Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-2pp2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T19:52:06.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who, why, when, and how: a development study*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Helen S. Cairns  and
Jennifer Ryan Hsu
Helen S. Cairns
Affiliation:
Queens College and City University of New York
Jennifer Ryan Hsu
Affiliation:
City University of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fifty children between the ages of 3; 0 and 5; 6 were asked six types of wh- questions following videotaped sequences. It is argued that differential difficulty of various forms of who questions supports a parallel model of information retrieval and processing during discourse. The differential difficulty of why and when questions are, however, attributable to a necessary progression in the ability to encode the relevant concepts linguistically. Responses to how questions are difficult because they involve a number of unrelated skills.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , October 1978 , pp. 477 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Clark, E. (1971). On the acquisition of the meaning of ‘before’ and ‘after’. JVLVB 10. 266–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. L. (1968). Experimental design in psychological research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1970). Discourse agreement: how children answer questions. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tyack, D. & Ingram, D. (1977). Children's production and comprehension of questions. JChLang 4. 211–24.Google Scholar