Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zlgnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T06:49:54.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ELT in Central and Eastern Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2009

Ágnes Enyedi  and
Péter Medgyes
Péter Medgyes
Affiliation:
Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
State-of-the-Art Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , January 1998 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alatis, J.E.(ed.) (1991). Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics 1991. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Anić, V. (1995). Why publish local FLT/L textbooks and materials? Unpublished presentation at Seminar 3, European Centre for Modern Languages, Graz, 7–11 May.Google Scholar
Banks, F. (ed.) (1995). ELTECS third annual conference.Manchester:The British Council.Google Scholar
Bardi, M. (1997). Report on the third ESP networking meeting for East and Central Europe, Bucharest. PROSPER Newsletter, 6, 59–61.Google Scholar
Bodóczky, C. (1996). The case of Hungary. In Kotschy, B. (ed.), Teachers'role and teacher education, 126–9.Google Scholar
Bodóczky, C. & Malderez, A. (1996). Out into schools. In Medgyes, P. & Malderez, A. (eds.), Changing perspectives in teacher education, 62–78.Google Scholar
Bodóczky, C. & Malderez, A. (1997). The INSET impact of a mentoring course. In Hayes, D. (ed.), In-service teacher development: international perspectives, 50–9.Google Scholar
Bogucka, M. (1995). Pilot INSET project Gdansk. In Greet, J. (ed.), ELTECS fourth annual conference, 46–8.Google Scholar
Bolitho, R. (1995). Introducing the new textbooks: a time of change. Together, 1, 1, 5–13.Google Scholar
Bolitho, R. & Woodham, R. (eds.) (1993). Managing change in teacher education. Conference proceedings,Ljubljana:The British Council.Google Scholar
Brabbs, P. (1995). The fast-track programme: an expensive dinosaur? The Polish Teacher Trainer, 3, 4, 63–6.Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. (1986). The English language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Colibaba, A. (1996). Regional networking: local solutions to future professional problems. PROSPER Newsletter, 5, 54–7.Google Scholar
Council Of Europe (1997). Working papers of the second annual colloquy of the European Centre for Modern Languages of the Council of Europe. Graz: Council of Europe, 59–61.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, M. (1997). Introducing the matura in Slovenia: testing in the national curriculum. Novelty, 4, 2, 29–38.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (ed.) (1994). IATEFL Hungary committee report. IATEFL Hungary Newsletter, 3, 3–5.Google Scholar
Dawson, L. & Pospisil, M. (1993). Communicative methodology-parallel courses for trainees and trainers. Perspectives, 2, 27–32.Google Scholar
Drenova, K. (1995). The role of the foreign language teacher. In Greet, J. (ed.), ELTECS fourth annual conference, 62–5.Google Scholar
Drury, J. (1994). Pre-service English teacher training in Poland: the need, the demand and the supply. In Gough, C. & Jankowska, A. (eds.), Directions towards 2000, 39–45.Google Scholar
Enyedi, À. (1997). Just another language or a new vocation? Novelty, 4, 3, 31–47.Google Scholar
Fisiak, J. (1994). Training English language teachers in Poland: recent reform and its future prospects. In Gough, C. & Jankowska, A. (eds.), Directions towards 2000, 7–15.Google Scholar
Gabršček, S. & Bethell, G. (1996). Matura examinations in Slovenia. Ljubljana: National Examinations Centre.Google Scholar
García, Míngez M. L. (1997). Teaching of foreign languages in Europe. Unpublished presentation at the second annual colloquy of the European Centre for Modern Languages of the Council of Europe, Graz, 7–11 May.Google Scholar
Giblin, K. (1995). PDP comes of age. Prodess News, 9, 2–3.Google Scholar
Gill, S. (1993). Insett in Slovakia: past simple, present tense, future perfect? Perspectives, 2, 15–21.Google Scholar
Gill, S. (1995). Spotlight on … Slovakia. Modern English Teacher, 4, 1, 66–70.Google Scholar
Gill, S. & Rebrová, A. (1996). Native and non-native: together we're worth more. Perspectives, 7, 5–11.Google Scholar
Godunc, Z. (1997). Slovenia-national reports. In Working papers of the second annual colloquy of the European Centre for Modern Languages of the Council of Europe, Graz: Council of Europe, 105–9.Google Scholar
Gough, C. (1995). Developing synergy between projects. In Greet, J. (ed.), ELTECS fourth annual conference, 84–7.Google Scholar
Gough, C. & Jankowska, A. (eds.) (1994). Directions towards 2000. Poznan: Instytut Filologii Angielskiej.Google Scholar
Greet, J. (ed.) (1995). ELTECS fourth annual conference.Manchesten:The British Council.Google Scholar
Griffiths, M. (1995). Keeping on track: curriculum development on the three-year teacher training project in the Czech Republic. Perspectives, 5, 5–13.Google Scholar
Hall, M. (1995). Training teachers to do business: developing an INSET model in a new context. In Greet, J. (ed.), ELTECS fourth annual conference, 49–55.Google Scholar
Hartinger, K. (1993). Why language learning difficulties are not always linguistic. Perspectives, 1, 33–5.Google Scholar
Hayes, D. (ed.) (1997). In-service teacher development: international perspectives. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall Europe ELT/The British Council.Google Scholar
Healey, R. (1993). The international working language of engineers: a new challenge for teachers of English in Czechoslovakia. Perspectives, 1, 13–18.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. (1992a). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. (1992b). Tissue rejection and informal orders in ELT projects: Collecting the right information. Applied Linguistics, 13, 4, 403–24.Google Scholar
Hyde, B. (1994). Albanian babies and the bathwater. The Teacher Trainer, 8, 1, 10–13.Google Scholar
Jacobson, J. (1996). ELT in Romania-past and present. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Jacobson, J. & Fletcher, N. (1994). Managing educational change in Romania. ELT Management Newsletter, 16, 1–8.Google Scholar
Jemeršić, J. & Krnajski, Hršak V. (eds.) (1994). HUPE Newsletter.Google Scholar
Kaluberzina, V. (1997). The development of a centralised English language test in Latvia. Novelty, 4, 2, 39–48.Google Scholar
Kazaritskaya, T.A. (1996). Will you be understood in Moscow? International Culture Forum Kosmopolit, 5, 15–27.Google Scholar
Klimiené, E. (1997). Lithuania. Conference Proceedings,Graz:Council of Europe, 72–3.Google Scholar
Komorowska, H. (1991). Second language teaching in Poland prior to the reform of 1990. In Alatis, J.E. (ed.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics 1991, 501–8.Google Scholar
Komorowska, H. (1994). Curriculum development for in-service teacher education in Poland. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, XXVIII, 113–21.Google Scholar
Kotschy, B. (ed.) (1996). Teacher's role and teacher education, 10. Brussels: ATEE Cahiers 10.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (1995). The privilege of the non-native speaker. Plenary address. Long Beach: TESOL.Google Scholar
Krek, J. (ed.) (1996). White paper on education in the Republic of Slovenia. Ljubljana: Ministry of Education and Sport.Google Scholar
Kryszewska, H. (1995). Are coursebooks taxing enough? In Banks, F. (ed.) ELTECS third annual conference, 70–2.Google Scholar
Leontieva, T. (1997). Belarus-national reports. In Working papers of the second annual colloquy of the European Centre for Modern Languages of the Council of Europe, Graz: Council of Europe, 21–4.Google Scholar
Lozanov, G. (1979). Suggestology and outlines of suggestopedy. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Maguire, B. (1994). Changes in the trainers. Prodess News, 5, 2–3.Google Scholar
Major, É (1997). The new Matura examination in Lithuania: an example to follow? Novelty, 4, 3, 48–51.Google Scholar
Maley, A. (1992). An open letter to ‘the profession’. English Language Teaching journal, 46, 1, 96–9.Google Scholar
McGovern, J. (1995). Changing paradigms-the project approach. PROSPER Newsletter, 4, 8–16.Google Scholar
Medgyes, P. (1992). Native or non-native: who's worth more? English Language Teaching Journal 46, 4, 340–9.Google Scholar
Medgyes, P. (1993). The national L2 curriculum in Hungary. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 24–36.Google Scholar
Medgyes, P. (1994). The non-native teacher. Hammondsworth: Macmillan Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Medgyes, P. & Kaplan, R. B. (1992). Discourse in a foreign language: the example of Hungarian scholars. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 98, 67–100.Google Scholar
Medgyes, P. & Malderez, A. (eds.) (1996). Changing perspectives in teacher education. Oxford: Heinemann English Language Teaching.Google Scholar
Mere, K. (1997). Estonia-national reports. In Working papers of the second annual colloquy of the European Centre for Modern Languages of the Council of Europe, Graz: Council of Europe, 37–43.Google Scholar
Muresan, L. (ed.) (1996). QUEST Romania. 1.Google Scholar
Művelődési, ÉS Közktatási Minisztérium (1988–1996). Statisztikai tájékoztató [Statistical data]. Budapest: Művelődésiés Közoktatási Minisztérium.Google Scholar
Nica, D. (ed.) (1995). Interview with John McGovern. PROSPER Newsletter, 4, 5–6.Google Scholar
Niezgoda, E. (1997). Poland-national reports. In Working papers of the second annual colloquy of the European Centre for Modern Languages of the Council of Europe, Graz: Council of Europe, 90–2.Google Scholar
Patel, S. (1995). Is the school leaving exam really an exam? Perspectives, 5, 21–6.Google Scholar
Peace Corps (1997). Program evaluation (internal documentation).Google Scholar
Pearson, I. (1995). An English language teachers' resource centre as a base for projects in staff, curriculum, materials and test development: how one thing leads to another. In Greet, J. (ed.), ELTECS fourth annual conference, 80–3.Google Scholar
Petreanu, E. (1997). QUEST. PROSPER Newsletter, 6, 66.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R. (1992) ELT: the native speaker's burden. English Language Teaching journal, 46, 1, 12–17.Google Scholar
Pociecha, S., Howard, (1992). Open letter to the Peace Corps, the US Embassy English Teaching Office, NKJO Directors, and whom it may concern. IATEFL Newsletter, 117, 12–13.Google Scholar
Prech, V. (1995). ‘Is the school leaving exam really an exam?’ That was the question. Perspectives, 6, 15–19.Google Scholar
Pugsley, J. (1994). Towards a Polish accreditation system. In Gough, C. & Jankowska, A. (eds.), Directions towards 2000, 22–4.Google Scholar
Pugsley, J. & Kershaw, G. (eds.) (1996). Voices from the new democracies: the impact of British English language teaching in central and eastern Europe. Manchester: The British Council.Google Scholar
Rádai, P. (1996). The Hungarian in-service training program for teachers of English. Budapest: Centre for English Teacher Training. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Radulova, M. (1996). Problems and prospects of foreign language teaching in Bulgarian schools. Foreign Language Teaching, 1, 4–18.Google Scholar
Sebbage, S. & Sebbage, T. (eds.) (1994). NELLE Newsletter, 5, 2.Google Scholar
Setényi, J. (ed.) (1996). National core curriculum. Budapest: Ministry of Culture and Education.Google Scholar
Stewart, I. (1997). Farewell Croatia! HUPE Newsletter, 11, 3–4.Google Scholar
Strzemeski, K. (1995). Getting the most out of your native speaker teachers. The Polish Teacher Trainer, 3, 3, 10–12.Google Scholar
Stuart, A. (1993). EFL in East and Central Europe. IATEFL Newsletter, 118, p. 14.Google Scholar
Sutherland-Smith, J. (1996). Spotlight on … Slovakia. Modern English Teacher, 5, 1, 61–3.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1993). The English language and its teachers: thoughts past, present and future. English Language Teaching journal, 47, 4, 283–91.Google Scholar
Teemant, A.Varga, Z. & Heltai, P. (1993). Hungary's nationwide needs analysis of vocationally-oriented foreign language learning: student, teacher and business community perspectives. Budapest: Hungarian Ministry of Culture and Education.Google Scholar
Van Ek, J. A. & Trim, J. L. M. (1991). Threshold level 1990. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: a reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1992). Visits to Hungary and Romania. The British Council (internal documentation).Google Scholar
Wiseman, A. (1997). ‘Trick or treat?’ Responses to innovations in INSET in Bulgaria. In Hayes, D. (ed.), In-service teacher development: international perspectives, 8–19.Google Scholar
Yeo, S. (1995). ESP in Slovakia and Romania: more similarities than differences. Prosper Newsletter, 4, 39–40.Google Scholar