Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-pmsz9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T04:08:40.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing levels of endangerment in the Catalogue of Endangered Languages (ELCat) using the Language Endangerment Index (LEI)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2016

Nala Huiying Lee  and
John Van Way
Nala Huiying Lee
Affiliation:
National University of SingaporeDepartment of English Language and LiteratureFaculty of Arts & Social SciencesBlk AS5, 7 Arts Link, Singapore 117570nala.lee@gmail.com
John Van Way
Affiliation:
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoajvanway@hawaii.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Catalogue of Endangered Languages (ELCat) is the central feature of the Google-powered Endangered Languages Project (endangeredlanguages.com), which is a venue for sharing information and resources on the world's endangered languages and the knowledge contained in them. One key feature of ELCat is a quantitative measure that can be used to understand the level of endangerment of any language. Quantitative measurements are needed to compare language vitality across a variety of contexts around the globe, and can be used as a parallel to measurements of other forms of threats to biocultural diversity. This article addresses the development of the Language Endangerment Index (LEI). Based on four factors (intergenerational transmission, absolute number of speakers, speaker number trends, and domains of use), this index is different from other methods of assessment in several ways, especially as it can be used even if limited information is available. (Language endangerment, vitality, intergenerational transmission, speaker numbers, domains of language use)*

Information

Type
Discussion
Information
Language in Society , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 271 - 292
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Aragon, Carolina (2013). Phonetic realization of medial stop consonants in Akuntsú. Working Papers in Linguistics 44(1):1–14. Mānoa: University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.Google Scholar
Basu, Arabinda (1991). Small tribal populations: Observed patterns of fertility and mortality. In Saraswati, Baidyanath (ed.), Tribal thought and culture: Essays in honour of Surajit Chandra Sinha, 169–82. New Delhi: Ashok Kumar Mittal Concept.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert (2003). Thao dictionary. Taipei: Academica Sinica, Institute of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Brenzinger, Matthias (2011). The twelve modern Khoisan languages. In Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena & Ernszt, Martina (eds.), Khoisan languages and linguistics: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium. July 6–10, 2008, Riezlern/Kleinwalsertal, 1–32. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Caffery, Josephine (2010). Central Australian endangered languages: So what? Dialogue (Academy of Social Sciences in Australia) 29:78–86.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle; Lee, Nala Huiying; Okura, Eve; Simpson, Sean; Ueki, Kaori; & Van Way, John (2013). New knowledge: Findings from the Catalogue of Endangered Languages (ELCat). Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Language Documentation and Conservation. February 28–March 3, 2013, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.Google Scholar
Crevels, Miy (2012). Language endangerment in South America: The clock is ticking. In Campbell, Lyle & Grondona, Veronica (eds.), The indigenous languages of South America: A comprehensive guide, 176–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Crystal, David (2000). Language death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dwyer, Arienne M. (2011). Tools and techniques for endangered-language assessment and revitalization: Vitality and viability of minority languages. Proceedings of the Trace Foundation Lecture Series, October 23–24, 2009, New York. Online: https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/dspace/bitstream/1808/7109/1/Dwyer2011_AssessRevitalize.pdf.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas (2010). Dying words: Endangered languages and what they have to tell us. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fenelon, James V., & Hall, Thomas D. (2008). Revitalization and indigenous resistance to globalization and neoliberalism. American Behavioral Scientist 51:1867–901.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua (1965). Who speaks what language to whom and when? La Linguistique 1(2):67–88.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua (1987). Language spread and language policy for endangered languages. In Peter H. Lowenburg, Proceedings of the Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics, 1–15. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua (1991). Reversing language shift. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Golla, Victor; Goddard, Ives; Campbell, Lyle; Mithun, Marianne; & Mixco, Maurico (2008). North America. In Asher, Ronald E. & Moseley, Christopher (eds.), Atlas of the world's languages, 2nd edn, 7–41. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gorenflo, Larry J.; Romaine, Suzanne; Mittermeier;, Russell A. & Walker-Painemilla, Kristen (2012). Co-occurrence of linguistic and biological diversity in biodiversity hotspots and high biodiversity wilderness areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109(21):8032–37.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth (1992). Language endangerment and the human value of linguistic diversity. Language 68:35–42.Google Scholar
Hara, Kiyoshi (2005). Regional dialect and cultural development in Japan and Europe. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 175/176:193–211.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin (2012). Should linguistic diversity be conserved like biodiversity? Online: http://dlc.hypotheses.org/195; accessed December 2014.Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne (2011). Language revitalization and language pedagogy: New teaching and learning strategies. Language and Education. Special Issue: ‘Applied linguist needed’: Cross-disciplinary networking for revitalization and education in endangered language contexts 25:307–18.Google Scholar
Inafuku, Seiki (ed.) (1992). Igaku Okinawago Jiten [A medical dictionary of Okinawan]. Ginowan: Roman Shobō Honten.Google Scholar
India, Office of the Registrar General & Census Comissioner (2001). Census of India. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs.Google Scholar
Krauss, Michael (2007). Classification and terminology for degrees of language endangerment. In Brenzinger, Matthias (ed.), Language Diversity Endangered, 1–8. Berlin Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian (1999). Documentation of endangered languages: A priority task for linguistics. ASSIDUE 1: Arbeitspapiere des Seminars fur Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt, 1–15. Erfurt: Universität Erfurt.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, & Simons, Gary F. (2010). Assessing endangerment: Expanding Fishman's GIDS. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 55(2):103–20.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul; Simons, Gary F.; & Fennig, Charles D. (eds.) (2013). Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 17th edn.Dallas, TX: SIL International. Online: http://www.ethnologue.com.Google Scholar
Maffi, Luisa (2005). Linguistic, cultural, and biological diversity. Annual Review of Anthropology 34(1):599–617.Google Scholar
Moseley, Christopher (ed.) (2010). Atlas of the world's languages in danger. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. Online: http://www.unesco.org/culture/languages-atlas/en/atlasmap.html.Google Scholar
Read, Zachary (2011). Number of speakers of Central Okinawan: A guide to Okinawan, JLect. Online: http://www.jlect.com/downloads/Number-of-Central-Okinawan-Speakers.pdf.Google Scholar
Shashi, Shyam Singh (1994). Encyclopedia of Indian tribes. New Delhi: Anmol.Google Scholar
Singh, N. Iqbal (1978). The Andaman story. New Delhi: Vikas.Google Scholar
Sutherland, William J. (2003). Parallel extinction risk and global distribution of languages and species. Nature 423:276–79.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku (2005). Language endangerment and language revitalization: An introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tyron, Darrell (2007). The languages of the Pacific region: The Austronesian languages of Oceania. In Brenzinger, Matthias (ed.), Language diversity endangered, 391–409. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
UNESCO ad hoc expert group on endangered languages (Matthias Brenzinger, Arienne M. Dwyer, Tjeerd de Graaf, Collette Grinevald, Michael Krauss, Osahito Miyaoka, Nicholas Ostler, Osamu Sakiyama, María E. Villalón, Akira Y. Yamamoto, Ofelia Zapeda) (2003). Language vitality and endangerment. Document submitted to the International Expert Meeting on UNESCO Programme Safeguarding of Endangered Languages, Paris, 10–12 March 2003. Online: http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/doc/src/00120-EN.pdf.Google Scholar
Weninger, Stefan (2004). Ge'ez (Classical Ethiopic). Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Wurm, Stephen A. (2007). Australia and the Pacific. In Moseley, Christopher (ed.), Encyclopedia of the world's endangered languages, 424–557. London: Routledge.Google Scholar