Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-d7bbv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T06:39:07.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Passive Acoustic Positioning Algorithm Based on Virtual Long Baseline Matrix Window

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2018

Tao Zhang Open the ORCID record for Tao Zhang [Opens in a new window] ,
Ziqiang Wang ,
Yao Li  and
Jinwu Tong
Tao Zhang*
Affiliation:
(Southeast University, Nanjing, School of Instrument Science and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Micro-Inertial Instrument and Advanced Navigation Technology of Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210096, China)
Ziqiang Wang
Affiliation:
(Southeast University, Nanjing, School of Instrument Science and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Micro-Inertial Instrument and Advanced Navigation Technology of Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210096, China)
Yao Li
Affiliation:
(Southeast University, Nanjing, School of Instrument Science and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Micro-Inertial Instrument and Advanced Navigation Technology of Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210096, China)
Jinwu Tong
Affiliation:
(Southeast University, Nanjing, School of Instrument Science and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Micro-Inertial Instrument and Advanced Navigation Technology of Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210096, China)
*
(E-mail: 101011356@seu.edu.cn)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new acoustic positioning method for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV) that uses a single underwater hydrophone is proposed in this paper to solve problems of Long Baseline (LBL) array laying and communication synchronisation problems among all hydrophones in the traditional method. The proposed system comprises a Strapdown Inertial Navigation System (SINS), a single hydrophone installed at the bottom of the AUV and a single underwater sound source that emits signals periodically. A matrix of several virtual hydrophones is formed with the movement of the AUV. In every virtual LBL window, the time difference from the transmitted sound source to each virtual hydrophone is obtained by means of a Smooth Coherent Transformation (SCOT) weighting cross-correlation in the frequency domain. Then, the recent location of the AUV can be calculated. Simulation results indicate that the proposed method can effectively compensate for the position error of SINS. Thus, the positioning accuracy can be confined to 2 m, and the method achieves good applicability. Compared with traditional underwater acoustic positioning systems, the proposed method can provide great convenience in engineering implementation and can reduce costs.

Keywords

Single sound source positioningInertial navigation systemVirtual LBL matrix windowCOT weighting cross-correlation in frequency domain

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 193 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

An, L., Chen, L. J. and Fang, S. L. (2013). Investigation on Correlation Peaks Ambiguity and Ambiguity Elimination Algorithm in Underwater Acoustic Passive Localization. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 35(12), 2948–2953.Google Scholar
Barisic, M., Miskovic, N. and Vasilijevic, A. (2012). Fusing Hydroacoustic Absolute Position Fixes With AUV On-Board Dead Reckoning. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 45(22), 211–217.Google Scholar
Casalino, A. T. G., Simetti, E., Sperindè, A. and Torelli, S. (2014). Impact of LBL Calibration on the Accuracy of Underwater Localization. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 47(3), 3376–3381.Google Scholar
Choi, Y. H., Lee, J. W., Hong, S. H., Suh, J. H. and Kim, J. G. (2015). The development of the modular autonomous underwater navigation system based on OPRoS. International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence. IEEE, 625–628.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. (1998). The generalization of the Wiener-Khinchin theorem. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 5(11), 292–294.Google Scholar
Deng, A. D., Bao, Y. Q. and Zhao, L. (2009). Research on Time Delay Estimation Algorithm Based on Generalized Cross Correlation in Acoustic Emission Source Location. Proceedings of the CSEE, 29(14), 86–92.Google Scholar
Donovan, G. T. (2012). Position Error Correction for an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Inertial Navigation System (INS) Using a Particle Filter. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 37(3), 431–445.Google Scholar
Ferreira, B., Matos, A. and Cruz, N. (2010). Estimation approach for AUV navigation using a single acoustic beacon. Sea Technology, 51(12), 54–59.Google Scholar
Ji, C. L., Zhang, N., Wang, H. H. and Zheng, C. E. (2014). Application of Kalman Filter in AUV Acoustic Navigation. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 525, 695–701.Google Scholar
Ji, D. X., Song, W., Zhao, H. Y. and Liu, J. (2016). Deep Sea AUV Navigation Using Multiple Acoustic Beacons. China Ocean Engineering (English Edition), 30(2), 309–318.Google Scholar
Jiao, X. T., Li, J. C. and Men, L. J. (2013). Accuracy Analysis of Two TDOA Algorithms in Passive Underwater Acoustic Positioning. Audio Engineering, 37(1), 73–75.Google Scholar
Lee, P. M., Huan, J. B., Choi, H. T. and Hong, S. W. (2005). An integrated navigation systems for underwater vehicles based on inertial sensors and pseudo LBL acoustic transponders. Oceans. Washington, DC, USA, IEEE, 1, 555–562.Google Scholar
Mahdinejad, K. and Seghaleh, M. Z. (2013). Implementation of time delay estimation using different weighted generalized cross correlation in room acoustic environments. Life Science Journal, 10(6S), 846–851.Google Scholar
Maki, T., Matsuda, T., Sakamaki, T., Ura, T. and Kojima, J. (2013). Navigation Method for Underwater Vehicles Based on Mutual Acoustical Positioning With a Single Seafloor Station. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 38(1), 167–177.Google Scholar
Michael, B. P. (2011). The BELLHOP Manual and User's Guide: PRELIMINARY DRAFT. Heat, Light, and Sound Research, Inc.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A., Farrell, J. A., Zhao, Y. Y. and Djapic, V. (2010). Autonomous underwater vehicle navigation. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 35(3), 663–678.Google Scholar
Morgado, M., Batista, P., Oliveira, P. and Silvestre, V. (2010). Position USBL/DVL sensor-based navigation filter in the presence of unknown ocean currents. Automatica, 47(12), 2604–2614.Google Scholar
Ngatini, , Apriliani, E. and Nurhadi, H. (2016). Ensemble and Fuzzy Kalman Filter for Position Estimation of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Based on Dynamical System of AUV Motion. Expert Systems with Applications, 68, 29–35.Google Scholar
Paull, L., Saeedim S., Seto, M. and Li, H. (2014). AUV Navigation and Localization: A Review. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 39(1), 131–149.Google Scholar
Yu, P. and Wu, B. (2015). The optimal design of long baseline acoustic positioning array. Ship Electronic Engineering, 35(5), 125–129.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. C., Han, Y. F., Zheng, C. and Sun, D. (2016a). Underwater target localization using long baseline positioning system. Applied Acoustics, 111, 129–134.Google Scholar
Zhang, T., Chen, L. P. and Li, Y. (2015). AUV Underwater Positioning Algorithm Based on Interactive Assistance of SINS and LBL. Sensors, 16(1), 42–64.Google Scholar
Zhang, T., Shi, H. F., Chen, L. P., Li, Y. and Tong, J. W. (2016b). AUV Positioning Method Based on Tightly Coupled SINS/LBL for Underwater Acoustic Multipath Propagation. Sensors, 16(3), 357–373.Google Scholar
Zhang, T., Xu, X., Li, Y. and Gong, S. P. (2013). AUV fault tolerant navigation technology based on ins and underwater acoustic assistance system. Chinese Journal of Inertial Technology, 21(4), 512–516.Google Scholar
Zhong, S., Xia, W. and He, Z. S. (2015). Multipath Time Delay Estimation Based on Gibbs Sampling under Incoherent Reception Environment. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications & Computer Sciences, E98.A(6), 1300–1304.Google Scholar