Hostname: page-component-65b85459fc-k6zl8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-19T04:44:48.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AN NIP-LIKE NOTION IN ABSTRACT ELEMENTARY CLASSES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2025

WENTAO YANG*
Affiliation:
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES INNER MONGOLIA UNIVERSITY HOHHOT, 010031 INNER MONGOLIA CHINA URL: http://wen-tao-y.github.io

Abstract

This article is a contribution to the “neostability” type of result for abstract elementary classes. Under certain set theoretic assumptions, we propose a definition and a characterization of NIP in AECs. The class of AECs with NIP properly contains the class of stable AECs.1 We show that for an AEC K and $\lambda \geq LS(K)$, $K_\lambda $ is NIP if and only if there is a notion of nonforking on it which we call a w*-good frame. On the other hand, the negation of NIP leads to being able to encode subsets.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Symbolic Logic

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baldwin, J. T., Categoricity , University Lecture Series, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 2009.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. T., Eklof, P. C., and Trlifaj, J., ${N}^{\perp }$ as an abstract elementary class. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic , vol. 149 (2007), no. 1, pp. 2539.Google Scholar
Boney, W. and Grossberg, R., Forking in short and tame abstract elementary classes . Annals of Pure and Applied Logic , vol. 168 (2017), no. 8, pp. 15171551.Google Scholar
Boney, W., Grossberg, R., Kolesnikov, A., and Vasey, S., Canonical forking in AECs . Annals of Pure and Applied Logic , vol. 167 (2016), no. 7, pp. 590613.Google Scholar
Devlin, K. J. and Shelah, S., A weak version of $\diamondsuit$ which follows from ${2}^{{\mathrm{\aleph}}_0}<{2}^{{\mathrm{\aleph}}_1}$ . Israel Journal of Mathematics , vol. 29 (1978), nos. 2–3, pp. 239247. Paper number 65 in Shelah’s publication list. MR 0469756Google Scholar
Grossberg, R., Classification theory for abstract elementary classes , Logic and Algebra (Zhang, Y. editor), Contemporary Mathematics, 302, AMS, 2002, pp. 165203.Google Scholar
Grossberg, R. and Shelah, S., On Hanf numbers of the infinitary order property, preprint, 1980. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9809196.Google Scholar
Grossberg, R. and Shelah, S., A nonstructure theorem for an infinitary theory which has the unsuperstability property . Illinois Journal of Mathematics , vol. 30 (1986), no. 2, pp. 364390. Paper number 238 in Shelah’s publication list. MR 840135.Google Scholar
Grossberg, R. and VanDieren, M., Categoricity from one successor cardinal in tame abstract elementary classes . Journal of Mathematical Logic , vol. 6 (2006), no. 2, pp. 181201.Google Scholar
Grossberg, R. and Vasey, S., Equivalent definitions of superstability in tame abstract elementary classes . The Journal of Symbolic Logic , vol. 82 (2017), no. 4, pp. 13871408.Google Scholar
Jarden, A. and Shelah, S., Non-forking frames in abstract elementary classes . Annals of Pure and Applied Logic , vol. 164 (2013), no. 3, pp. 135191. Paper number 875 in Shelah’s publication list. MR 3001542Google Scholar
Jerome Keisler, H., Six classes of theories . Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , vol. 21 (1976), no. 3, pp. 257266.Google Scholar
Lessmann, O., Upward categoricity from a successor cardinal for tame abstract classes with amalgamation . The Journal of Symbolic Logic , vol. 70 (2005), no. 2, pp. 639660.Google Scholar
Leung, S., Stability results assuming tameness, monster model and continuity of nonsplitting . The Journal of Symbolic Logic , vol. 89 (2023), no. 1, p. 383425.Google Scholar
Mazari-Armida, M., Non-forking w-good frames . Archive for Mathematical Logic , vol. 59 (2020), no. 1, pp. 3156.Google Scholar
Mazari-Armida, M. and Rosicky, J., Relative injective modules, superstability and noetherian categories. Journal of Mathematical Logic , 2023, to appear. Preprint available from https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219061324500272.Google Scholar
Shelah, S., Stability, the f.c.p., and superstability; model theoretic properties of formulas in first order theory . Annals of Mathematical Logic , vol. 3 (1971), no. 3, pp. 271362. Paper number 10 in Shelah’s publication list. MR 0317926Google Scholar
Shelah, S., The number of non-isomorphic models of an unstable first-order theory . Israel Journal of Mathematics , vol. 9 (1971), pp. 473487. Paper number 12 in Shelah’s publication list. MR 0278926.Google Scholar
Shelah, S., Categoricity in ${\mathrm{\aleph}}_1$ of sentences in ${L}_{\omega_1,\omega }(Q)$ . Israel Journal of Mathematics , vol. 20 (1975), no. 2, pp. 127148. Paper number 48 in Shelah’s publication list. MR 0379177.Google Scholar
Shelah, S., Classification Theory and the Number of Non-Isomorphic Models , Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 92, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1978.Google Scholar
Shelah, S., Classification of nonelementary classes. II. Abstract elementary classes , Classification Theory (Chicago, IL, 1985) , (John T. Baldwin editor), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1292, Springer, Berlin, 1987. Paper number 88 in Shelah’s publication list, pp. 419497. MR 1033034Google Scholar
Shelah, S., Categoricity for abstract classes with amalgamation . Annals of Pure and Applied Logic , vol. 98 (1999), nos. 1–3, pp. 261294. Paper number 394 in Shelah’s publication list. MR 1696853Google Scholar
Shelah, S., Categoricity of an abstract elementary class in two successive cardinals . Israel Journal of Mathematics , vol. 126 (2001), pp. 29128. Paper number 576 in Shelah’s publication list. MR 1882033Google Scholar
Shelah, S., Categoricity in abstract elementary classes: Going up inductively. 2009. Paper number 600 in Shelah’s publication list, Ch. II of [26. 27].Google Scholar
Shelah, S., Categoricity of an abstract elementary class in two successive cardinals. revisited, 2009, Ch. VI of [26. 27].Google Scholar
Shelah, S., Classification Theory for Abstract Elementary Classes , Studies in Logic: Mathematical Logic and Foundations, 18, College Publications, London, 2009.Google Scholar
Shelah, S., Classification Theory for Abstract Elementary Classes 2 , Studies in Logic: Mathematical Logic and Foundations, 20, College Publications, London, 2009.Google Scholar
Vasey, S., Building independence relations in abstract elementary classes . Annals of Pure and Applied Logic , vol. 167 (2016), no. 11, pp. 10291092.Google Scholar
Vasey, S., Forking and superstability in tame AECs . The Journal of Symbolic Logic , vol. 81 (2016), no. 1, pp. 357383.Google Scholar
Vasey, S., Infinitary stability theory . Archive for Mathematical Logic , vol. 55 (2016), pp. 567592.Google Scholar
Vasey, S., Quasiminimal abstract elementary classes . Archive for Mathematical Logic , vol. 57 (2018), pp. 299315.Google Scholar
Vasey, S., Accessible categories, set theory, and model theory: An invitation, preprint, 2020, https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.11307.Google Scholar
Zilber, B., A categoricity theorem for quasi-minimal excellent classes , Logic and its Applications (Blass, A. and Zhang, Y., editors),American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 2005, pp. 297306.Google Scholar