Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T19:04:39.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language and gender

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

Janet Holmes
Janet Holmes
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Wellington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
State-of-the-Art Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , October 1991 , pp. 207 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abu-Haidar, Farida (1989). Are Iraqi women more prestige-conscious than men? Sex differentiation in Baghdadi Arabic. Language in Society, 18, 4, 471–81.Google Scholar
Aries, Elizabeth J. (1976). Interaction patterns and themes of male, female and mixed groups. Small Group Behaviour, 7, 1, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aries, Elizabeth J. (1987). Gender and communication. In Shaver, Phillip & Hendrick, Clyde (eds.), Sex and gender, 149–76. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Aries, Elizabeth J. & Johnson, Fern L. (1983). Close friendship in adulthood: conversational content between same-sex friends. Sex Roles, 9, 12, 1183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Paddy (1990). Politeness revisited: the dark side. In Bell, Allan & Holmes, Janet (eds.), New Zealand ways of speaking English, 276–93. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bailey, Lee Ann & Timm, Lenora (1976). More on women's – and men's – expletives. Anthropological Linguistics, 18, 438–49.Google Scholar
Baron, Dennis E. (1986). Grammar and gender. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Chris (1988). Male/female colour discrimination. Occasional Papers in Language and Linguistics, 1, 1–8. Christchurch: Department of English Language and Literature, University of Canterbury.Google Scholar
Bashiruddin, Ayesha, Edge, Julian & Hughes-Pélégrin, Elizabeth (1990). Who speaks in seminars? Status, culture and gender at Durham University. In Clark, Romy, Fairclough, Norman, Ivanic, Roz, McLeod, Nicki, Thomas, Jenny & Meara, Paul (eds.), Language and power, 74–84. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching.Google Scholar
Baumann, Marie, (1979). Two features of ‘women's speech’. In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel M. Crouch (eds.), 32–40.Google Scholar
Bayard, Donn (1986). Class and change in New Zealand English: a summary report. Te Reo, 30, 3–36.Google Scholar
Bayard, Donn (1981). Antipodean accents and the ‘cultural cringe’. Te Reo, 35 (in press).Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey W. (1981). Interruption in conversational interaction and its relation to the sex and status of the interactants. Linguistics, 19, 15–35.Google Scholar
Becker, Judith A. & Smenner, Patricia C. (1986). The spontaneous use of ‘thank you’ by pre-schoolers as a function of sex, socioeconomic status, and listener status. Language in Society, 15, 4, 537–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellinger, David C. & Gleason, Jean Berko (1982). Sex differences in parental directives to young children. Sex Roles, 8, 11, 1123–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilous, Frances R. & Krauss, Robert M. (1988). Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads. Language and Communication, 8, 3/4, 183–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaubergs, Maija S. (1980). An analysis of classic arguments against changing sexist language. In Cheris Kramarae (ed.), 135–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blewitt, L. (1988). Metaphor and conflict in feminist organizations. Women and Language, 11, 1, 40–43.Google Scholar
Bodine, Anne (1975 a). Sex differentiation in language. In Barrie Thorne & Nancy Henley (eds.), 130–51.Google Scholar
Bodine, Anne (1975 b). Andocentrism in prescriptive grammar. Language in Society, 4, 2, 129–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boe, S. Kathryn (1987). Language as an expression of caring in women. Anthropological Linguistics, 29, 3, 271–85.Google Scholar
Bradac, James J. & Mulac, Anthony (1984). A molecular view of powerful and powerless speech styles. Communication Monographs, 51, 307–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Virginia R. (1982). Sex differences in student dominance behaviour in female and male professors' classrooms. Sex Roles, 8, 683–90.Google Scholar
Brouwer, Dédé (1982). The influence of the addressee's sex on politeness in language use. Linguistics, 20, 1/2, 697–711.Google Scholar
Brouwer, Dédé & De Haan, Dorian (eds) (1987). Women's language, socialisation and self-image. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Brouwer, Dédé, Gerritsen, Marinel & De Haan, Dorian (1979). Speech differences between women and men: on the wrong track? Language in Society, 8, 1, 33–50.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope (1980). Why and how are women more polite? In Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker & Nelly Furman (eds.), 111–36.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope (1990). Gender, politeness and confrontation in Tenejapa. Discourse Processes, 13, 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen (1978). Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena. In Goody, Esther N. (ed.), Questions and politeness, 56–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah (1985). Feminism and linguistic theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah (1988). Introduction. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 3–12.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah & Coates, Jennifer (1988). Some problems in the sociolinguistic explanation of sex differences. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 13–26.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, McAlinden, Fiona & O'Leary, Kathy (1988). Lakoff in context. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 74–93.Google Scholar
Cannon, G. & Robertson, S. (1985). Sexism in present-day English: is it diminishing? Word, 36, 1, 23–35.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny (1982). Variation in an English dialect: a sociolinguistic study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer (1986). Women, men and language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer (1988). Gossip revisited: language in all-female groups. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 94–122.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer & Cameron, Deborah (eds.) (1988). Women in their speech communities. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robert L. (1984). The avoidance of androcentric generics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 50, 5–20.Google Scholar
Crawford, Mary & English, Linda (1984). Generic versus specific inclusion of women in language: effects on recall. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13, 5, 373–81.Google Scholar
Crosby, Faye & Nyquist, Linda (1977). The female register: an empirical study of Lakoffs hypotheses. Language in Society, 6, 3, 313–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, Sisir Kumar (1968). Forms of address and terms of reference in Bengali. Anthropological Linguistics, 10, 4, 19–30.Google Scholar
Deuchar, Margaret (1988). A pragmatic account of women's use of standard speech. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 27–32.Google Scholar
Dindia, Kathryn (1987). The effects of sex of subject and sex of partner on interruptions. Human Communication Research, 13, 3, 345–71.Google Scholar
Dubois, Betty Lou & Crouch, Isobel M. (1975). The question of tag questions in women's speech: they don't really use more of them, do they? Language in Society, 4, 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Betty Lou & Crouch, Isobel M. (eds.) (1978). American minority women in sociolinguistic perspective. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 17.Google Scholar
Dubois, Betty Lou & Crouch, Isobel M. (eds.) (1979). The sociology of the languages of American women. San Antonio, Texas: Trinity University Press.Google Scholar
Eakins, Barbara & Eakins, Gene (1978). Sex differences in human communication. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Eakins, Barbara & Eakins, Gene (1979). Verbal turn-taking and exchanges in faculty dialogue. In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel M. Crouch (eds.), 53–62.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (1990). Cooperative competition in adolescent ‘girl talk’. Discourse Processes, 13, 91–122.Google Scholar
Edelsky, Carole (1977). Acquisition of an aspect of communicative competence: learning what it means to talk like a lady. In Ervin-Tripp, Susan & Mitchell-Kernan, Claudia (eds.), Child discourse, 225–43. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Edelsky, Carole (1981). Who's got the floor? Language in Society, 10, 383–421.Google Scholar
Edwards, Viv (1986). Language in a Black community. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Edwards, Viv (1988). The speech of British Black women in Dudley, West Midlands. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 33–50.Google Scholar
Edwards, Walter F. (1979). Speech acts in Guyana: communicating ritual and personal insults. Journal of Black Studies, 10, 1, 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisikovits, Edina (1989). Girl-talk/boy-talk: sex differences in adolescent speech. In Collins, Peter & Blair, David (eds.), Australian English, 35–54. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Elyan, O., Smith, Philip, Giles, Howard & Bourhis, Richard (1978). R.P-accented female speech: the voice of perceived androgyny? In Trudgill, Peter (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English, 122–31. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Erickson, Bonnie, Lind, E. Allan, Johnson, Bruce C. & O'Barr, William (1978). Speech style and impression formation in a court setting. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 266–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposrro, Anita (1979). Sex differences in children's conversation. Language and Speech, 22, 213–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John L. (1958). Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant. Word, 14, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Pamela M. (1980). Conversational insecurity. In Howard Giles, W. Peter Robinson, & Phillip M. Smith (eds.), 127–132.Google Scholar
Fishman, Pamela M. (1983). Interaction: the work women do. In Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae & Nancy Henley (eds.), 89–101.Google Scholar
Folb, Edith A. (1980). Runnin' down some lines: the language and culture of black teenagers. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Foote, Russell & Woodward, Jack (1973). A preliminary investigation of obscene language. The Journal of Psychology 83, 263–75.Google Scholar
Frank, Francine & Anshen, Frank (1983). Language and the sexes. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Garcia, Gilbert Narro & Frosch, Susan F. (1976). Sex, color and money: who's perceiving what? In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel M. Crouch (eds.), 63–71.Google Scholar
Gardner, Carol Brooks (1984). Passing by: street remarks, address rights, and the urban female. In Baugh, John & Sherzer, Joel L. (eds.), Language in use: reading in sociolinguistics, 148–64. Englewood Cliffs N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gass, Silvia M. & Varonis, Evangeline M. (1985). Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In Day, D. (ed.), Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Robinson, W. Peter & Smith, Philip M. (eds.) Language: social psychological perspectives. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Smith, Philip, Browne, M., Whiteman, C. & Williams, J. A. (1980). Women's speech: the voice of feminism. In Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker & Nelly Furman (eds.), 150–6.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Smith, Philip, Ford, B., Condor, S. & Thakerar, J. (1980). Speech styles and the fluctuating salience of sex. Language Sciences, 2, 260–82.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol (1982). In a different voice. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gleason, Jean Berko (1987). Sex differences in parent-child interaction. In Susan U, Philips, Susan Steele, & Christine Tanz (eds.), 189–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1980). Directive-response speech sequences in girls' and boys' task activities. In Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker & Nelly Furman (eds.), 157–73.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1988). Cooperation and competition across girls' and boys' task activities. In Alexandra D. Todd & Sue Fisher (eds.), 55–94.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1990). Tactical uses of stories: participation frameworks within girls' and boys' disputes. Discourse Processes, 13, 33–71.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. & Goodwin, Charles (1987). Children's arguing. In Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele & Christine Tanz (eds.), 200–48.Google Scholar
Graddol, David & Swann, Joan (1989). Gender voices. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Greif, Esther B. (1980). Sex differences in parent-child interaction. In Cheris Kramarae (ed.), 253–8.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. F. & Lee, Su Yin (1991). Gender representation in English language textbooks used in the Singapore primary schools. Language and Education, 4 (in press).Google Scholar
Haas, Adelaide (1979). The acquisition of genderlect. In Judith Orasanu, Mariam K. Slater & Leonore Loeb Adler (eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Language, sex and gender, 327, 101–13.Google Scholar
Haas, Adelaide & Sherman, Mark A. (1982). Reported topics of conversation among same-sex adults. Communication Quarterly, 30, 4, 332–42.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary (1944). Men's and women's speech in Koasati. Language, 20, 147–9.Google Scholar
Halaby, R. & Long, D. (1979). Future shout: name calling in the future. Maledicta: The International Journal of Verbal Aggression, 3, 61–8.Google Scholar
HartfordBeverley, S. Beverley, S. (1979). Phonological differences in the English of adolescent Chicanas and Chicanos. In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel M. Crouch (eds), 73–80.Google Scholar
Hartman, Maryann (1979). A descriptive study of the language of men and women born in Maine around 1900. In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel M. Crouch (eds.), 81–90.Google Scholar
Hartman, Pat L. & Judd, Elliot L. (1978). Sexism and TESOL materials. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 383–93.Google Scholar
Hellinger, Marlis (1980). ‘For men must work and women must weep’: sexism in English language text books used in German schools. In Cheris Kramarae (ed.), 267–75.Google Scholar
Henley, Nancy M. & Kramarae, Cheris (1991). Gender, power and miscommunication. In Coupland, Nikolas, Giles, Howard & Wiemann, John W. (eds.), ‘Mis-communication’ and problematic talk, 18–43. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Herbert, Robert K. (1990). Sex-based differences in compliment behaviour. Language in Society, 19, 201–24.Google Scholar
Hiatt, Mary (1977). The way women write. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Alette O. (1986). Mother tongue, father time: a decade of linguistic revolt. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. (1987). Women's speech in modern Mexicano. In Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele & Christine Tanz (eds.), 121–60.Google Scholar
Hiller, U. (1985). Some sex-related differences in the use of spontaneous speech. Linguistic Agency University of Duisburg Papers, Series B, 140.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Lynette (1974). Analysis of supportive and assertive behaviour in conversations. Paper given at meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1984 a). ‘Women's language,: a functional approach. General Linguistics, 24, 3, 149–78.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1984 b). Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: some evidence for hedges as support structures. Te Reo, 27, 47–62.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1985). Sex differences and miscommunication: some data from New Zealand. In Pride, John B. (ed.), Cross-cultural encounters: communication and miscommunication, 24–43. Melbourne: River Seine.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1986). Functions of you know in women and men's speech. Language in Society, 15, 1, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1987). Sex differences and language use in the ESL classroom. In Das, B. K. (ed.), Communication and learning in the classroom community, 5–36. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional English Language Centre.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1988 a). Of course: a pragmatic particle in New Zealand women's and men's speech. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 8, 49–74.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1988 b). Sort of in New Zealand women's and men's speech. Studia Linguistica, 42, 2, 85–121.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1988 c). Sex differences in seminar contributions. BAAL Newsletter, 31, 33–41.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1988 d). Paying compliments: a sex-preferential positive politeness strategy. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 3, 445–65.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1989 a). Stirring up the dust: the importance of sex as a variable in the ESL classroom. Proceedings of the ATESOL 6th Summer School, Sydney, 1, 4–39.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1989 b). Is sex relevant in the ESL classroom? Language Issues, 3, 1, 14–18.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1989 c). Sex differences and apologies: one aspect of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 10, 2, 194–213.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1990). Politeness strategies in New Zealand women's speech. In Bell, Allan & Holmes, Janet (eds.), New Zealand ways of speaking English, 252–76. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, Bell, Allan & Boyce, Mary (1991). Variation and change in New Zealand English: a social dialect investigation. Project Report to the Social Sciences Committee of the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology. Wellington: Victoria University.Google Scholar
Holmquist, Jonathan C. (1985). Social correlates of a linguistic variable: a study in a Spanish village. Language in Society, 14, 2, 191–203.Google Scholar
Holt, Vivienne (1988). How New Zealand newspapers name people. Occasional Papers in Language and Linguistics, 1, 9–18.Google Scholar
Horvath, Barbara (1985). Variation in Australian English: the sociolects of Sydney. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Diana & Casey, Patricia (1986). Pronoun choice for gender-unspecified agent words: developmental differences. Language and Speech, 29, 1, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, C. (1978). Women, taboo and the suppression of attention. In Ardener, S. (ed.) Defining females: the nature of women in society, 89–108. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell (1962). The ethnography of speaking. In Gladwin, T. & Sturtevant, W. C. (eds.), Anthropology and human behaviour, 13–53. Washington, D.C.: Anthropological Society of Washington.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko (1982). Japanese sociolinguistics, politeness and women's language. Lingua, 57, 357–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ide, Sachiko, Hori, Motoko, Kawasaki, Akiko, Ikuta, Shoko & Haga, Hitomi (1986). Sex difference and politeness in Japanese. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 58, 25–36.Google Scholar
Jahangiri, N. & Hudson, Richard A. (1982). Patterns of variation in Tehrani Persian. In Suzanne Romaine (ed), 49–63.Google Scholar
Jaworki, A. (1983). Sexism in textbooks. British Journal of Language Teaching 21, 2.Google Scholar
Jennings, Kay D. & Suwalsky, Joan T. D. (1982). Reciprocity in the dyadic play of three-year-old children. In Loy, John (ed.), The paradoxes of play, 130–140. West Point, NY: Leisure Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto (1922). Language: its nature, development and origin. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Johnson, Janet L. (1980). Questions and role responsibility in four professional meetings. Anthropological Linguistics, 22, 66–76.Google Scholar
Jones, Deborah (1980). Gossip: notes on women's oral culture. In Cheris Kramarae (ed.), 193–6.Google Scholar
Judd, Elliot L. (1983). The problem of applying sociolinguistic findings to TESOL: the case of male/female language. In Wolfson, Nessa & Judd, Elliot (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition, 234–41. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kalçik, Susan (1975). ‘…like Ann's gynaecologist or the time I was almost raped’ – personal narratives in women's rap groups. Journal of American Folklore, 88, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, David A. & Yoels, William C. (1976). The college classroom: some observations on the meanings of student participation. Sociology and Social Research, 60, 421–39.Google Scholar
Keenan, Elinor (1974). Norm-makers, norm-breakers: uses of speech by men and women in a Malagasy community. In Bauman, Richard & Sherzer, Joel (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, 125–43. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kemper, Susan (1984). When to speak like a lady. Sex Roles, 10, 5/6, 435–43.Google Scholar
Kenkel, William F. (1963). Observational studies of husband–wife interaction in family decision-making. In Sussman, Marvin (ed.), Sourcebook in marriage and the family, 144–56. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Carol W. & Camden, Carl T. (1983). A new look at interruptions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 1, 45–58.Google Scholar
Key, Mary Ritchie (1975). Male–female language. Metuchen, New Jersey: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Khosroshahi, Fatemeh (1989). Penguins don't care, but women do: a social identity analysis of a Whorfian problem. Language in Society, 18, 4, 505–25.Google Scholar
Kiper, Pamela S. (1987). Gender and topic. Language in Society, 16, 4, 543–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissling, Elizabeth A. & Kramarae, Cheris (1990). Stranger compliments: the interpretation of street remarks. Women's Studies in Communication (in press).Google Scholar
Klann-Delius, Gisela (1981). Sex and language acquisition. Is there any influence ? Journal of Pragmatics, 5, 1–25.Google Scholar
Koike, Dale A. (1986). Differences and similarities in men's and women's directives in Carioca Brazilian Portuguese. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, Cheris (1975). Sex-related differences in address systems. Anthropological Linguistics, 17, 5, 198–210.Google Scholar
Kramer, Cheris (1977). Perceptions of female and male speech. Language and Speech, 20, 151–61.Google Scholar
Kramer, Cheris (1978). Women's and men's ratings of their own and ideal speech. Communication Quarterly, 26, 2, 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramarae, Cheris (ed.) (1980). The voices and words of women and men. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kramarae, Cheris (1981). Women and men speaking. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kramarae, Cheris (1982). Gender: how she speaks. In Ryan, Ellen Bouchard & Giles, Howard (eds.), Attitudes towards language variation, 84–98. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Kramarae, Cheris (in press). Harassment and everyday life. In Rakow, Lana (ed.), Women making meaning. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Kramarae, Cheris, Schulz, Muriel & O'Barr, William M. (eds) (1984). Language and power. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kuiper, Koenraad (1991). Sporting formulae in New Zealand English; two models of male solidarity. In Cheshire, Jenny (ed.), English around the world: sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972 a). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972 b). Language in the inner city: studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2, 1, 45–80.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin (1975). Language and woman's place. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin (1977). Women's language. Language and Style, 10, 4, 222–48.Google Scholar
Lapadat, Judy & Seesahai, Maureen (1977). Male versus female codes in informal contexts. Sociolinguistics Newsletter, 8, 3, 7–8.Google Scholar
Leet-Pellegrini, Helena M. (1980). Conversational dominance as a function of gender and expertise. In Howard Giles, Peter Robinson & Philip Smith (eds.), 97–104.Google Scholar
Lind, E. Allan & O'Barr, William (1979). The social significance of speech in the courtroom. In Giles, Howard & St Clair, Robert N. (eds.), Language and social psychology, 145–57. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina L. (1989). Social network integration and language change in progress in a rural alpine village. Language in Society, 18, 2, 213–34.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K. (1977). Language, social class and education. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K. (1978). The myth of female superiority in language. Journal of Child Language, 5, 353–63.Google Scholar
MaccobyEleanor, E. Eleanor, E. & Jacklin, Carol N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
MacKay, Donald G. (1980). Language, thought and social attitudes. In Howard Giles, W. Peter Robinson & Philip M. Smith (eds.), 89–96.Google Scholar
MacKay, Donald G. (1982). A reply to Pateman on singular ‘they’. Language in Society, 11, 437–8.Google Scholar
MacKay, Donald G. (1983). Prescriptive grammar and the pronoun problem. In Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae & Nancy Henley (eds.), 38–53.Google Scholar
Maltz, Daniel N. & Borker, Ruth A. (1982). A cultural approach to male–female miscommunication. In Gumperz, John J. (ed.), Langauge and social identity, 196–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally, Borker, Ruth & Furman, Nelly (eds.) (1980). Women and language in literature and society. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
McMillan, Julie R., Clifton, A. Kay, Mcgrath, Diane & Gale, Wanda S. (1977). Women's language: uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality? Sex Roles, 3, 6, 545–59.Google Scholar
Medicine, Bea (1987). The role of American Indian women in cultural continuity and transition. In Joyce Penfield (ed.), 159–66.Google Scholar
Meditch, Andrea (1975). The development of sex-specific speech patterns in young children. Anthropological Linguistics, 17, 421–33.Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. (1984). Whose language: a study in the pragmatics of language use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam (1987). A review of sex and language research in New Zealand. In Anne Pauwels (ed.), 32–44.Google Scholar
MilánWilliam, G. William, G. (1976). The influence of the sex and age factors in the selection of polite expressions: a sample from Puerto Rican Spanish. Bilingual Review, 3, 2, 99–121.Google Scholar
Miller, Casey & Swift, Kate (1976). Words and women. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Miller, Casey & Swift, Kate (1980). The handbook of non-sexist writing. London: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley (1980). Language and social network. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley (1982). Social network and linguistic focusing. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), 141–52.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley (1989). Gender as a speaker variable: the interesting case of the glottalised stops in Tyneside. York Papers in Linguistics, 13, 227–36.Google Scholar
Mulac, Anthony, Wiemann, John M., Widenmann, Sally J. & Gibson, Toni W. (1988). Male/female language differences and effects in same sex and mixed-sex dyads: the genderlinked language effect. Communication Monographs, 55, 4, 315–35.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O. & Covelli, Lucille H. (1988). Women and men speaking at the same time. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 103–11.Google Scholar
Natale, M., Entin, E. & Jaffe, J. (1979). Vocal interruptions in dyadic communication as a function of speech and social anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 865–78.Google Scholar
Newcombe, Nora & Arnkoff, Diane (1979). Effects of speech style and sex of speaker on person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1293–303.Google Scholar
Nichols, Patricia C. (1978). Black women in the rural South: conservative or innovative. In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel M. Crouch (eds.), 45–54.Google Scholar
Nichols, Patricia C. (1983). Linguistic options and choices for black women in the rural South. In Barrie Thome, Cheris Kramarae & Nancy Henley (eds.), 54–68.Google Scholar
Nichols, Patricia C. (1984). Networks and hierarchies: language and social stratification. In Cheris Kramarae, Muriel Schulz & William O'Barr (eds.), 23–42.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Alleen Pace (1972). Sexism in English: a feminist view. In Hoffman, Nancy, Secor, Cynthia & Tinsley, Adrian (eds.), Female Studies VI, 102–9. Old Westbury, NY: Feminist Press.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Alleen Pace (1984). Greetings and salutations in a new age. Language in Society, 13, 245–47.Google Scholar
O'Barr, William M. & Atkins, Bowman K. (1980). ‘Women's language’ or ‘powerless language’? In Sally McConnell- Ginet, Ruth Borker & Nelly Furman (eds.), 93–110.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor (1987). The impact of stratification and socialization on men's and women's speech in Western Samoa. In Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele & Christine Tanz (eds.), 50–70.Google Scholar
Octigan, Mary & Miederman, Sharon (1979). Male dominance in conversations,. Frontiers, 4, 1, 50–4.Google Scholar
Oliver, Marion M. & Rubin, Joan (1975). The use of expletives by some American women. Anthropological Linguistics, 17, 192–7.Google Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola (1981). ‘Yon know’: a discourse-functional approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Trevor (1980). MacKay on singular ‘they’. Language in Society, 9, 349–67.Google Scholar
Pauwels, Anne (1987). Language in transition: a study of the title ‘Ms’ in contemporary Australian society. In Anne Pauwels (ed.), 129–54.Google Scholar
Pauwels, Anne (ed.) (1987). Women and language in Australian and New Zealand society. Sydney: Australian Professional Publications.Google Scholar
Penelope, J. (1986). Heteropatriarchal semantics: just two kinds of people in the world. Lesbian Ethics, 2, 58–80.Google Scholar
Penfield, Joyce (ed.) (1987). Women and language in transition. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Petyt, Keith M. (1985). Dialect and accent in industrial West Yorkshire. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U. (1980). Sex differences and language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, 523–44.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U. (1987). Introduction: the interaction of social and biological processes in women's and men's speech. In Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele & Christine Tanz (eds.), 1–11.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U., Steele, Susan & Tanz, Christine (eds.) (1987). Language, gender and sex in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poynton, Cate (1989). Language and gender: making the difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Preisler, Bent (1986). Linguistic sex roles in conversation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rayfield, J. R. (1976). Maria in Markham Street: Italian immigrants and language learning in Toronto. Ethnic Croups 1, 2, 133–50.Google Scholar
Redlinger, Wendy (1978). Mother's speech to children in bilingual Mexican-American homes. In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel Crouch (eds.), 73–82.Google Scholar
Roger, Derek & Nesshoever, Willfried (1987). Individual differences in dyadic conversational strategies: a further study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 247–55.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne (ed.) (1982). Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, M. & Lamphere, L. (eds.) (1974). Women, culture and society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Joan (1982). Networks and sociolinguistic variation in an African urban setting. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), 141–52.Google Scholar
Sachs, Jacqueline (1975). Cues to identification of sex in children's speech. In Barrie Thome & Nancy Henley (eds.), 152–71.Google Scholar
Sachs, Jacqueline (1987). Preschool boys' and girls' language use in pretend play. In Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele & Christine Tanz (eds.), 178–88.Google Scholar
Safilios-Rothschild, Constantina (1979). Sex role, socialisation and sex discrimination: a synthesis and critique of the literature. Washington D.C.: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian (1975). A quantitative paradigm for the study of communicative competence. In Bauman, Richard & Sherzer, Joel (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, 18–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schatz, Henriette (1986). Plat Amsterdams in its social context. Amsterdam: P. J. Meerten-Institut voor Dialectologie, Volkskunde en Naamkunde.Google Scholar
Schick Case, Susan (1988). Cultural differences, not deficiencies: an analysis of managerial women's language. In Rose, Suzanna & Larwood, Laurie (eds.), Women's careers: pathways and pitfalls, 41–63. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B. (1987). Do different worlds mean different words?: an example from Papua New Guinea. In Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele & Christine Tanz (eds.), 249–60.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. W. & Hacker, S. L. (1973). Sex role imagery and the use of the generic ‘man’ in introductory texts. The American Sociologist, 8, 1, 12–18.Google Scholar
Schulz, Muriel R. (1975). The semantic derogation of woman. In Barrie Thorne & Nancy Henley (eds.), 64–75.Google Scholar
Scott, Kathryn P. (1980). Perceptions of communication competence: what's good for the goose is not good for the gander. In Cheris Kramarae (ed.), 199–208.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Amy (1990). Pickle fights: gendered talk in preschool disputes. Discourse Processes, 13, 5–31.Google Scholar
Sherzer, Joel (1987). A diversity of voices: men's and women's speech in ethnographic perspective. In Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele & Christine Tanz (eds.), 95–120.Google Scholar
Shibamoto, Janet S. (1985). Japanese women's language. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shimanoff, Susan B. (1977). Investigating politeness. In Keenan, Elinor O. & Bennet, Dina (eds.), Discourse across time and space, 213–41. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger W., Wolfram, Walter A. & Riley, William K. (1967). Linguistic correlates of social stratification in Detroit speech. Cooperative Research Project No. 6–1347. Washington D.C.: Office of Education.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip M. (1985). Language, the sexes and society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith-Hefner, Nancy J. (1988). Women and politeness: the Javanese example. Language in Society, 17, 4, 535–54.Google Scholar
Sorensen, A. P. (1972). Multilingualism in the northwest Amazon. In Pride, John B. & Holmes, Janet (eds.), Sociolinguistics, 78–93. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Soskin, William F. & John, Vera P. (1963). The study of spontaneous talk. In Barker, Roger (ed.), The stream of behaviour, 228–87. New York: Appleton-Ccntury-Crofts.Google Scholar
Spender, Dale (1980 a). Man made language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Spender, Dale (1980 b). Talking in class. In Spender, Dale & Sarah, Elizabeth (eds.), Learning to lose, 148–54. London: The Women's Press.Google Scholar
Spender, Dale (1982). Invisible women: the schooling scandal. London: Writers & Readers Publishing Cooperative Society.Google Scholar
Spender, Dale (1984). Defining reality: a powerful tool. In Cheris Kramarae, Muriel Schulz & William M. O'Barr (eds.), 194–205.Google Scholar
Staley, Constance (1978). Male–female use of expletives: a heck of a difference in expectations. Anthropological Linguistics, 20, 367–80.Google Scholar
Steckler, Nicola A. & Cooper, William E. (1980). Sex differences in color naming of unisex apparel. Anthropological Linguistics, 22, 373–81.Google Scholar
Stewart, Lea P. & Ting-Toomey, Stella (1986). Communication, gender and sex roles in diverse interaction context. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. Strodtbeck, Fred L. (1975). Husband–wife interaction over revealed differences. American Sociological Review, 16, 468–73.Google Scholar
Strodtbeck, Fred L. (1975). Husband–wife interaction over revealed differences. American Sociological Review, 16, 468–73.Google Scholar
Strodtbeck, Fred L. and Mann, Richard D. (1956). Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 19, 3–11.Google Scholar
Swacker, Marjorie (1975). The sex of the speaker as a sociolinguistic variable. In Barrie Thorne & Nancy Henley (eds.), 76–83.Google Scholar
Swacker, Marjorie (1979). Women's verbal behaviour at learned and professional conferences. In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel M. Crouch (eds.), 155–60.Google Scholar
Swann, Joan (1988). Talk control: an illustration from the classroom of problems in analysing male dominance in conversation. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 122–40.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1990 a). You just don't understand: women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1990 b). Gender differences in topical coherence. Discourse Processes, 13, 73–90.Google Scholar
Thomas, Beth (1988). Differences of sex and sects: linguistic variation and social networks in a Welsh mining village. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 51–61.Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie & Henley, Nancy (eds.) (1975). Language and sex: difference and dominance. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie, Kramarae, Cheris & Henley, Nancy (eds.) (1983). Language, gender and society. Massachusetts: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Todd, Alexandra D. & Fisher, Sue (eds.) (1988). Gender and discourse: the power of talk. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1, 2, 179–95.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter (1974 a). Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter (1974 b). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter (1983). On dialect. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vetterling-Braggin, Mary (ed.) (1981). Sexist language. Totowa, N.J.: Littlefield, Adams.Google Scholar
Walters, J. (1981). Variation in requesting behaviour of bilingual children. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 27, 77–92.Google Scholar
West, Candace (1990). Not just doctors' orders: directive Interaction, 7, 1, 87–106.Google Scholar
West, Candace (1990). Not just ‘doctors’ orders: directive response sequences in patients' visits to women and men physicians. Discourse and Society, 1, 1, 85–112.Google Scholar
West, Candace & Zimmerman, Don H. (1983). Small insults: a study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae & Nancy Henley (ed.), 102–17.Google Scholar
West, Candace & Zimmerman, Don H. (1985). Gender, language, and discourse. In T. A. Van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of discourse analysis. 4. Discourse analysis of society, 103–24.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth (1981). Women relate, men report: sex differences in language behaviour in a therapeutic group. Journal of Pragmatics, 5, 261–85.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa (1984). Pretty is as pretty does. Applied Linguistics, 5, 3, 236–44.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa & Manes, Joan (1980). Don't ‘Dear’ me! In Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker & Nelly Furman (eds.), 79–92.Google Scholar
Woods, Nicola (1988). Talking shop: sex and status as determinants of floor apportionment in a work setting. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 141–57.Google Scholar
Wright, John W. & Hosman, Lawrence A. (1983). Language style and sex bias in the courtroom: the effects of male and female use of hedges and intensifiers on impression information. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 48, 137–52.Google Scholar
Zentella, Ann C. (1987). Language and female identity in the Puerto Rican community. In Joyce Penfield (ed.), 167–79.Google Scholar
Zimin, Susan (1981). Sex and politeness: factors in first- and second-language use. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 27, 35–58.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H. & West, Candace (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In Barrie Thorne & Nancy Henley (eds.), 105–29.Google Scholar