Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-9h5t2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T01:16:21.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Epistemology of a Spectrometer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Daniel Rothbart  and
Suzanne W. Slayden
Daniel Rothbart*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies George Mason University
Suzanne W. Slayden*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry George Mason University
*
‡Send reprint requests to Daniel Rothbart, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, George Mason University, 4400 University Blvd., Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contrary to the assumptions of empiricist philosophies of science, the theory-laden character of data will not imply the inherent failure (subjectivity, circularity, or rationalization) of instruments to expose nature's secrets. The success of instruments is credited to scientists' capacity to create artificial technological analogs to familiar physical systems. The design of absorption spectrometers illustrates the point: Progress in designing many modern instruments is generated by analogically projecting theoretical insights from known physical systems to unknown terrain. An experimental realism is defended.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 25 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

We greatly appreciate comments on earlier drafts from Rom Harré, Mary Hesse, Emmett Holman, and especially an anonymous referee for this journal.

References

Ackermann, R. (1985), Data, Instruments, and Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400854936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bair, E. (1962), Introduction to Chemical Instrumentation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Baird, D. and Faust, T. (1990), “Scientific Instrument, Scientific Progress and the Cyclotron”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41: 147–175.10.1093/bjps/41.2.147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogen, J. and Woodward, J. (1988), “Saving the Phenomena”, The Philosophical Review 97: 303–352.10.2307/2185445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogen, J. and Woodward, , (1992), “Observations, Theories and the Evolution of the Human Spirit”, Philosophy of Science 59: 590–611.10.1086/289697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. (1981), Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, A. (1986), The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, P. (1987), How Experiments End. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galison, P. and Assmus, A. (1989), “Artificial Clouds and Real Particles”, in Gooding, D., Pinch, T. and Schaffer, S. (eds.), The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225–274.Google Scholar
Gooding, D. (1989), “Magnetic Curves and the Magnetic Field: Experimentation and Representation in the History of a Theory”, in Gooding, D., Pinch, T., and Schaffer, S. (eds.), The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 183–223.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1983), Representing and Intervening. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1988), “On the Stability of the Laboratory Sciences”, The Journal of Philosophy 85: 507–514.10.5840/jphil1988851016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, R. (1961), Theories and Things. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1986), Varieties of Realism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hesse, M. (1980), Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hesse, M. (1992), “Science Beyond Realism and Relativism”, in Raven, D., van Vucht Tijssen, L., and Wolf, J. de (eds.), Cognitive Relativism and Social Science. London: Transaction Publishers, pp. 91–106.Google Scholar
Hooker, C. A. (1987), “On Global Theories”, in A Realistic Theory of Science. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 109–138.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, C.; Vickers, T.; and Gulick, W. (1974), Instrumental Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Massey, J. (1967), “Information, Machines, and Men”, in Crosson, F. and Sayre, K. (eds.), Philosophy and Cybernetics. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 37–70.Google Scholar
Morrison, M. (1990), “Theory, Intervention and Realism”, Synthese 82: 1–22.10.1007/BF00413667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A. (1989), “Living in the Material World: On Realism and Experimental Practice”, in Gooding, D., Pinch, T., and Schaffer, S., (eds.), D. Gooding, T. Pinch, and S. Schaffer, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 275–297.Google Scholar
Radder, H. (1986), “Experiment, Technology and the Intrinsic Connection between Knowledge and Power”, Social Studies of Science 16: 663–683.10.1177/030631286016004005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radder, H. (1988), The Material Realization of Science. Assen, Holland: van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. (1992), “On Refusing to be an Epistemologically Black Box: Instruments in Chemical Kinetics in the 1920s and 30s”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23: 283–304.10.1016/0039-3681(92)90036-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1985), Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Strobel, H. and Heineman, W. (1989), Chemical Instrumentation: A Systematic Approach, 3d ed. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B. (1980), The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198244274.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, W. (1964), “Recent Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Communication”, in Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. (eds.), The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (1989), “Data and Phenomena”, Synthese 79: 393–472.10.1007/BF00869282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolgar, S. (1988), Science: The Very Idea. London: Ellis Horwood & Tavistock.Google Scholar