Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-7vqc4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T01:02:44.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergence, Not Supervenience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Paul Humphreys
Paul Humphreys*
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
*
†Corcoran Department of Philosophy, 521 Cabell Hall, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA. pwh2a@virginia.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue that supervenience is an inadequate device for representing relations between different levels of phenomena. I then provide six criteria that emergent phenomena seem to satisfy. Using examples drawn from macroscopic physics, I suggest that such emergent features may well be quite common in the physical realm.

Information

Type
Symposium: Emergence and Supervenience: Alternatives to Unity by Reduction
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 64 , Issue S4: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1996 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers Dec., 1997 , 1997 , pp. S337 - S345
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, P. W. (1972), “More is Different”, Science 177: 393–396.10.1126/science.177.4047.393CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, D. M. (1989), Universals: An Opinionated Introduction. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Humphreys, P. W. (1995), “Understanding in the Not-So-Special Sciences”, Southern Journal of Philosophy XXXIV, Supplement: Spindel Conference 1995: 99–114.Google Scholar
Humphreys, P. W. (1996), “Aspects of Emergence”, Philosophical Topics 24: 53–70.10.5840/philtopics19962413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, P. W. (1997), “How Properties Emerge”, Philosophy of Science 64: 1–17.10.1086/392533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. (1993), Supervenience and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511625220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. K. (1986), On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rohrlich, F. (1997), “Cognitive Emergence”, Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings): This issue.10.1086/392613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1997), “Can Physicalist Antireductionism Compute the Embryo?”, Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings): This issue.10.1086/392614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, G. L. (1986), Quantum Theory of Collective Phenomena. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Teller, P. (1992), “A Contemporary Look at Emergence”, in Beckermann, A., Flohr, H., and Kim, J. (eds.), Emergence or Reduction?, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 139–153.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. (1998), “Emergence as Non-Aggregativity and the Biases of Reductionisms”, in W. Wimsatt, Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar