.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Resolution of Bertrand's Paradox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Louis Marinoff
Louis Marinoff*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy University of British Columbia
*
‡Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia, 1866 Main Mall E-370, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z1, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bertrand's random-chord paradox purports to illustrate the inconsistency of the principle of indifference when applied to problems in which the number of possible cases is infinite. This paper shows that Bertrand's original problem is vaguely posed, but demonstrates that clearly stated variations lead to different, but theoretically and empirically self-consistent solutions. The resolution of the paradox lies in appreciating how different geometric entities, represented by uniformly distributed random variables, give rise to respectively different nonuniform distributions of random chords, and hence to different probabilities. The principle of indifference appears consistently applicable to infinite sets provided that problems can be formulated unambiguously.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

I would like to express my gratitude to Bill Boos, Roy Douglas, Dorothy Edgington, J. Howard Sobel, and the referee for Philosophy of Science for their insightful commentaries. This paper was originally read in March 1992, at a Colloquium in the Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia.

References

Bertrand, J. (1889), Calcul des Probabilités. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Borei, E. (1909), Éléments de la Théorie des Probabilités. Paris: Hermann et Fils.Google Scholar
Bulsenko, N.; Golenko, D.; Shreider, Y.; Sobol, I.; and Sragovich, V. (1966), The Monte Carlo Method: The Method of Statistical Trials, s. v. G. Tee: London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Cajori, F. (1913), A History of Probability. London: MacMillan & Co.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. ([1950] 1962), Logical Foundations of Probability. 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crofton, M. (1875), “Probability”, Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 19. 9th ed. Edinburgh: Adam & Charles Black.Google Scholar
Gnedenko, B. V. (1962), The Theory of Probability. New York: Chelsea.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1975), The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaynes, E. T. (1973), “The Well-Posed Problem”, Foundations of Physics 3: 477–492.10.1007/BF00709116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, H. ([1948] 1961), Theory of Probability. 3d ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. and Moran, P. (1963), Geometrical Probability. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. (1921), A Treatise on Probability. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Laplace, P. S. Marquis de ([1820] 1886), Théorie Analytique des Probabilités. 3d ed. Reprint. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Lucas, J. (1970), The Concept of Probability. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Marinoff, L. (1993), “Three Pseudo-Paradoxes in ‘Quantum’ Decision Theory: Apparent Effects of Observation on Probability and Utility”, Theory and Decision 35: 55–73.10.1007/BF01075235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northrop, E. (1944), Riddles in Mathematics: A Book of Paradoxes. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1912), Calcul des Probabilités. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Rozanov, Y. A. (1969), Introductory Probability Theory. Translated and edited by R. A. Silverman. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Uspensky, J. (1937), Introduction to Mathematical Probability. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B. (1989), Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198248601.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Mises, R. (1964), Mathematical Theory of Probability and Statistics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Weatherford, R. (1982), Philosophical Foundations of Probability Theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Weaver, W. (1963), Lady Luck: The Theory of Probability. Garden City: Doubleday-Anchor.Google Scholar