Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-m9hx9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-19T02:45:52.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decentering the colonial native speaker

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Devin Grammon  and
Anna Babel
Devin Grammon*
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Anna Babel*
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
*
Grammon, 417 Friendly Hall, 1233 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97402, [grammon@uoregon.edu]
Babel, 298 Hagerty Hall, 1775 College Rd., Columbus, OH 43210, [babel.6@osu.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we advocate a SPEAKERHOOD STUDIES approach as part of an effort to decenter the ‘native speaker’ in linguistics. Recent critiques of native-speakerhood problematize this construct's links to essentializing discourses born of ethnolinguistic nationalism and colonialism and advocate for more specific and less reductionist approaches to describing speakers in linguistics (e.g. Babel & Grammon 2021, Birkeland et al. 2024, Cheng et al. 2021). We argue that it is important to consider—indeed, to center—conceptions of speakerhood in multilingual, transnational communities that offer a contrast to discourses centered on language purism, nationalism, and standard language ideologies. We examine data from speakers of Quechua, analyzing ways in which their ideologies of speakerhood diverge from naturalized scientific discourses in linguistics, in order to demonstrate the possibilities and the stakes of a speakerhood studies approach.

Keywords

native speakerspeakerhoodQuechuaPeruBolivia

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 100 , Issue 3 , September 2024 , pp. 504 - 551
Copyright
Copyright © 2024 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

The authors would like to acknowledge and thank Kevin McGowan, Elvia Andia Grágeda, Savithry Namboodiripad, Ethan Kutlu, members of the ROLE Collective, editor John Beavers, associate editor Lauren Hall-Lew, and the two anonymous referees for their feedback and encouragement in the process of writing and revising this article. We also thank the many people who made thoughtful contributions to this research in the roles of colleagues and/or consultants.

References

Acevedo Butcher, Carmen. 2005. The case against the ‘native speaker’. English Today 21. 13–24. DOI: 10.1017/S0266078405002038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15. 38–59. DOI: 10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2006. Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511618284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.) 2007. Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alighieri, Dante. 1996. De vulgari eloquentia. Ed. and trans. by Botterill, Steven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511519444.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. 2008. Real descriptions: Reflections on native speaker and non-native speaker descriptions of a language. Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing, ed. by Ameka, Felix K., Dench, Alan, and Evans, Nicholas, 69–112. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110197693.69.Google Scholar
Angelucci, Thalita Carmago, and Pozzo, María Isabel. 2021. Enseñanza de lenguas y el mito del hablante nativo [Language teaching and the myth of the native speaker]. Pro-Posições 32. DOI: 10.1590/1980-6248-2019-0031ES.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avineri, Netta, Johnson, Eric, Brice-Heath, Shirley, McCarty, Teresa, Ochs, Elinor, Kremer-Sadlik, Tamar, Blum, Susan, Zentella, Ana Celia, Rosa, Jonathan, Alim, H. Samy; and Paris, Django. 2015. Invited forum: Bridging the ‘language gap’. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 25. 66–86. DOI: 10.1111/jola.12071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babel, Anna M. 2014. Stereotypes versus experience: Indexing regional identity in Bolivian Valley Spanish. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18. 604–33. DOI: 10.1111/josl.12101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babel, Anna M. (ed.) 2016. Awareness and control in sociolinguistic research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139680448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babel, Anna M. 2018. Between the Andes and the Amazon: Language and social meaning in Bolivia. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Online: https://muse.jhu.edu/book/57466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babel, Anna M., and Grammon, Devin. 2021. What does ‘native speaker’ mean anyway? Language Log, May 29, 2021. Online: https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=51108.Google Scholar
Beaver, David. 2020. Sub-sentential speech acts. Colloquium presentation, The Ohio State University Department of Linguistics, October 16.Google Scholar
Beaver, David, and Stanley, Jason. 2023. The politics of language. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bereiter, Carl, and Engelmann, Siegfried. 1966. Teaching disadvantaged children in the preschool. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Besnier, Niko. 1990. Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology 19. 419–51. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.002223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkeland, Anne, Block, Adeli, Craft, Justin, Sedarous, Yourdanis, Wang, Sky, Wu, Alexis; and Namboodiripad, Savithry. 2024. Rejecting nativeness to produce a more accurate and just Linguistics. Language 100.e156–e194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Backus, Ad. 2013. Superdiverse repertoires and the individual. Multilingualism and multimodality: Current challenges for educational studies, ed. by de Saint-Georges, Ingrid and Weber, Jean-Jacques, 9–32. Leiden: Brill. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-266-2_2.Google Scholar
Bonfiglio, Thomas Paul. 2010. Mother tongues and nations: The invention of the native speaker. New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9781934078266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfiglio, Thomas Paul. 2013. Inventing the native speaker. Critical Multilingualism Studies 1. 29–58. Online: https://cms.arizona.edu/index.php/multilingual/article/view/29.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, Theo, Planken, Brigitte; and Schils, Erik. 1995. Can late learners attain a native accent in foreign language? A test of the critical period hypothesis. The age factor in second language acquisition, ed. by Singleton, David and Lengyel, Zsolt, 30–50. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, Theo, van Summeren, Chantal, Planken, Brigitte; and Schils, Erik. 1997. Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19. 447–65. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263197004026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511612886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bylin, Maria, and Tingsell, Sofia. 2022. The native speaker: A border marker of the standard, the nation, and variation. Current Issues in Language Planning 23. 254–74. DOI: 10.1080/14664208.2021.1965741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, A. Suresh. 1999. Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canessa, Andrew. 2008. The past is not another country: Exploring indigenous histories in Bolivia. History and Anthropology 19. 353–69. DOI: 10.1080/02757200802611654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rudolfo. 1980. El quechua: Una mirada de conjunto. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Centro de Investigación de Lingüística Aplicada.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rudolfo. 1987. Lingüística quechua. Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Rurales Andinos Bartolomé de Las Casas.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rudolfo. 2008. Quechumara: Estructuras paralelas del quechua y del Aimara. 2nd edn. La Paz: Plural.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rudolfo. 2010. Contactos y desplazamientos lingüísticos en los Andes centro-sureños: El puquina, el aimara y el quechua. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP 14. 255–82. DOI: 10.18800/boletindearqueologiapucp.201001.013.Google Scholar
Charity Hudley, Anne H., Mallinson, Christine; and Bucholtz, Mary. 2020. Toward racial justice in linguistics: Interdisciplinary insights into theorizing race in the discipline and diversifying the profession. Language 96.e200–e235. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2020.0074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charity Hudley, Anne H., Mallinson, Christine; and Bucholtz, Mary (eds.) 2024a. Decolonizing linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197755259.001.0001.Google Scholar
Charity Hudley, Anne H., Mallinson, Christine; and Bucholtz, Mary (eds.) 2024b. Inclusion in linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197755303.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen Pichler, Deborah, and Koulidobrova, Elena. 2023. The role of modality in L2 learning: The importance of learners acquiring a second sign language (M2L2 and M1L2 learners). Language Learning 73. 197–233. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lauretta S. P., Burgess, Danielle, Vernooij, Natasha, Solís-Barroso, Cecilia, McDermott;, Ashley and Namboodiripad, Savithry. 2021. The problematic concept of native speaker in psycholinguistics: Replacing vague and harmful terminology with inclusive and accurate measures. Frontiers in Psychology 12:715843. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W., Beddor, Patrice Speeter, Shedden, Kerby, Styler, Will; and Wissing, Daan. 2018. Plosive voicing in Afrikaans: Differential cue weighting and tonogenesis. Journal of Phonetics 66. 185–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2017.09.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W., and Pater, Joe. 2011. The place of variation in phonological theory. The handbook of phonological theory, ed. by Goldsmith, John, Yu, Alan C. L., and Riggle, Jason, 401–34. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781444343069.ch13.Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian. 1999. Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 33. 185–209. DOI: 10.2307/3587717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coronel-Molina, Serafín M. 2008. Language ideologies of the High Academy of the Quechua Language in Cuzco, Peru. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 3. 319–40. DOI: 10.1080/17442220802462477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coronel-Molina, Serafín M. 2015. Language ideology, policy and planning in Peru. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI: 10.21832/9781783094257.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian (ed.) 1981. A festschrift for native speaker. The Hague: Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110822878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusihuamán, Antonio. 1976. Gramática quechua, Cuzco-Collao. Lima: Ministerio de Educación del Perú.Google Scholar
Davies, Alan. 1991. The native speaker in applied linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Alan. 2003. The native speaker: Myth and reality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI: 10.21832/9781853596247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Alan. 2013. Is the native speaker dead? Histoire Épistémologie Langage 35(2). 17–28. Online: https://www.persee.fr/doc/hel_0750-8069_2013_num_35_2_3455.Google Scholar
Davis, Jenny L. 2018. Talking Indian: Identity and language revitalization in the Chickasaw renaissance. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Jenny L. 2021. Famous ‘last’ speakers: Celebrity and erasure in media coverage of Indigenous language endangerment. Indigenous celebrity: Entanglements with fame, ed. by Adese, Jennifer and Innes, Rob, 163–76. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780887559228-008.Google Scholar
de la Cadena, Marisol. 2000. Indigenous mestizos: The politics of race and culture in Cuzco, Peru, 1919–1991. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822397021.Google Scholar
de la Cadena, Marisol. 2015. Earth beings: Ecologies of practice across Andean worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822375265.Google Scholar
de Nebrija, Antonio. 1999. Tratado sobre la educación de los hijos. Trans. by Pedro Arias. Estudio y notas de Lorenzo Velázquez Campo. Cuadernos de Anuario Filosófico 1999. 96–128.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 2005. Linguists' most dangerous myth: The fallacy of Creole exceptionalism. Language in Society 34. 533–91. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404505050207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delforge, Ann Marie. 2012. ‘Nobody wants to sound like a provinciano‘: The recession of unstressed vowel devoicing in the Spanish of Cusco, Perú. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16. 311–35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2012.00538.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2018. Why the dichotomy ‘L1 versus LX user’ is better than ‘native versus non-native speaker’. Applied Linguistics 39. 236–40. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amw055.Google Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc, Bak, Thomas H.; and Ortega, Lourdes. 2021. Why the mythical ‘native speaker’ has mud on its face. In Slavkov et al., 23–43. DOI: 10.1515/9781501512353-002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Campos, Manuel, and Balasch, Sonia (eds.) 2023. The handbook of usage-based linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781119839859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doerr, Neriko Musha (ed.) 2009. The native speaker concept: Ethnographic investigations of native speaker effects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110220957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 2009. Linguistic anthropology: History, ideas, and issues. Linguistic anthropology: A reader, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro, 1–60. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Durston, Alan. 2007. Pastoral Quechua: The history of Christian translation in colonial Peru, 1550–1654. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvpg8689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egido, Alex, and De Costa, Peter. 2022. Colonial narrative of ethics in research: Telling stories and imagining decolonial futures in applied linguistics. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 1:100016. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emlen, Nicholas Q. 2017. Perspectives on the Quechua-Aymara contact relationship and the lexicon and phonology of Pre-Proto-Aymara. International Journal of American Linguistics 83. 307–40. DOI: 10.1086/689911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emlen, Nicholas Q. 2020. Language, coffee, and migration on an Andean-Amazonian frontier. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Online: https://muse.jhu.edu/book/73833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanon, Frantz. 1952. Black skin, white masks. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Flores, Nelson, and Schissel, Jamie L.. 2014. Dynamic bilingualism as the norm: Envisioning a heteroglossic approach to standards-based reform. TESOL Quarterly 48. 454–79. DOI: 10.1002/tesq.182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, Jean. 2006. ‘Alien to modernity’: The rationalization of discrimination. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies 15. 171–81. DOI: 10.1080/13569320600782195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2006. Contradictions of standard language in Europe: Implications for the study of practices and publics. Social Anthropology 14. 163–81. DOI: 10.1017/S0964028206002515.Google Scholar
García, María Elena. 2005. Making indigenous citizens: Identities, education, and multicultural development in Peru. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, Ofelia. 2019. Decolonizing foreign, second, heritage, and first languages: Implications for education. Decolonizing foreign language education, ed. by Macedo, Donaldo, 152–68. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Godenzzi, Juan C. (ed.) 1992. El quechua en debate: Ideología, normalización y enseñanza. Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos Bartolomé de Las Casas.Google Scholar
Goldrick, Matthew, and Cole, Jennifer. 2023. Advancement of phonetics in the 21st century: Exemplar models of speech production. Journal of Phonetics 99:101254. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graddol, David. 1999. The decline of the native speaker/Le déclin du locuteur natif. English in a changing world/L'anglais dans un monde changeant, ed. by Graddol, David and Meinhof, Ulrike H., 57–68. Oxford: Catchline.Google Scholar
Grammon, Devin. 2018. Acquiring Cuzco: Marginalized language, ideology, and study abroad in Peru. Columbus: The Ohio State University dissertation. Online: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu153198451440002.Google Scholar
Grammon, Devin. 2022. Es un mal castellano cuando decimos ‘su‘: Language instruction, raciolinguistic ideologies and study abroad in Peru. Linguistics and Education 71:101078. DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2022.101078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephan. 1990. Learning to curse: Essays in early modern culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gries, Stephen Th. 2013. Data in construction grammar. The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, ed. by Hoffmann, Thomas and Trousdale, Graeme, 93–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0006.Google Scholar
Gualapuro Gualapuro, Santiago. 2023. Imbabura Kichwa: Activism, ideologies and linguistic production and change. Columbus: The Ohio State University dissertation. Online: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1689325678165042.Google Scholar
Guion, Susan G. 2003. The vowel systems of Quichua-Spanish bilinguals: Age of acquisition effects on the mutual influence of the first and second languages. Phonetica 60. 98–128. DOI: 10.1159/000071449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hackert, Stephanie. 2012. The emergence of the English native speaker: A chapter in nineteenth-century linguistic thought. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9781614511052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren, and Nycz, Jennifer (eds.) 2024. Sociophonetics: Implications for phonetics and phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, to appear.Google Scholar
Hannahs, S. J., and Bosch, Anna. 2018. The study of phonology in the 21st century. The Routledge handbook of phonological theory, ed. by Hannahs, S. J. and Bosch, Anna, 1–10. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hauck, Jan David. 2023. Language otherwise: Linguistic natures and the ontological challenge. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 33. 4–24. DOI: 10.1111/jola.12384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce P. 1999. Phonetically driven phonology: The role of optimality theory and inductive grounding. Functionalism and formalism in linguistics, vol. 1: General papers, ed. by Darnell, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith A., Noonan, Michael, Newmeyer, Frederick J., and Wheatley, Kathleen, 243–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Kuteva, Tania. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511614132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, Arturo E., Bodet, Jean P. III, Gehm, Kevin; and Shen, Shutian. 2021. What does a critical period for second language acquisition mean?: Reflections on Hartshorne et al. (2018). Cognition 206:104478. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 1992. ‘Today there is no respect’: Nostalgia, ‘respect’ and oppositional discourse in Mexicano (Nahuatl) language ideology. Pragmatics 2. 263–80. DOI: 10.1075/prag.2.3.09hil.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 2009. The everyday language of white racism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781444304732.Google Scholar
Holliday, Adrian. 2006. Native-speakerism. ELT Journal 60. 385–87. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccl030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, Nicole, and Martin, Sean. 2018. Vowel categories and allophonic lowering among Bolivian Quechua–Spanish bilinguals. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 48. 199–222. DOI: 10.1017/S0025100317000512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornberger, Nancy H. 1995. Five vowels or three? Linguistics and politics in Quechua language planning in Peru. Power and inequality in language education, ed. by Tollefson, James W., 187–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hornberger, Nancy H., and Coronel-Molina, Serafín M.. 2004. Quechua language shift, maintenance, and revitalization in the Andes: The case for language planning. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 167. 9–67. DOI: 10.1515/ijsl.2004.025.Google Scholar
Houghton, Stephanie A., and Hashimoto, Kayoko (eds.) 2018. Towards post-native-speakerism: Dynamics and shifts. Singapore: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-7162-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Rosaleen. 2007. Por los linderos de la lengua: Ideologías lingüísticas en los andes. Lima: Fondo Editorial Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard-Malverde, Rosaleen. 1995. ‘Pachamama is a Spanish word’: Linguistic tension between Aymara, Quechua, and Spanish in northern Potosí (Bolivia). Anthropological Linguistics 37. 141–68. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/30028309.Google Scholar
Huayhua, Margarita. 2010. Runama kani icha alquchu?: Everyday discrimination in the southern Andes. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan dissertation. Online: https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78888.Google Scholar
Huayhua, Margarita. 2014. Racism and social interaction in a southern Peruvian combi. Ethnic and Racial Studies 37. 2399–2417. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2013.809129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huayhua, Margarita, and Mannheim, Bruce. 2022. Registros orales del quechua y discriminación en el sur de los Andes. Lengua y Sociedad 21. 55–68. DOI: 10.15381/lengsoc.v21i2.23625.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, Kenneth, and Abrahamsson, Niclas. 2001. Comments on Stefka H. Marinova-Todd, D. Bradford Marshall, and Catherine E. Snow's ‘Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning’: The hazards of matching practical ‘implications’ with theoretical ‘facts’. TESOL Quarterly 35. 151–70. DOI: 10.2307/3587863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioup, Georgette, Boustagi, Elizabeth, Tigi, Manal El; and Moselle, Martha. 1994. Re-examining the critical period hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16. 73–98. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100012596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith, and Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, ed. by Kroskrity, Paul V., 35–84. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Itier, César. 1992. ‘Cuzqueñistas’ y ‘foráneos’: Las resistencias a la normalización de la esciritura del quechua. El quechua en debate: Ideología, normalización y enseñanza, ed. by Godenzzi, Juan C., 85–93. Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos Bartolomé de Las Casas.Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. 2017. Extended/distributed cognition and the native speaker. Language & Communication 57. 37–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Ronald M., and Bresnan, Joan. 1982. Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. The mental representation of grammatical relations, ed. by Bresnan, Joan, 173–281. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Herbert S. 2011. A concise history of Bolivia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511976964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koulidobrova, Elena, and Pichler, Deborah Chen. 2021. Cripping the ‘delay’: Multilingualism-related consequences of re-labeling language deprivation systems. Frontiers in Communication 6:751457. DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2021.751457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koulidobrova, Elena, and Pichler, Deborah Chen. 2024. Crip linguistics for (second) language acquisition. Crip linguistics reader, ed. by Henner, Jon, Robinson, Octavian, and Moriarty, Erin. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, to appear.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Gitten. 2006. Towards a usage-based cognitive phonology. International Journal of English Studies 6. 107–40. Online: https://revistas.um.es/ijes/article/view/48881.Google Scholar
Kvietok Dueñas, Frances. 2019. Youth bilingualism, identity and Quechua language planning and policy in the urban Peruvian Andes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation. Online: https://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/30301.Google Scholar
Kvietok Dueñas, Frances, and Chaparro, Sofia. 2023. Raciolinguistic ideologies. The Routledge handbook of multilingualism, 2nd edn., ed. by McKinney, Carolyn, Makoe, Pinky, and Zavala, Virginia, 47–62. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaCharité, Darlene, and Paradis, Carole. 2005. Category preservation and proximity versus phonetic approximation in loanword adaptation. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 223–58. DOI: 10.1162/0024389053710666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric H. 1967. Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Wesley Y. 2008. When is an ‘extinct language’ not extinct? Miami, a formerly sleeping language. Sustaining linguistic diversity: Endangered and minority languages and language varieties, ed. by King, Kendall A., Schilling-Estes, Natalie, Fogle, Lyn, Lou, Jia Jackie, and Soukup, Barbara, 23–33. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, Wesley Y. 2017. Producing language reclamation by decolonising ‘language’. Language Documentation and Description 14. 15–36. DOI: 10.25894/ldd146.Google Scholar
Leonard, Wesley Y. 2023. Challenging ‘extinction’ through modern Miami language practices. American Indian Culture and Research Journal 35. 135–60. Online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8601p9p7.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Simons, Gary F.; and Fennig, Charles D. (eds.) 2013. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 17th edn. Dallas: SIL International. Online: https://www.ethnologue.com/.Google Scholar
Lipski, John M. 2015. Colliding vowel systems in Andean Spanish: Carryovers and emergent properties. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5. 91–121. DOI: 10.1075/lab.5.1.04lip.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, Adrienne, and Chun, Elaine. 2020. Language, race, and reflexivity: A view from linguistic anthropology. The Oxford handbook of language and race, ed. by Alim, H. Samy, Reyes, Angela, and Kroskrity, Paul V., 35–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190845995.013.2.Google Scholar
López, Belem G., Luque, Alicia; and Piña-Watson, Brandy. 2023. Context, intersectionality, and resilience: Moving toward a more holistic study of bilingualism in cognitive science. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology 29. 24–33. DOI: 10.1037/cdp0000472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, Nigel, and Ansaldo, Umberto. 2010. The native speaker and the mother tongue. Language Sciences 32. 589–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2010.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, Roy C. 1993. Losing English as a first language. Modern Language Journal 76. 190–208. DOI: 10.2307/329772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makoni, Sinfree, and Pennycook, Alastair. 2006. Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Disinventing and reconstituting languages, ed. by Makoni, Sinfree and Pennycook, Alastair, 1–41. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI: 10.21832/9781853599255-003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, Bruce. 1991. The language of the Inka since the European invasion. Austin: University of Texas Press. DOI: 10.7560/746633.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Bruce. 2015. All translation is radical translation. Translating worlds: The epistemological space of translation, ed. by Severi, Carlo and Hanks, William F., 199–219. Chicago: Hau Books. Online: https://haubooks.org/translating-worlds/.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Bruce. 2018. Three axes of variability in Quechua: Regional diversification, contact with other indigenous languages, and social enregisterment. The Andean world, ed. by Seligmann, Linda J. and Fine-Dare, Kathleen S., 507–23. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Bruce. 2022. Mother tongue, father tongue, place tongue: Twenty-first-century language transmission and language survival in the Andes and Western Amazonia. Journal of Anthropological Research 78. 407–19. DOI: 10.1086/721974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, Bruce, and Carreño, Guillermo Salas. 2015. Wak'as: Entifications of the Andean sacred. The archaeology of wak'as: Explorations of the sacred in the pre-Columbian Andes, ed. by Bray, Tamara, 46–72. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Bruce, and Tedlock, Dennis. 1995. Introduction. The dialogic emergence of culture, ed. by Mannheim, Bruce and Tedlock, Dennis, 1–32. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Mayberry, Rachel I., and Kluender, Robert. 2018. Rethinking the critical period for language: New insights into an old question from American Sign Language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21(5). 886–905. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728917000724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGowan, Kevin. 2024. Speech perception. In Hall-Lew & Nycz, to appear.Google Scholar
McGowan, Kevin, and Babel, Anna M.. 2020. Perceiving isn't believing: Divergence in levels of sociolinguistic awareness. Language in Society 49. 231–56. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404519000782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, Barbra A. 2012. We are our language: An ethnography of language revitalization in a Northern Athabaskan community. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt181hwzg.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 2010. New Englishes and the native speaker debate. Language Sciences 32. 594–601. DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2010.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Leslie. 2000. Britain and the United States: Two nations divided by the same language (and different language ideologies). Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10. 56–89. DOI: 10.1525/jlin.2000.10.1.56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, Alene. 1999. Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21. 81–108. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263199001035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, Alene. 2013. Foreign accent: The phenomenon of non-native speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511794407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter. 2000. Language planning and language ecology. Current Issues in Language Planning 1. 306–67. DOI: 10.1080/14664200008668011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, Carmen, and Singleton, David. 2007. Foreign accent in advanced learners: Two successful profiles. EUROSLA Yearbook 7. 171–90. DOI: 10.1075/eurosla.7.10mun.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myhill, John. 2003. The native speaker, identity, and the authenticity hierarchy. Language Sciences 25. 77–97. DOI: 10.1016/S0388-0001(01)00023-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NapuríEspejo, Andrés. 2011. Categorización de vocales anteriores en hablantes bilingües quechua-español. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú BA thesis. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/726.Google Scholar
Narayanan, Sandhya Krittika. 2018. Are we one?: Quechua-Aymara contact and the challenges of boundary maintenance in Puno, Peru. Language & Communication 62. 145–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikanne, Urpo, and Östman, Jan-Ola. 2006. Finland-Swedish directionality in conceptual semantics and in construction grammar: A methodological dialogue. SKY Journal of Linguistics 19. 66–86. Online: https://www.linguistics.fi/julkaisut/sky2006special.shtml.Google Scholar
Nikolov, Marianne. 2000. The critical period hypothesis reconsidered: Successful adult learners of Hungarian and English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 38. 109–24. DOI: 10.1515/iral.2000.38.2.109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nycz, Jennifer. 2024. Contrast and representations. In Hall-Lew & Nycz, to appear.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Erin. 2010. Dialect differences and the bilingual vowel space in Peruvian Spanish. Selected proceedings of the 4th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, ed. by Ortega-Llebaria, Marta, 20–30. Online: https://www.lingref.com/cpp/lasp/4/abstract2363.html.Google Scholar
Ortega, Lourdes. 2013. SLA for the 21st century: Disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi/multilingual turn. Language Learning 63. 1–24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00735.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Lourdes. 2019. SLA and the study of equitable multilingualism. The Modern Language Journal 103. 23–38. DOI: 10.1111/modl.12525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Lourdes. 2020. The study of heritage language development from a bilingualism and social justice perspective. Language Learning 70. 15–53. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paikeday, Thomas M. 1985. The native speaker is dead!: An informal discussion of a linguistic myth with Noam Chomsky and other linguists, philosophers, psychologists, and lexicographers. Toronto and New York: Paikeday Publishing.Google Scholar
Pakendorf, Brigitte, Dobrushina, Nina; and Khanina, Olesya. 2021. A typology of small-scale multilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism 25. 835–59. DOI: 10.1177/13670069211023137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquale, Michael. 2009. Phonological variation in a Peruvian Quechua speech community. Variation in indigenous minority languages, ed. by Stanford, James N. and Preston, Dennis R., 245–58. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Perez, Danae, Hundt, Marianne, Kabatek, Johannes; and Schreier, Daniel. 2021. English and Spanish: World languages in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108623469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Silva, Jorge Iván. 2011. Las innumerables vocales del quechua. Estudios sobre lenguas andinas y amazónicas: Homenaje a Rodolfo Cerrón Palomino, ed. by Adelaar, William F. H., Bismark, Pilar Valenzuela, and Biondi, Roberto Zariquiey, 211–31. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Pérez-Silva, Jorge Iván, Palma, Jorge Acuario; and Araujo, Raúl Bendezú. 2008. Contra el prejuicio lingüístico de la motosidad: Un estudio de las vocales del castellano andino desde la fonética acústica. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Instituto Riva-Agüero.Google Scholar
Perley, Bernard C. 2020. Indigenous translocality: Emergent cosmogonies in the new world order. Theory & Event 23. 977–1003. DOI: 10.1353/tae.2020.0059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfänder, Stefan. 2009. Gramática mestiza: Con referencia al castellano de Cochabamba. La Paz: Instituto Boliviano de Lexicografía y otros Estudios Lingüísticos.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001. Stochastic phonology. Glot International 5. 195–207.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet, Beckman, Mary E.; and Ladd, D. Robert. 2000. Conceptual foundations of phonology as a laboratory science. Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues, ed. by Burton-Roberts, Noel, Carr, Philip, and Docherty, Gerald, 273–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198241270.003.0011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinta, Justin. 2022. Minority language resilience in Corrientes, Argentina: Argentine Guarani and Spanish in contact. Columbus: The Ohio State University dissertation. Online: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1658243431760415.Google Scholar
Pirc, Anna Monika. 2013. Construction grammar and ‘non-native discourse’. Theory and Practice in English Studies 4. 55–73. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/129820.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. 2006. The language of the gods in the world of men: Sanskrit, culture, and power in premodern India. Berkeley: University of California Press. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pnqs7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1996. Whaddayaknow?: The modes of folk linguistic awareness. Language Awareness 5. 40–74. DOI: 10.1080/09658416.1996.9959890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, Edward T., and Suter, Richard W.. 1980. Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A reexamination. Language Learning 30. 271–87. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00319.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil. 1997. Linguistics and the myth of nativity: Comments on the controversy over ‘new/non-native Englishes’. Journal of Pragmatics 27. 225–31. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00027-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramjattan, Vijay A. 2019. The white native speaker and inequality regimes in the private English language school. Intercultural Education 30. 126–40. DOI: 10.1080/14675986.2018.1538043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, M. B. H. 1990. Displacing the ‘native speaker’: Expertise, affiliation, and inheritance. ELT Journal 44. 97–101. DOI: 10.1093/eltj/44.2.97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, Charles. 2017. Substance free phonology. The Routledge handbook of phonological theory, ed. by Hannahs, S. J. and Bosch, Anna, 425–52. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richard, Nicolás (ed.) 2008. Mala guerra: Los indígenas en la Guerra del Chaco, 1932–1935. Paris and Asunción: ServiLibros-Museo del Barro-CoLibris.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R., and King, Sharese. 2016. Language and linguistics on trial: Hearing Rachel Jeantel (and other vernacular speakers) in the courtroom and beyond. Language 94. 948–88. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2016.0078.Google Scholar
Rivera, Olga. 2015. La crianza de los hijos en los tratados de educación de Rodrigo Sánchez de Arévalo y Elio Antonio de Nebrija. Cincinnati Romance Review 39. 160–75. Online: https://scholar.uc.edu/concern/parent/x633f2630/articles/2b88qd810.Google Scholar
Rosa, Jonathan. 2016. Standardization, racialization, languagelessness: Raciolinguistic ideologies across communicative contexts. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 26. 162–83. DOI: 10.1111/jola.12116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, Jonathan. 2018. Contesting representations of migrant ‘illegality’ through the Drop the I-Word campaign: Rethinking language change and social change. Language and social justice in practice, ed. by Avineri, Netta, Graham, Laura R., Johnson, Eric J., Riner, Robin Conley, and Rosa, Jonathan, 35–43. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, Jonathan. 2019. Looking like a language, sounding like a race: Raciolinguistic ideologies and the learning of Latinidad. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, Jonathan, and Flores, Nelson. 2017. Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language in Society 46. 621–47. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404517000562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Donald. 1992. Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates' judgments of non-native English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education 33. 511–31. DOI: 10.1007/BF00973770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas Carreño, Guillermo. 2016. Places are kin: Food, cohabitation, and sociality in the southern Peruvian Andes. Anthropological Quarterly 89. 813–40. DOI: 10.1353/anq.2016.0048.Google Scholar
Sicoli, Mark A. 2020. Deliberate decisions and unintended consequences: Ratifying non-speakers through code alteration in child-directed speech. Contact, structure, and change: A festschrift in honor of Sarah G. Thomason, ed. by Babel, Anna M. and Sicoli, Mark, 2–35. Ann Arbor, MI: Maize Books.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra (ed.) 1998. The native speaker: Multilingual perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Slavkov, Nicolay, Melo-Pfeifer, Sílvia; and Kerschhofer-Puhalo, Nadja (eds.) 2021. The changing face of the ‘native speaker’: Perspectives from multilingualism and globalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9781501512353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Jesse. 2015. A comparative analysis of Media Lengua and Quichua vowel production. Phonetica 71. 159–82. DOI: 10.1159/000369629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Jesse. 2018. Vowel perception by native Media Lengua, Quichua, and Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics 71. 177–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2015. Endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139033817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G., and Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/9780520912793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiv, Mehrgol, Kutlu, Ethan, Gullifer, Jason W., Feng, Ruo Ying, Doucerain, Marina M.; and Titone, Debra A.. 2022. Bridging interpersonal and ecological dynamics of cognition through a systems framework of bilingualism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 151. 2128–43. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001174.Google ScholarPubMed
Tiv, Mehrgol, Kutlu, Ethan; and Titone, Debra. 2021. Bilingualism moves us beyond the ideal speaker narrative in cognitive psychology. Bilingualism across the lifespan: Opportunities and challenges for cognitive research in a global society, ed. by Francis, Wendy S., 29–46. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torero, Alfredo. 1964. Los dialectos quechuas. Anales Científicos de la Universidad Agraria 2. 446–78.Google Scholar
Train, Robert. 2003. The (non)native standard language in foreign language education: A critical perspective. The sociolinguistics of foreign-language classrooms: Contributions of the native, the near-native, and the non-native speaker (Issues in language program direction), ed. by Blyth, Carl, 3–39. Boston: Heinle.Google Scholar
Tsehaye, Wintai, Pashkova, Tatiana, Tracy, Rosemarie; and Allen, Shanley E. M.. 2021. Deconstructing the native speaker: Further evidence from heritage speakers for why this horse should be dead! Frontiers in Psychology 12:17352. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Vleet, Krista E. 2008. Performing kinship: Narrative, gender, and the intimacies of power in the Andes. Austin: University of Texas Press. DOI: 10.7560/717077.Google Scholar
Vulchanova, Mila, Vulchanov, Valentin, Sorace, Antonella, Suarez-Gomez, Cristina; and Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro. 2022. The notion of the native speaker put to the test: Recent research advances. Frontiers in Psychology 13:875740. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, Anthony K. 2016. Intimate grammars: An ethnography of Navajo poetry. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv1jf2ck1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yngve, Victor H. 1981. The struggle for a theory of native speaker. A festschrift for native speaker, ed. by Coulmas, Florian, 29–50. The Hague: Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110822878-003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zavala, Virginia. 2011. Racialization of the bilingual student in higher education: A case from the Peruvian Andes. Linguistics and Education 22. 393–405. DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2011.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zavala, Virginia, and Back, Michele (eds.) 2017. Racismo y lenguaje. Lima: Fondo Editorial Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Online: https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/facpubworks/1/.Google Scholar
Zuckermann, Ghil'ad. (2020). Revivalistics: From the genesis of Israeli to language reclamation in Australia and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199812776.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar