Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-xh45t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-27T09:15:53.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ontology and Acquaintance: A Reply to Clatterbaugh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Edwin B. Allaire
Edwin B. Allaire*
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Consider a red circle, and suppose it is a paradigmatic thing. Some philosophers maintain that a thing is ontologically analyzable into a particular exemplifying properties, those properties truly ascribed to the thing by the customary words. Our red circle, then, consists of a particular, say a; two properties, red and circle; and exemplification, a tie tying a, red, and circle into “the red circle.” Upon this analysis, a is bare, i.e., not re-recognizable as such, whereas red and circle are natured, i.e., not bare, and, further, are universal, i.e., they may be exemplified by several particulars (or, somewhat differently, they may be in several things).

Information

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , July 1965 , pp. 277 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] Allaire, Edwin B., “Bare Particulars,” Philosophical Studies, 14 (1963), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Allaire, Edwin B., “Another Look at Bare Particulars,” Philosophical Studies, 16 (1965), 15–21.10.1007/BF00398838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Allaire, Edwin B., “The Attack on Substance: Descartes to Hume,” Dialogue, 3 (1964), 281–287.10.1017/S0012217300035423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Anscombe, G. E. M., An Introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Hutchinson, 1959.Google Scholar
[5] Austin, J. L., “Are There A priori Concepts?” Philosophical Papers (The Clarendon Press, 1961), 1–22.Google Scholar
[6] Bergmann, Gustav, “Synthetic A Priori,” Logic and Reality (The University of Wisconsin Press, 1964), 272–301.Google Scholar
[7] Bergmann, Gustav, “Some Reflections on Time,” Meaning and Existence (The University of Wisconsin Press, 1960), 225–263.Google Scholar
[8] Chappell, V. C., “Particulars Re-Clothed,” Philosophical Studies, 15 (1964), 60–64.10.1007/BF00457595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Clatterbaugh, Kenneth C., “General Ontology and the Principle of Acquaintance,” Philosophy of Science, Vol. 32, no. 3. (This issue).Google Scholar