Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T23:42:42.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two-year-old phonology: impact of input, motor and cognitive abilities on development*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2009

BARBARA DODD  and
BETH McINTOSH
BARBARA DODD*
Affiliation:
Queensland University Centre for Clinical Research
BETH McINTOSH
Affiliation:
Queensland University Centre for Clinical Research
*
Address for correspondence: Queensland University Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, 4029, Queensland, Australia. e-mail: bdodd@somc.uq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous research has rarely compared the contributions of different underlying abilities to phonological acquisition. In this study, the auditory-visual speech perception, oro-motor and rule abstraction skills of 62 typically developing two-year olds were assessed and contrasted with the accuracy of their spoken phonology. Measures included auditory-visual speech perception, production of isolated and sequenced oro-motor movements, and verbal and non-verbal rule abstraction. Abilities in all three domains contributed to phonological acquisition. However, the use of atypical phonological rules was associated with lower levels of phonological accuracy and a linear regression indicated that this measure of rule abstraction had greater explanatory power than the measures of input processing and output skill.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , November 2010 , pp. 1027 - 1046
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

[*]

We thank the children, parents and childcare centres who participated in the study. Dr Peter O'Rourke's advice on statistical analyses is gratefully acknowledged. The research was supported by the Australian Research Council.

References

REFERENCES

Adams, A-M. & Gathercole, S. (1995). Phonological working memory and speech production in preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38, 403–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banich, M. (2009). Executive function: The search for an integrated account. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, B. & Stemberger, J. (1998). Handbook of phonological development from the perspective of constraint-based nonlinear phonology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bland-Stewart, L. (2003). Phonetic inventories and phonological patterns of African-American children. Communication Disorders Quarterly 24, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broselow, E. (2009). Consraints in phonological acquisition (Review). Language 85, 214–20.Google Scholar
Burnham, D. & Dodd, B. (2004). Auditory-visual speech integration by prelinguistic infants: Perception of an emergent consonant in the McGurk effect. Developmental Psychobiology 45: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnham, D., Earnshaw, L. & Clark, J. (1991). Development of categorical identification of native and non-native bilabial stops: infants, children and adults. Journal of Child Language 18, 231–60.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. (2000). Children's language. Consensus and controversy. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Crosbie, S., Holm, A. & Dodd, B. (in press). Cognitive flexibility in children with and without speech disorder. Child Language Teaching and Therapy.Google Scholar
Curtin, S. & Werker, J. F. (2007). The perceptual foundation of phonological development. In Gaskell, M. G., Altman, G., Bloom, P., Caramazza, A. & Levelt, P. (eds), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, 579–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Desjardins, R., Rogers, J. & Werker, J. (1997). An exploration of why preschoolers perform differently than do adults in audiovisual perception tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 66, 85–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, B. (1995). Children's acquisition of phonology. In Dodd, B. (ed.), Differential diagnosis and treatment of children with speech disorder, 21–48. London: Whurr.Google Scholar
Dodd, B. & Crosbie, S. (in press). Language and cognition: Evidence from disordered language. In Goswami, U. (ed.), Handbook of childhood cognitive development, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dodd, B. & Gillon, G. (1997). The nature of the phonological deficit underlying disorders of spoken and written language. In Leong, C. and Joshi, R. (eds), Cross-language studies of learning to read and spell, 53–70. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Dodd, B. & McIntosh, B. (2008). The input processing, cognitive linguistic and oro-motor skills of children with speech difficulty. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 10, 169–78.Google Scholar
Dodd, B., McIntosh, B., Erdener, D. & Burnham, D. (2008). Perception of the auditory-visual illusion in speech perception by children with phonological disorders. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 22, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, B., McIntosh, B., Leahy, M. & Murphy, N. (in press). Atypical speech in Irish children: Identification and differential diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Speech & Language Studies.Google Scholar
Dodd, B., Zhu, H., Crosbie, S., Holm, A. & Ozanne, A. (2002). Diagnostic evaluation of articulation and phonology. London: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Duggirala, V. & Dodd, B. (1991). A psycholinguistic assessment model for disordered phonology. In Congress for Phonetic Sciences, 342–45. Aix-en-Provence: Universite de Provence.Google Scholar
Dyson, A. (1988). Phonetic inventories of 2-year old children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 53, 89–93.Google Scholar
Elbro, C. (1993). Dyslexic reading strategies and lexical access. In Joshi, R. and Leong, C. (eds), Reading disabilities: diagnoses and component processes, 185–98. London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Evans, J., Saffran, J. & Robe-Torres, K. (2009). Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 52, 321–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, C. & Farwell, C. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language 51, 39–49.Google Scholar
Grech, H. & Dodd, B. (in press). Phonological acquisition in Malta: A bilingual language learning context. International Journal of Bilingualism.Google Scholar
Green, J., Moore, C. & Reilly, K. (2002). The sequential development of jaw and lip control for speech. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 45, 66–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holm, A. & Dodd, B. (1999). A longitudinal study of the phonological development of two Cantonese–English bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics 20, 349–76.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1976). Phonological disability in children. London: Cole and Whurr.Google Scholar
Jacques, S. & Zelazo, P. D. (2005). Language and the development of cognitive flexibility: Implications for theory of mind. In Astington, J. W. & Baird, J. A. (eds), Why language matters for theory of mind, 144–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. (1992). Developing phonological categories from the speech signal. In Ferguson, C., Menn, L. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (eds), Phonological development: models, research, implications, 17–64. Timonium: York Press.Google Scholar
Kager, R., Pater, J. & Zonneveld, W. (2004). Constraints in phonological acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, C. (2008). Substitution errors in the production of word-initial and word-final clusters. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 51, 35–48.Google Scholar
Lof, G. (2002). Two comments on this assessment series. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11, 255–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGurk, H. & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264 (5588), 746–48.Google Scholar
McIntosh, B. & Dodd, B. (2008). Two-year-olds' phonological acquisition: normative data. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 10(6), 460–69.Google Scholar
McLeod, S. & Bleile, K. (2003). Neurological and developmental foundations of speech acquisition. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention. Chicago, November.Google Scholar
McLeod, S., van Dorn, J. & Reed, V. (2001). Consonant cluster development in two-year-olds. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 44, 1144–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, C., Chappell, T. & Ellis, A. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A(3), 528–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (1995). Why the child holded the baby rabbits: A case study in language acquisition. In Gleitman, L. & Liberman, M. (eds), An invitation to cognitive science, 2nd edn. 345–82. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Redington, M. & Chater, N. (1998). Connectionist and statistical approaches to language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes 13, 129–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, A. & Buckley, E. (2005). On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules. Language Learning and Language Development 1(3–4), 289–316.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1973). The acquisition of phonology: A case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
So, L. & Dodd, B. (2007). Phonological awareness abilities of Cantonese-speaking children with phonological disorder. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech Language and Hearing 10, 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stampe, D. (1979). A dissertation on natural phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. (1987). Phonological skills of two-year-olds. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 18, 323–29.Google Scholar
Thyer, N., Hickson, L. & Dodd, B. (2000). The perceptual magnet effect in Australian-English vowels. Perception and Psychophysics 62, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velleman, S. & Vihman, M. (2002). Whole-word phonology and templates. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 33, 9–23.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. (2007). Early word forms. Fifth Congress of the Linguistic Association of Brazil, Belo Horizonte, 28 January–3 March, 2007 [www.abralin.org/abralin2007/instituto/cursos/material/vihman63.pdf. Last accessed 27 January, 2008].Google Scholar
Vihman, M. & Velleman, S. (1989). Phonological reorganization: A case study. Language and Speech 32, 149–70.Google Scholar
Vogel Sosa, A. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (2006). Patterns of intra-word phonological variability during the second year of life. Journal of Child Language 33, 31–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, M. & Scukanec, G. (1997). Profiling the phonological abilities of two-year-olds: a longitudinal investigation. Child Language, Teaching and Therapy 13, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, H. & Dodd, B. (2000). The phonological acquisition of Putonghua (Modern Standard Chinese). Journal of Child Language 27, 3–42.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, I., Steiner, V. & Pond, R. (2002). Preschool Language Scale, 4th edn.San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar