Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-rcs6z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T08:52:52.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Realism about Structure: The Semantic View and Nonlinguistic Representations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Steven French  and
Juha Saatsi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The central concern of this article is whether the semantic approach has the resources to appropriately capture the core tenets of structural realism. Chakravartty (2001) has argued that a realist notion of correspondence cannot be accommodated without introducing a linguistic component, which undermines the approach itself. We suggest that this worry can be addressed by an appropriate understanding of the role of language in this context. The real challenge, however, is how to incorporate the core notion of ‘explanatory approximate truth’ in such a way that the emphasis on structure is retained.

Information

Type
The Semantic View of Theories, Scientific Structuralism, and Structural Realism
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 73 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2004 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers. Edited by Miriam Solomon , December 2006 , pp. 548 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

‡

We have had discussions with many people about the issues considered here, but we would like to thank Angelo Cei in particular. Of course, any errors or confusions are entirely our responsibility. The research for this article was supported in part (for Juha Saatsi) by the Finnish Cultural Foundation.

References

Cei, Angelo, and French, Steven (2006), “Looking for Structure in All the Wrong Places,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A 37:637–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravartty, Anjan (2001), “The Semantic or Model-Theoretic View of Theories and Scientific Realism,” Synthese 127:325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, Pierre (2004), “Scientific Realism, Ramsey-Sentences and the Reference of Theoretical Terms,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18:133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, Pierre, and Papineau, David (2002), “Scientific Realism without Reference,” in Marsonet, M. (ed.), The Problem of Realism. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Da Costa, Newton C. A., and French, Steven (2003), Science and Partial Truth: A Unitary Approach to Models and Scientific Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demopoulos, William, and Friedman, Michael (1985), “Critical Notice: Bertrand Russell’s The Analysis of Matter: Its Historical Context and Contemporary Interest,” Philosophy of Science 52:621–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Steven (2003), “A Model-Theoretic Account of Representation (Or, I Don’t Know Much about Art … But I Know It Involves Isomorphism),” Philosophy of Science 70 (Proceedings): 1472–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Steven (2003), “Remodelling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics and the Metaphysics of Structure,” Synthese 136:31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, Robin (2001), “Mathematics, Representation and Molecular Structure,” in Klein, Ursula (ed.), Tools and Modes of Representation in the Laboratory Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 223–238.Google Scholar
Ketland, Jeff (2004), “Empirical Adequacy and Ramsification,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55:287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladyman, James (1998), “What Is Structural Realism?” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science A 29:409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladyman, James, and French, Steven (1999), “Reinflating the Model-Theoretic Approach,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13:99–117.Google Scholar
Melia, Joseph, and Saatsi, Juha (2006), “Ramseyfication and Theoretical Content,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57:561–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, M. H. A. (1928), “Mr. Russell’s Causal Theory of Perception,” Mind 37:137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, M. H. A. (1999), Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Newman, M. H. A. (2001), “Is Structural Realism Possible?” Philosophy of Science 68 (Proceedings): S13–S24.Google Scholar
Newman, M. H. A. (2006), “The Structure, the Whole Structure and Nothing but the Structure?” in Philosophy of Science (Proceedings), in this issue.Google Scholar
Saatsi, Juha (2006), “Reconsidering the Fresnel-Maxwell Theory Shift,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A 36:509–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppe, Fred (1998), “Theories, Scientific,” in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Suppes, Patrick (1967), “What Is a Scientific Theory?” in Morgenbesser, Sidney (ed.), Philosophy of Science Today. New York: Basic, 55–67.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas (1989), Laws and Symmetry. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas (1997), “Structure and Perspective: Philosophical Perplexity and Paradox,” in Chiara, Maria Dalla, Guintini, Roberto, and Laudisa, Federico (eds.), Logic and Scientific Method. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 511–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worrall, John (1989), “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?” Dialectica 43:99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar