Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-v2cwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-04T01:11:12.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stokes flow of incompressible liquid through a conical diffuser with partial slip boundary condition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2025

Peter Lebedev-Stepanov*
Affiliation:
Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography, Kurchatov Complex of Crystallography and Photonics of NRC ‘Kurchatov Institute’, Leninskii prospekt 59, Moscow 119333, Russia
*
Corresponding author: Peter Lebedev-Stepanov, petrls@yandex.ru

Abstract

For the first time, an analytical solution has been derived for Stokes flow through a conical diffuser under the condition of partial slip. Recurrent relations are obtained that allow determination of the velocity, pressure and stream function for a certain slip length λ. The solution is analysed in the first order of decomposition with respect to a small dimensionless parameter ${\lambda }/{r}$. It is shown that the sliding of the liquid over the surface of the cone leads to a vorticity of the flow. At zero slip length, we obtain the well-known solution to the problem of a diffuser with a no-slip boundary condition corresponding to strictly radial streamlines. To solve that problem, we use an alternative form of the general solution of the linearised, stationary, axisymmetric Navier–Stokes equations for an incompressible fluid in spherical coordinates. A previously published solution to this problem, dating back to the paper by Sampson (1891 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, vol. 182, pp. 449–518), is given in terms of a stream function that leads to formulae that are difficult to apply in practice. By contrast, the new general solution is derived in the vector potential representation and is simpler to apply.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arfken, G.B., Weber, H.-J. & Harris, F.E. 2012 Mathematical Methods for Physicists: A Comprehensive Guide. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G.K. 2000 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511800955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehnke, U.C., Remmler, T., Motschmann, H., Wurlitzer, S., Hauwede, J. & Fischer, M.Th 1999 Partial air wetting on solvophobic surfaces in polar liquids. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 211 (2), 243251.10.1006/jcis.1998.5987CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boinovich, L.B. & Emelyanenko, A.M. 2008 Hydrophobic materials and coatings: principles of design, properties and applications. Russ. Chem. Rev. 77 (7), 583600.10.1070/RC2008v077n07ABEH003775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, W.N. 1925 Viscous flow through wide-angled cones. Philos. Mag. 50 (6), 10581066.10.1080/14786442508628550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, H.T. 1962 The Summation of Series. Principia Press of Trinity University.Google Scholar
Dubov, A.L., Nizkaya, T.V., Asmolov, E.S. & Vinogradova, O.I. 2018 Boundary conditions at the gas sectors of superhydrophobic grooves. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 014002.10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.014002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberman, W.L. & Sayre, R.M. 1958 Motion of rigid and fluid spheres in stationary and moving liquids inside cylindrical tubes. David Taylor Model Basin. Hydromechanics laboratory research and development report No. 1143, Washington, D.C. 10.21236/AD0206307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Happel, J. & Brenner, H. 1983 Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics with Special Applications to Particulate Media. Springer.10.1007/978-94-009-8352-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, W.J. 1920 The pressure in a viscous liquid moving through a channel with diverging boundaries. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 19 (6), 307312.Google Scholar
Landau, L.D. & Lifshitz, E.M. 1987 Fluid Mechanics. Course of Theoretical Physics, vol. 6. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Lauga, E., Brenner, M.P. & Stone, H.A. 2007 Microfluidics: the no-slip boundary condition. In Handbook of Experimental Fluid Dynamics (ed. J. Foss, C. Tropea & A.L. Yarin). Springer.Google Scholar
Lauga, E. & Stone, H.A. 2003 Effective slip in pressure-driven Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 489, 5577.10.1017/S0022112003004695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, P. & Spencer, D.E. 1971 Field Theory Handbook Including Coordinate Systems, Differential Equations and Their Solutions, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Neto, C., Evans, D.R., Bonaccurso, E., Butt, H.-J. & Craig, V.S.J. 2005 Boundary slip in Newtonian liquids: a review of experimental studies. Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 28592897.10.1088/0034-4885/68/12/R05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, J.P. 2010 Slip on superhydrophobic surfaces. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 89109.10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R.A. 1891 On stokess current function. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A 182, 449518.Google Scholar
Savic, P. 1953, Rept. No. MT-22, Nat. Res. Council Canada (Ottawa).Google Scholar
Simpson, J.T., Hunter, S.R. & Aytug, T. 2015 Superhydrophobic materials and coatings: a review. Rep. Progr. Phys. 78 (8), 086501.10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086501CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slezkin, N.A. 1955 Dynamics of a viscous incompressible liquid [in Russian. Gostekhizdat. Google Scholar
Vinogradova, O.I. 1995 Drainage of a thin liquid film confined between hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 11, 22132220.10.1021/la00006a059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinogradova, O.I. 1999 Slippage of water over hydrophobic surfaces. Intl J. Miner. Process. 56, 3160.10.1016/S0301-7516(98)00041-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Lebedev-Stepanov supplementary material

Lebedev-Stepanov supplementary material
Download Lebedev-Stepanov supplementary material(File)
File 880.9 KB