Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-d7bbv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T07:39:39.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leplin on Essentialism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Dudley Shapere
Dudley Shapere*
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University and The Institute for Advanced Study
*
‡Send reprint requests to the author, Drawer 7229 Reynolda Station, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Jarrett Leplin has recently criticized a number of aspects of my views of the aims and goals of science, of the rationale of scientific change, and of the consequent relations between science and the philosophy of science, and in particular of the methodology of the latter (Leplin 1984, 1987, 1988a, 1988b). Here I will respond to those criticisms, and also reply to some related criticisms made by other writers.

Information

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 655 - 677
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

This paper was written during a visit at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ, an opportunity for which I am grateful.

References

Leplin, J. (1984), “Truth and Scientific Progress”, in J. Leplin (ed.), Scientific Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leplin, J. (1987), Review of Faraday to Einstein: Constructing Meaning in Scientific Theories, by N. Nersessian. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38: 575–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leplin, J. (1988a), “Is Essentialism Unscientific?” Philosophy of Science 55: 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leplin, J. (1988b), Review of Construction and Constraint: The Shaping of Scientific Reality, by E. McMullin, (ed.). Isis 79: 691–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marston, V. P. (1988), “Back to Reality?” Nature 332: 750.Google Scholar
McMullin, E. (ed.) (1988), Construction and Constraint: The Shaping of Scientific Rationality. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Niiniluoto, I. (1984), Is Science Progressive? Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, D. (1964), “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”, Philosophical Review 73: 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, D. (1966), “Meaning and Scientific Change”, in R. Colodny (ed.), Mind and Cosmos: Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 41–85.Google Scholar
Shapere, D. ([1968] 1974), “Scientific Theories and Their Domains”, in F. Suppe (ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 518–565.Google Scholar
Shapere, D. (1977), “What Can the Theory of Knowledge Learn from the History of Knowledge?” The Monist 60: 488–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, D. (1980), “The Character of Scientific Change”, in T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 61–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, D. (1982a), “The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy”, Philosophy of Science 49: 485–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, D. (1982b), “Reason, Reference, and the Quest for Knowledge”, Philosophy of Science 49: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, D. (1984), Reason and the Search for Knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Shapere, D. (1985), “Objectivity, Rationality, and Scientific Change”, in P. Kitcher and P. Asquith (eds.), PSA 1984, vol. 2. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 637–663.Google Scholar
Shapere, D. (1986), “External and Internal Factors in the Development of Science”, Science and Technology Studies 4: 1–9, 19–23.Google Scholar
Shapere, D. (1987), “Method in the Philosophy of Science and Epistemology”, in N. Nersessian (ed.), The Process of Science: Contemporary Philosophical Approaches to Understanding Scientific Practice. Dordrecht: Nijhoff, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Shapere, D. (1988a), “Doppelt Crossed”, Philosophy of Science 55: 134–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, D. (1988b), “Rationalism and Empiricism: A New Perspective”, Argumentation 2: 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, D. (1989a), “Evolution and Continuity in Scientific Change”, Philosophy of Science 56: 419–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, D. (1989b), “Modern Physics and the Philosophy of Science”, in A. Fine and J. Leplin (eds.), PSA 1988, vol. 1. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 201–210.Google Scholar
Shapere, D. (forthcoming), “On the Introduction of New Hypotheses in Science”, to appear in J. Leplin (ed.), Proceedings of Conference on Scientific Creativity, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Held March 1989.Google Scholar