Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-tbj44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T04:37:13.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Z scaling of collisional Ne-like X-ray lasers using exploding foils: Refraction effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

S. Jacquemot  and
A. Decoster
S. Jacquemot
Affiliation:
Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Centre d'Etudes de Limeil-Valenton, BP 27, F94195 Villeneuve-Saint-Georges Cedex, France
A. Decoster
Affiliation:
Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Centre d'Etudes de Limeil-Valenton, BP 27, F94195 Villeneuve-Saint-Georges Cedex, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Neonlike ions have long been recognized as candidates for producing soft-X-ray lasers along 1s22s22p53p → 1s22s22p53s transitions. A series of experiments using exploding-foil targets driven by high-power lasers was performed at CEL-V and LLNL, and demonstrated amplified spontaneous emission in germanium, selenium, strontium, and molybdenum. We present here simulations of these experiments and discuss the importance of refraction effects on the propagation of the lasing X-rays and on the scaling of this scheme to shorter wavelengths.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 517 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Berthier, E. et al. 1988 Rapport des activités laser CEA/CEL-V, p. 304.Google Scholar
Decoster, A. & Jacquemot, S. 1988 Rapport des activités laser CEA/CEL-V, p. 298.Google Scholar
Ferrer, J. L. 1988 CEL-V internal report.Google Scholar
Jacquemot, S. 1988 Rapport des activités laser CEA/CEL-V, p. 301.Google Scholar
Keane, C. J. et al. 1989 J. Phys. B 22, 3343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, C. J. et al. 1990 Phys. Rev. A 42, 2327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langdon, A. B. 1980 Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
London, R. A. 1986 LLNL Laser Program Annual Report, No. UCRL-50021–86, pp. 2–32.Google Scholar
Louis-Jacquet, M. et al. 1988 CEL-V internal report.Google Scholar
MacGowan, B. J. et al. 1987 J. Appl. Phys. 61, 5243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D. L. et al. 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naccache, D. et al. 1990 Phys. Rev. A 42, 3027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, M. D., London, R. A. & Hagelstein, P. L. 1988 Phys. Fluids 31, 666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skupsky, S. 1987 Phys. Rev. A 36, 5701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, E. E. 1968 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 8, 1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zherikhin, A. N., Koshelev, K. N. & Letokhov, V. S. 1976 Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 6, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar