Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T01:40:20.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Basic logic: reflection, symmetry, visibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Giovanni Sambin ,
Giulia Battilotti  and
Claudia Faggian
Giovanni Sambin
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Matematica Pura Ed Applicata, Università di Padova, Via Belzoni 7, I-35131 Padova, Italy E-mail: sambin@math.unipd.it
Giulia Battilotti
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Matematica Pura Ed Applicata, Università di Padova, Via Belzoni 7, I-35131 Padova, Italy E-mail: giulia@math.unipd.it
Claudia Faggian
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Matematica Pura Ed Applicata, Università di Padova, Via Belzoni 7, I-35131 Padova, Italy E-mail: claudia@math.unipd.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We introduce a sequent calculus B for a new logic, named basic logic. The aim of basic logic is to find a structure in the space of logics. Classical, intuitionistic. quantum and non-modal linear logics, are all obtained as extensions in a uniform way and in a single framework. We isolate three properties, which characterize B positively: reflection, symmetry and visibility.

A logical constant obeys to the principle of reflection if it is characterized semantically by an equation binding it with a metalinguistic link between assertions, and if its syntactic inference rules are obtained by solving that equation. All connectives of basic logic satisfy reflection.

To the control of weakening and contraction of linear logic, basic logic adds a strict control of contexts, by requiring that all active formulae in all rules are isolated, that is visible. From visibility, cut-elimination follows. The full, geometric symmetry of basic logic induces known symmetries of its extensions, and adds a symmetry among them, producing the structure of a cube.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 979 - 1013
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Battilotti, G., Logica di base attraverso il principio di reflessione, Ph.D. thesis, Università di Siena, February 1997, advisor: G. Sambin, Italian.Google Scholar
[2]Battilotti, G., An asymmetric sequent calculus for linear intuitionistic logic, submitted, 1998.Google Scholar
[3]Battilotti, G., Embedding classical logic into basic orthologic with a primitive modality, Logic Journal of the IGPL, vol. 6 (1998), no. 3, pp. 383–402, special issue on generalized sequent systems (Wansin, H., ed.).Google Scholar
[4]Battilotti, G. and Faggian, C., Quantum logic and the cube of logics, Handbook of philosophical logic (Gabbay, D. and Guentner, F., editors), vol. VII, Kluwer, new ed., 1998.Google Scholar
[5]Battilotti, G. and Sambin, G., Basic logic and the cube of its extensions, Logic in Florence '95, Proceedings of LMPS, Florence 1995 (Cantini, A., Casari, E., and Minari, P., editors), Kluwer, to appear.Google Scholar
[6]Battilotti, G. and Sambin, G., A uniform presentation of sup-lattices, quantales and frames by means of infinitary pre-ordered sets, pretopologies and formal topologies, Preprint number 19, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Padova, November 1993.Google Scholar
[7]Bell, J. L., Letter to G. Sambin, March 1994.Google Scholar
[8]Belnap, N. D., Display logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 11 (1982), pp. 375–417, reprinted with minor changes as section 62 of A. R. Anderson, N. D. Belnap, and J. M. Dunn, Entailment: the logic of relevance and necessity, vol. 2, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Brouwer, L. E. J., Over de groundslagen der wiskuude, Thesis, 1907, Dutch.Google Scholar
[10]de Bruijn, N. G., Type-theoretical checking and the philosophy of mathematics, Twenty-five years of constructive type theory (Sambin, G. and Smith, J., editors), Oxford Logic Guides, vol. 36, Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 41–56.Google Scholar
[11]Došen, K., Logical constants as punctuation marks, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 30 (1989), no. 3, pp. 362–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Došen, K., Logical consequence: a turn in style, Logic and scientific methods (Chiara, M. L. Dallaet al., editors), Kluwer, 1997, pp. 289–311.Google Scholar
[13]Dummett, M., Elements of intuitionism, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1977.Google Scholar
[14]Faggian, C., Teorema di eliminazione del taglio in basic logic e nelle logiche quantistiche, Tesi di laurea in matematica, Università di Padova, July 1996, Italian.Google Scholar
[15]Faggian, C., Classical proofs via basic logic, Proceedings of CSL '97, Aarhus (Nielsen, M. and Thomas, W., editors), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1414, Springer-Verlag, 1997, pp. 203–219.Google Scholar
[16]Faggian, C. and Sambin, G., From basic logic to quantum logics with cut elimination, Proceedings of the international quantum structures association Berlin '96, special issue of International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 31 (1998), pp. 31–37.Google Scholar
[17]Faggian, C. and Sambin, G., A unified approach to logical calculi and normalization of proofs, Lecture notes of the 11th summer school in logic, language and information (SSLLI), Utrecht University, 1999.Google Scholar
[18]Gabbay, D. M., Labelled deductive systems, vol. 1, Oxford Logic Guides, no. 33, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Gentzen, G., Untersuchungen über das logische Schliessen, Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 39 (1935), pp. 176–210, English translation in The collected papers of Gerhard Gentzen, (M. E. Szabo, editor), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969, pp. 68–131.Google Scholar
[20]Girard, J., Linear logic, Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 50 (1987), pp. 1–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Girard, J., Proof theory and logical complexity, Bibliopolis, Naples, 1987.Google Scholar
[22]Girard, J.-Y., On the unity of logic, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 59 (1993), pp. 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Goré, R., A uniform display system for intuitionistic and dual intuitionistic logic, Technical report, Australian National University, April 1995.Google Scholar
[24]Martin-Löf, P., On the meanings of the logical constants and the justifications of the logical laws, Atti degli incontri di logica matematica (Bernardi, C. and Pagli, P., editors), vol. 2, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Siena, 1983, pp. 203–281, reprinted in Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 1 (1996), pp. 11–60.Google Scholar
[25]Martin-Löf, P., “Intuitionistic type theory”, notes by Giovanni Sambin of a series of lectures given in Padua, June 1980, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 1984.Google Scholar
[26]Sambin, G., Per una dinamica nei fondamenti (Italian), Atti del congresso “Nuovi problemi della logica e delta filosofia delta scienza”, Viareggio, 8–13 gennaio 1990 (Corsi, G. and Sambin, G., editors), vol. 2, CLUEB, Bologna, 1991, pp. 163–210.Google Scholar
[27]Sambin, G., A new and elementary method to represent every complete boolean algebra, Logic and algebra (Ursini, A. and Aglianò, P., editors), Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996, pp. 655–665.Google Scholar
[28]Takeuti, G., Proof theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975.Google Scholar