Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-tbj44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T21:54:50.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on indirect objects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

V. J. Cook
V. J. Cook
Affiliation:
North East London Polytechnic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , October 1976 , pp. 435 - 437
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Carrow, M. A. (1968). The development of auditory comprehension of language structure in children. JSpHDis 33. 99–111.Google ScholarPubMed
Cook, V. J. (1974). Is explanatory adequacy adequate? Linguistics 133. 21–31.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. F. (1975). An experimental investigation of a putative linguistic universal: marking and the indirect object. JExpChPsych 20. 73–80.Google Scholar
Fraser, C., Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production. JVLVB 2. 121–35.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J. (1972). Cognitive basis of language learning in infants. PsychRev 79. 1–13.Google Scholar
McNeill, D., Yukawa, R. & McNeill, N. B. (1971). The acquisition of direct and indirect objects in Japanese. ChDev 42. 237–49.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 38.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. (1973). Theoretical implications of word order, topicalization and inflections in German language acquisition. In Ferguson, C. & Slobin, D. (eds), Studies of language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Stayton, B. (1972). The acquisition of direct and indirect objects in English. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Waryas, C. & Stremel, K. (1974). On the preferred form of the double object construction. JPsycholingRes 3. 271–80.Google Scholar