 $p$-divisible groups, and random curves over finite fields
$p$-divisible groups, and random curves over finite fieldsPublished online by Cambridge University Press: 13 February 2013
We describe a probability distribution on isomorphism classes of principally quasi-polarized  $p$-divisible groups over a finite field
$p$-divisible groups over a finite field  $k$ of characteristic
$k$ of characteristic  $p$ which can reasonably be thought of as a ‘uniform distribution’, and we compute the distribution of various statistics (
$p$ which can reasonably be thought of as a ‘uniform distribution’, and we compute the distribution of various statistics ( $p$-corank,
$p$-corank,  $a$-number, etc.) of
$a$-number, etc.) of  $p$-divisible groups drawn from this distribution. It is then natural to ask to what extent the
$p$-divisible groups drawn from this distribution. It is then natural to ask to what extent the  $p$-divisible groups attached to a randomly chosen hyperelliptic curve (respectively, curve; respectively, abelian variety) over
$p$-divisible groups attached to a randomly chosen hyperelliptic curve (respectively, curve; respectively, abelian variety) over  $k$ are uniformly distributed in this sense. This heuristic is analogous to conjectures of Cohen–Lenstra type for
$k$ are uniformly distributed in this sense. This heuristic is analogous to conjectures of Cohen–Lenstra type for  $\text{char~} k\not = p$, in which case the random
$\text{char~} k\not = p$, in which case the random  $p$-divisible group is defined by a random matrix recording the action of Frobenius. Extensive numerical investigation reveals some cases of agreement with the heuristic and some interesting discrepancies. For example, plane curves over
$p$-divisible group is defined by a random matrix recording the action of Frobenius. Extensive numerical investigation reveals some cases of agreement with the heuristic and some interesting discrepancies. For example, plane curves over  ${\mathbf{F} }_{3} $ appear substantially less likely to be ordinary than hyperelliptic curves over
${\mathbf{F} }_{3} $ appear substantially less likely to be ordinary than hyperelliptic curves over  ${\mathbf{F} }_{3} $.
${\mathbf{F} }_{3} $.
 $p$-rank strata of the moduli space of curves, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN  15 (2008), Art. ID rnn053, 25; MR 2438069 (2009i:14030).Google Scholar
$p$-rank strata of the moduli space of curves, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN  15 (2008), Art. ID rnn053, 25; MR 2438069 (2009i:14030).Google Scholar $p$-rank strata of the moduli space of hyperelliptic curves, Adv. Math. (2011).Google Scholar
$p$-rank strata of the moduli space of hyperelliptic curves, Adv. Math. (2011).Google Scholar $p$-divisible groups, and random curves over finite fields’, Available at  http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/~dzb/. (Also attached at the end of the tex file).Google Scholar
$p$-divisible groups, and random curves over finite fields’, Available at  http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/~dzb/. (Also attached at the end of the tex file).Google Scholar $p$-divisible groups, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Volume 302 (Springer, Berlin,  1972), MR 0344261 (49 #9000).Google Scholar
$p$-divisible groups, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Volume 302 (Springer, Berlin,  1972), MR 0344261 (49 #9000).Google Scholar $p$-torsion of abelian varieties in characteristic
$p$-torsion of abelian varieties in characteristic  $p$, in Computational arithmetic geometry, Contemp. Math., Volume 463,  pp. 121–129 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI,  2008), MR 2459994 (2009m:11085).Google Scholar
$p$, in Computational arithmetic geometry, Contemp. Math., Volume 463,  pp. 121–129 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI,  2008), MR 2459994 (2009m:11085).Google Scholar $p\gt 2$, J. Algebra  52 (2) (1978), 378–410, MR 0491717 (58 #10920).Google Scholar
$p\gt 2$, J. Algebra  52 (2) (1978), 378–410, MR 0491717 (58 #10920).Google Scholar