Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-54gsr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-15T01:02:53.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduction by Molecular Genetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

William K. Goosens
William K. Goosens*
Affiliation:
Lawrence University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Taking reduction in the traditional deductive sense, the programmatic claim that most of genetics can be reduced by molecular genetics is defended as feasible and significant. Arguments by Ruse and Hull that either the relationship is replacement or at best a weaker form of reduction are shown to rest on a mixture of historical and logical confusions about the nature of the theories involved.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , March 1978 , pp. 73 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] Hull, D. “Informal Aspects of Theory Reduction.” In Proceedings of the 1974 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Pp. 653–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Hull, D. Philosophy of Biological Science. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
[3] Hull, D. “Reduction in Genetics—Biology or Philosophy?” Philosophy of Science 39 (1972): 491–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Proceedings of the 1974 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Ed. R. Cohen, C. Hooker, A. Michalos, and J. van Eura. Dordrecht-Holland: D. Reidel, 1976.Google Scholar
[5] Ruse, M. The Philosophy of Biology. London: Hutchinson & Co., 1973.Google Scholar
[6] Ruse, M. “Reduction in Genetics.” In Proceedings of the 1974 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Pp. 633–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Ruse, M. “Reduction, Replacement, and Molecular Biology.” Dialectica 25 (1971): 39–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Schaffner, K. “The Peripherality of Reductionism in the Development of Molecular Biology.” Jounal of the History of Biology 7 (1974): 111–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[9] Schaffner, K. “Reduction in Biology: Prospects and Problems.” In Proceedings of the 1974 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Pp. 613–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Schaffner, K. “The Watson-Crick Model and Reductionism” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (1969): 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar