Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T16:35:10.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developmental changes in children's comprehension and explanation of spatial metaphors for time*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2012

LAUREN J. STITES  and
ŞEYDA ÖZÇALIŞKAN
LAUREN J. STITES
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
ŞEYDA ÖZÇALIŞKAN
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Time is frequently expressed with spatial motion, using one of three different metaphor types: moving-time, moving-ego, and sequence-as-position. Previous work shows that children can understand and explain moving-time metaphors by age five (Özçalışkan, 2005). In this study, we focus on all three metaphor types for time, and ask whether metaphor type has an effect on children's metaphor comprehension and explanation abilities. Analysis of the responses of three- to six-year-old children and adults showed that comprehension and explanation of all three metaphor types emerge at an early age. Moreover, children's metaphor comprehension and explanation vary by metaphor type: children perform better in understanding and explaining metaphors that structure time in relation to the observer of time (moving-ego, moving-time) than metaphors that structure time without any relation to the observer of time (sequence-as-position-on-a-path). Our findings suggest that children's bodily experiences might play a role in their developing understanding of the abstract concept of time.

Information

Type
Brief Research Reports
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 40 , Issue 5 , November 2013 , pp. 1123 - 1137
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence 149, 91–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asch, S. E. & Nerlove, H. (1960). The development of double function terms in children. In Kaplan, B. and Wapner, S. (eds), Perspectives in psychological theory: Essays in honor of Heinz Werner, 47–60. New York: International Universities Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59, 617–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Billow, R. M. (1981). Observing spontaneous metaphor in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 31, 430–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boroditsky, L. & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science 13, 185–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casasanto, D., Fotakopoulou, O. & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Space and time in the child's mind: Evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry. Cognitive Science 34, 387–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, V. (2004). The structure of time: Language, meaning, and temporal cognition. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamin Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2008). Rethinking metaphor. In Gibbs, R. W. (ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1275662.Google Scholar
Gardner, H., Winner, E., Bechhofer, R. & Wolf, D. (1978). The development of figurative language. In Nelson, K. (ed.), Children's language, vol. I, 1–38. New York: Gardner Prep, Inc.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift. Child Development 59(1), 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., Imai, M. & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes 17, 537–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9(3), 558–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Happé, F. G. E (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition 48, 101–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Happé, F. G. E (1995). Understanding minds and metaphors: Insights from the study of figurative language in autism. Metaphor and Symbol 10(4), 175–95.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, S. (2009). A cognitive grammar account of time motion ‘metaphors’: A view from Japanese. Cognitive Linguistics 20, 341–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, F. (1986). Conceptual domains and the acquisition of metaphor. Cognitive Development 1, 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, E. & Lehrer, A. (1981). Semantic fields and the structure of metaphor. Studies in Language 5, 31–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lee, R. F. & Kamhi, A. G. (1990). Metaphoric competence in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 23, 476–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandler, J. M. (1999). Preverbal representation and language. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M. A., Nadel, L. & Garrett, M. F. (eds), Language and space, 365–84. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martin, I. & McDonald, S. (2004). An exploration of the causes of non-literal language problems in individuals with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34(3), 311–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendelsohn, E., Robinson, S., Gardner, H. & Winner, E. (1984). Are preschoolers' renamings intentional category violations? Developmental Psychology 20(2), 187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K. & Macrae, N. (2010). Moving through time. Psychological Science 21, 222–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, K. E. (2000). Spatial experience and temporal metaphors in Wolof: Point of view, conceptual mapping, and linguistic practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Moore, K. E. (2006). Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics 17, 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. (2003). Metaphorical motion in crosslinguistic perspective: A comparison of English and Turkish. Metaphor and Symbol 18, 189–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş (2004). Time can't fly, but a bird can: Learning to think and talk about time as spatial motion in English and in Turkish. European Journal of English Studies 8(3), 309–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. (2005). On learning to draw the distinction between physical and metaphorical motion: Is metaphor an early emerging cognitive and linguistic capacity? Journal of Child Language 32(2), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Özçalışkan, Ş. (2007). Metaphors we move by: Children's developing understanding of metaphorical motion in typologically distinct languages. Metaphor and Symbol 22, 147–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. (2010). Acquisition of metaphor. In Hogan, P. (ed.), Cambridge encyclopedia of language sciences, 486–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., Goldin-Meadow, S., Gentner, D. & Mylander, C. (2009). Does language about similarity foster similarity comparisons in children? Cognition 112(2), 217–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. (1973). The child and reality: Problems of genetic psychology. New York: Grossman Publishers.Google Scholar
Schnell, Z. (2007). Metaphor processing and the acquisition of idioms: A mentalistic model. Acta Lingistica Hungarica 54(1), 73–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waggoner, J. E. & Palermo, D. S. (1989). Betty is a bouncing bubble: Children's comprehension of emotion-descriptive metaphors. Developmental Psychology 25, 152–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welman, H. (1990). The child's theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winner, E. (1979). New names for old things. Journal of Child Language 6, 469–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winner, E., Rosenstiel, A. & Gardner, H. (1976). The development of metaphoric understanding. Developmental Psychology 12, 289–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar