Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-7vssv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T17:32:05.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation as a feature of language acquisition in the Trinidad context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Valerie Youssef
Valerie Youssef
Affiliation:
University of the West Indies, St. Augustine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a longitudinal acquisition study of the development of the verb phrase (VP), a Trinidadian child who was exposed to both Standard English (SE) and Trinidadian English-lexicon Creole (TC) was found to use the verb forms of each system differentially according to addressee, discourse mode, semantic intent, and grammatical factors. Systematic variation was first recorded at age 2;7 and continued to develop through to the end of the study at age 4;9. School exposure to demands for SE production resulted in a decline in the child's productive TC competence overall and his movement into mid-range usage of SE and TC. The systems in contact appeared linked for the child in that he produced alternant forms from each one variably in apparent relation to his perception of the appropriate extent and range of their use. The weightings for variable constraints in each area modified over time.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 75 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13:145–204.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1971). Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language 7:457–492.Google Scholar
Biondi, L. (1975). The Italian-American child: His sociolinguistic acculturation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L., & Slobin, D. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58:265–289.Google Scholar
Carrington, L. D. (1978). Language problems in schools of today. Trinidad & Tobago Review 26:15–27.Google Scholar
Carrington, L. D. (1979). Linguistic conflict in Caribbean education. Paper presented at the International Congress on the Psychology of the Child,Paris.Google Scholar
Carrington, L. D. (1981). Talking good – A case of strained speech. Unpublished manuscript, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Faculty of Education.Google Scholar
Fasold, R. (1978). Language variation and linguistic competence. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic. 85–95.Google Scholar
Genesee, F. (1989). Early bilingual development: One language or two? Journal of Child Language 16:161–179.Google Scholar
Gleason, J. B. & Perlmann, R. Y. (1985). Acquiring social variation in speech. In Giles, H. & St. Clair, R. (eds)., Recent advances in language, communication, and social psychology. London: Erlbaum. 86–111.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1984). Syntactic variation and dialect divergence. Linguistics 20:303–327.Google Scholar
Houston, S. (1969). A sociolinguistic consideration of the Black English of children in northern Florida. Language 45:599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, S. (1970). A re-examination of some assumptions about the language of the disadvantaged child. Child Development 41:947–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovac, C. (1980). Children's acquisition of variable features. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Kovac, C., & Adamson, H. D. (1981). Variation theory and first language acquisition. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Variation omnibus. Carbondale: Linguistic Research. 403–410.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 5:715–762.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). The study of language in its social context. In Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 183–259.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1989). The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 1:85–98.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1971). Meaning and the English verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lucas, C., & Borders, D. (1987). Language diversity and classroom discourse. American Educational Research Journal 4(1):119–141.Google Scholar
Purcell, A. (1984). Code shifting Hawaiian style: Children's accommodation along a decreolizing continuum. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46:71–86.Google Scholar
Reid, E. (1978). Social and stylistic variation in the speech of children: Some evidence from Edinburgh. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold. 158–173.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. (1977). The question of prior creolization in Black English. In Valdman, A. (ed.), Pidgin & Creole linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 190–221.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. (1980). How does “doz” disappear? In Day, R. (ed.), Issues in English Creoles. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag. 77–96.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. (1987a). Dimensions of a Creole continuum. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. (1987b). The haves and have nots: Sociolinguistic surveys and the assessment of speaker competence. Language in Society 16:149–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, P. (1988). West Indians and their language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1984). The language of children and adolescents: The acquisition of communicative competence. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sachs, J., & Devin, J. (1976). Young children's use of age-appropriate speech styles in social interaction. Journal of Child Language 3:81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1978). Semilingualism and the education of migrant children as a means of reproducing the caste of assembly line workers. In Dittmar, N. (ed.), Papers from the first Scandinavian-German symposium on the language of immigrant workers and children. Roskilde. 221–251.Google Scholar
Solomon, D. (1966). The system of predication in the speech of Trinidad: A quantitative study of decreolization. M.A. thesis, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Solomon, D. (1972). Form, content, and the post-creole continuum. Paper presented at a conference on Creole Languages & Educational Development,University of the West Indies,St. Augustine.Google Scholar
Spears, A. (1982). The Black English semi-auxiliary come. Language 58:850–872.Google Scholar
Weeks, T. E. (1971). Speech registers in young children. Child Development 42:1119–1131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wellman, H., & Lempers, J. D. (1977). The naturalistic communicative ability of two year olds. Child Development 48:1052–1057.Google Scholar
Winford, D. (1972). A sociolinguistic description of two communities in Trinidad. Ph.D. dissertation, University of York.Google Scholar
Winford, D. (1980). The Creole situation in the context of sociolinguistic studies. In Day, R. (ed.), Issues in English Creoles. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag. 51–76.Google Scholar
Winford, D. (1984). The linguistic variable and syntactic variation in Creole continua. Lingua 62:267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winford, D. (1988). The Creole continuum and the notion of the speech community as locus of language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 71:91–105.Google Scholar
Youssef, V. (1990). The development of linguistic skills in some Trinidadian children: An integrative approach to the development of the verb phrase. Ph.D. dissertation, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine.Google Scholar
Youssef, V. (1991a). The acquisition of varilingual competence. English World-Wide 12(1):87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youssef, V. (1991b). “Can I put – I want a slippers to put on”: Young children's development of request forms in a code-switching environment. Journal of Child Language 18(3):609–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar