Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T17:34:25.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonological leveling, diffusion, and divergence: /t/ lenition in Liverpool and its hinterland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2016

Lynn Clark  and
Kevin Watson
Lynn Clark
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury
Kevin Watson
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the phonological leveling and diffusion of variants of /t/ in Liverpool, northwest England, and two localities in its hinterland. We show that lenited realizations of /t/, thought to be historically restricted to Liverpool, are increasing over time and spreading over geographical space. We explore Labov's (2007) claims that linguistic changes that progress via transmission, within a speech community, are reproduced in all their structural complexity, whereas changes that spread across speech communities, via diffusion, are “simplified” en route. We find support for these hypotheses. Using a comparative sociolinguistic methodology, we show that the linguistic constraints operating on the realization of /t/ as [h] in Liverpool have remained stable over time, while those in a nearby town—Skelmersdale—seem to have simplified. However, we show that not all speakers from Skelmersdale share the same constraints on this variable form, and we connect this with speakers' positive or negative attitudes toward Skelmersdale or Liverpool.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 31 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Baayen, R. Harald, Davidson, Douglas J., & Bates, Douglas M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59:390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranowski, Maciej, & Turton, Danielle. (2015). Manchester English. In Hickey, R. (ed.), Researching Northern English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 283–305.Google Scholar
Barr, Dale. J., Levy, Roger, Scheepers, Christoph, & Tily, Harry J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68:255–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Britain, David. (2005). Innovation diffusion, “Estuary English” and local dialect differentiation: The survival of Fenland Englishes. Linguistics 43(5):995–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, David. (2010). Supralocal regional dialect levelling. In Llamas, C. & Watt, D. (eds.), Language and identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, David. (2013). The role of mundane mobility and contact in dialect death and dialect birth. In Schreier, D. & Hundt, M. (eds.), English as a contact language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, & D'Arcy, Alexandra. (2009). Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(3):291–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas, & Bishop, Hywel. (2007). Ideologised values for British accents. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(1):74–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, Gerard J., & Foulkes, Paul. (1999). Sociophonetic variation in “glottals” in Newcastle English. Proceedings of the 14th ICPhS. Berkeley: University of California. 1037–1040.Google Scholar
Drager, Katie, & Hay, Jennifer. (2012). Exploiting random intercepts: Two case studies in sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change 24(1):59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, & Docherty, Gerard J. (eds.) (1999) Urban voices: Accent students in the British Isles. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
General Register Office. (1967). Sample Census 1966 England and Wales County Report: Lancashire. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
GordonMatthew, J. Matthew, J. (2006) Interview with William Labov. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4):332–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddican, Bill, Hughes, Vincent, Richards, Hazel, & Foulkes, Paul. (2013). Social correlates of two vowel changes in Northern England. Language Variation and Change 25(3):371–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick. (2001). Lenition inhibition in Liverpool English. English Language and Linguistics 5:213–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1):359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. (2014). Progress in regression: Why natural language data calls for mixed-effects models. Self-published manuscript. Available at: http://www.danielezrajohnson.com/johnson_2014.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Knowles, Gerald. (1973). Scouse: The urban dialect of Liverpool. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (2001). Principles of linguistic change. Volume II: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (2007). Transmission and diffusion. Language 81(2):344–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles. (2006). The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger. (1990). Where do extraterritorial Englishes come from? Dialect input and recodification in transported Englishes. In Adamson, S. M., Law, V. A., Vincent, N., & Wright, S. (eds.), Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 245–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llamas, Carmen. (2007). “A place between places”: Language and identity in a border town. Language in Society 36(4):579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam. (2009). Replication, transfer, and calquing: Using variation as a tool in the study of language contact. Language Variation and Change 21(3):297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam, & Niedzielski, Nancy. (2003). The globalisation of vernacular variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(4):534–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Chris. (2007). Northern English dialects: A perceptual approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Chris. (2012). The effect of proximity in perceptual dialectology. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(5):638–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbrook, Mark. (1986). Sociolinguistic reflexes of dialect interference in West Wirral. Bamberg: Bamberger Beitrage Zur Englischen Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. (1971). Census 1971, England and Wales: Lancashire. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. (2002). Comparative sociolinguistics. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., & Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.), Handbook of language variation and change. Malden: Blackwell. 729–763.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1986). Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Watson, Kevin. (2006). Phonological resistance and innovation in the North-West of England. English Today 22(2):55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Kevin. (2007). The phonetics and phonology of plosive lenition in Liverpool English. Ph.D. dissertation, Edge Hill College/Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Watson, Kevin, & Clark, Lynn. (forthcoming). OLIVE: The origins of Liverpool English. In Hickey, R. (ed.), Listening to the past: Audio records of accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watt, Dominic, & Milroy, Lesley. (1999). Patterns of variation and change in three Newcastle vowels: Is this dialect levelling? In Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. J. (eds.), Urban voices: Accent students in the British Isles. Oxford: Blackwell. 25–46.Google Scholar
Wells, John. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Helen. (2015). Accent variation and attitude on the Merseyside/Lancashire border: A sociophonetic study of Southport and Ormskirk. Ph.D. dissertation, University of York.Google Scholar
Williams, Francis. (2012). Is St. Helens in Merseyside or Lancashire? St. Helens Star, March 15, 2012. Available at: http://www.sthelensstar.co.uk/news/letters/9592157.For_almost_40_years_St_Helens_has_faced_an_identity_crisis/. Accessed July 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Thomas, Erik. (2002). The development of African American English. Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar