Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T14:18:42.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hi, thanks, and goodbye: More routine information*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Esther Blank Greif  and
Jean Berko Gleason
Esther Blank Greif
Affiliation:
Boston University
Jean Berko Gleason
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines children's acquisition of three politeness routines: hi, thanks, and goodbye. Twenty-two children, eleven boys and eleven girls, and their parents participated. At the end of a parent-child play session, an assistant entered the playroom with a gift to elicit routines from the children. Spontaneous production of the three routines was low, with thank you the most infrequent. Parents actively prompted their children to produce routines, however, and children usually complied. Further, parents themselves used the routines, with more mothers than fathers saying thank you and goodbye to the assistant. Results were discussed in relation to the role of parents in linguistic socialization and to the importance of routines in social interaction. (Routines; politeness formulas; linguistic socialization; parental teaching; mother-father differences; sex role socialization)

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , August 1980 , pp. 159 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, E. (1977). Young children's knowledge of role-related speech differences: A mommy is not a daddy is not a baby. Stanford University, Papers and Reports in Child Language Development, 13:83–90.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1976). The structure and use of politeness formulas. Language in Society 5:137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, J. Berko, & Weintraub, S. (1976). The acquisition of routines in child language. Language in Society 5:129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar
Haas, A. (1979). Male and female spoken language differences: Stereotypes and evidence. Psychological Bulletin 86:616–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, M. E. (Ed.) (1976). The role of the father in child development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Morris, D. (1967). The naked ape. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
Mussen, P. H., Conger, J. J., & Kagan, J. (1974). Child development and personality. (4th ed.) New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar