Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-29T12:13:43.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Defining the envelope of linguistic variation: The case of “don't count” forms in the copula analysis of African American Vernacular English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2009

Renée Blake
Renée Blake
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ever since Labov, Cohen, Robbins, and Lewis's (1968) pioneering study, it has been commonplace to set aside certain tokens in analyzing variability in the English copula as “don't count” (DC) forms. These cases are most often occurrences of the copula that exhibit categorical behavior (as with the full copula in clause-final position), as well as those that are ambiguous or indeterminate. In this article, I propose a set of copula forms that should be set aside from variable analysis as instances of DC forms to allow for systematic comparisons among studies. I review the major alternative descriptions of DC copula cases in the literature and analyze the behavior of the traditional DC categories. New data are presented to support the exclusion of particular DC cases from analyses of copula variability. Among the conclusions are that [was], [thas], and [is] should be excluded from quantitative analyses of variation in the copula because of their invariant status, and that a number of tokens commonly included (e.g., questions) should be excluded on various grounds.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 57 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, Guy, & Maynor, Natalie. (1985). The present tense of be in southern Black folk speech. American Speech 60:195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy, & Maynor, Natalie. (1987). Decreolization? Language in Society 16:449–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Renée. (1992). Accounting for the “don't count” cases in variable rule analysis of the Black Vernacular English copula. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. (1973). Comparative deletion and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 275–344.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. (1981). Variation in the use of ain't in an Urban British English dialect. Language in Society 10:365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, & Halle, Morris. (1968). The sound pattern of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. (1972). Tense marking in Black English. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. (1990). Contraction and deletion in Vernacular Black English: Creole history and relationship to Euro-American English. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. (1992). A government-binding analysis of the structure of African American Vernacular English be2. Paper presented at NWAVE-XX, Duke University.Google Scholar
Green, Lisa. (1992). Topics in African American English syntax: The verbal system analysis. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Green, Lisa. (1994). A unified account of auxiliaries in African American English. To appear in Proceedings of the Thirtieth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Hannah, Dawn. (1995). Samaná English copula and the linguistic history of African American Vernacular English. Paper presented at NWAVE-XXIV, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon, & Zee, Draga. (1993). Auxiliary reduction without empty categories: A prosodic account. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 8: 205–253.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45: 715–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Cohen, Paul, Robins, Clarence, & Lewis, John. (1968). A study of the Nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City, 2 vols. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Martin, Stefan Edmund. (1992). Topics in the syntax of Nonstandard English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
McElhinny, Bonnie. (1993). Copula auxiliary contraction by White speakers of English. American Speech 68: 371–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. (1989). Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, & Sankoff, David. (1987). The Philadelphia story in the Spanish Caribbean. American Speech 62: 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Carmen. (1991). Habitual structures among Blacks and Whites in the 1990s. American Speech 66: 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R., Ball, Arnetha, Blake, Renée, Jackson, Raina, & Martin, Nomi. (1991). Rappin on the copula coffin: Theoretical and methodological issues in the analysis of copula variation in African-American Vernacular English. Language Variation and Change 3: 103–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R., & Blake, Renée. (1990). Contraction and deletion of the copula in Barbadian English. In Hall, K., Koenig, J-P., Meacham, M., Reinman, S., & Sutton, L. A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 257–268.Google Scholar
Stewart, William A. (1970). Toward a history of American Negro dialect. In Williams, F. (Ed.), Language and poverty. Chicago: Markham. 351–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrey, Jane. (1972). The language of Black children in the early grades. New London, CT: Department of Psychology, Connecticut College.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. (1992). Another look at the copula in Black English and Caribbean Creoles. American Speech 67: 21–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, Tracey. (1994). Variability in negation in African American Vernacular English. Language Variation and Change 6: 359–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walter A. (1969). Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walter A. (1974). The relationship of White Southern Speech to Vernacular Black English. Language 50: 498–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar