Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T19:27:55.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The production effect in memory: a prominent mnemonic in children*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2014

MICHAL ICHT  and
YANIV MAMA
MICHAL ICHT*
Affiliation:
Ariel University
YANIV MAMA
Affiliation:
Ariel University
*
* Address for Correspondence: Michal Icht, Department of Communication Disorders, Ariel University 40700, ISRAEL. tel: +972-3-9765755; fax: +972-3-9765743; e-mail: lmichal@ariel.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ‘Production Effect’ (PE) refers to a memory advantage for items studied aloud over items studied silently. Thus, vocalizing may serve as a mnemonic that can be used to assist learners in improving their memory for new concepts. Although many other types of mnemonic have been suggested in the literature, the PE seems especially appropriate for young children, as it does not involve literacy skills. The present study is a first investigation of the PE in children. In two experiments we tested five-year-olds in a PE paradigm using pictures of objects as stimuli. In Experiment 1, pictures of familiar objects were presented to be remembered, and in Experiment 2 we used pictures of unfamiliar objects (evaluating new vocabulary acquisition). In both experiments we showed a memory advantage for vocally produced words (‘look and say’) over other types of learning (‘look’, ‘look and listen’), suggesting the PE as a prominent memory and learning tool.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 42 , Issue 5 , September 2015 , pp. 1102 - 1124
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E. & Pickering, S. J. (2006). Verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory in children: Are they separable? Child Development 77, 1698–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R. C. & Nagy, W. E. (1992). The vocabulary conundrum. American Educator, 16(4) 14–18, 44–7.Google Scholar
Aureli, D. (2012). The keyword method: a study of vocabulary acquisition in fifth grade. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rowan University.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N. & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14, 575–89.Google Scholar
Bat-El, O. (2009). Harmonic domains and synchronization in typically and atypically developing Hebrew-speaking children. Language Sciences 31, 117–35.Google Scholar
Bauer, R. H. (1979). Memory, acquisition, and category clustering in learning-disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 27, 365–83.Google Scholar
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G. & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Biemiller, A. & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology 93(3), 498–520.Google Scholar
Biran, M. & Friedmann, N. (2005). From phonological paraphasias to the structure of the phonological output lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 20, 589–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodner, G. E., Taikh, A. & Fawcett, J. M. (2014). Assessing the costs and benefits of production in recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21, 149–54.Google Scholar
Bourne, L. E., Dominowski, R. L., Loftus, E. F. & Healy, A. F. (1986). Cognitive processes, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bowman, B., Donovan, S. & Burns, M. S. (2000). Eager to learn: educating our preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Bowman, M. (1981). The effects of story structure questioning upon reading comprehension. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Camarata, S. M., Nelson, K. E. & Camarata, M. N. (1994). Comparison of conversational-recasting and imitative procedures for training grammatical structures in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 37(6), 1414–23.Google Scholar
Castel, A. D., Rhodes, M. G. & Friedman, M. C. (2013). Predicting memory benefits in the production effect: the use and misuse of self-generated distinctive cues when making judgments of learning. Memory and Cognition 41, 28–35.Google Scholar
Coady, J. (1997). L2 vocabulary acquisition through extensive reading. In Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (eds), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 225–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conroy, P. & Collins, P. (2012) Mnemonic devices for braille instruction, Insight 5(1), 47–52.Google Scholar
Conway, M. A. & Gathercole, S. E. (1987). Modality and longterm memory. Journal of Memory & Language 26, 341–61.Google Scholar
Coyne, M. D., Simmons, D. C., Kame'enui, E. J. & Stoolmiller, M. (2004). Teaching vocabulary during shared storybook readings: an examination of differential effects. Exceptionality 12(3), 145–62.Google Scholar
Dunst, C. J., Herter, S. & Shields, H. (2000). Interest-based natural learning opportunities. Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series No. 2: Natural Environments and Inclusion 37–48.Google Scholar
Fawcett, J. M. (2013). The production effect benefits performance in between-subject designs: a meta-analysis. Acta Psycologica 142, 1–5.Google Scholar
Fawcett, J. M., Quinlan, C. K. & Taylor, T. L. (2012). Interplay of the production and picture superiority effects: a signal detection analysis. Memory 20(7), 655–66.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H., Beach, D. R. & Chinsky, J. M. (1966). Spontaneous verbal rehearsal in a memory task as a function of age. Child Development 37, 283–99.Google Scholar
Flood, J. (1977). Parental styles in reading episodes with young children. Reading Teacher 30, 864–7.Google Scholar
Forrin, N. D., MacLeod, C. M. & Ozubko, J. D. (2012). Widening the boundaries of the production effect. Memory and Cognition 40(7), 1046–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, R. & Plaut, D. C. (2005). The word-frequency database for printed Hebrew, online <http://word-freq.mscc.huji.ac.il/index.htm> (last accessed 3 June 2013).+(last+accessed+3+June+2013).>Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. (1998). The development of memory. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 39(1), 3–27.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. & Conway, M. A. (1988). Exploring long-term modality effects: vocalization leads to best retention. Memory & Cognition 16(2), 110–9.Google Scholar
Gordon, C. & Braun, C. (1982). Story schemata: metatextual aid to reading and writing. In Niles, J. & Harris, L. (eds), New inquiries in reading research and instruction (Thirty-first Yearbook of the National Reading Conference) (pp. 262–268). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.Google Scholar
Hart, B. & Risley, R. T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1980). The functions and uses of literacy. Journal of Communication 30, 123–33.Google Scholar
Hochberg, J. & Brooks, V. (1962). Pictorial recognition as an unlearned ability in a study of one child's performance. American Journal of Psychology 75, 624–8.Google Scholar
Hopkins, R. H. & Edwards, R. E. (1972). Pronunciation effects in recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11, 534–7.Google Scholar
Hourihan, K. L. & MacLeod, C. M. (2008). Directed forgetting meets the production effect: distinctive processing is resistant to intentional forgetting. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale 62, 242–6.Google Scholar
Hulme, C., Thomson, N., Muir, C. & Lawrence, A. (1984). Speech rate and the development of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 38, 241–53.Google Scholar
Icht, M., Mama, Y. & Algom, D. (2014) The production effect in memory: multiple species of distinctiveness. Frontiers in Psychology 5, 886.Google Scholar
Kleinheksel, K. A. & Summy, S. E. (2003). Enhancing student learning and social behavior through mnemonic strategies. Teaching Exceptional Children 36(2), 30–5.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B., Schwartz, R. G., Folger, M. K., Newhoff, M. & Wilcox, M. J. (1979). Children's imitations of lexical items. Child Development 50(1), 19–27.Google Scholar
Lin, O. Y. H. & MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Aging and the production effect: a test of the distinctiveness account. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 66(3), 212–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowe, P. A., Mayfield, J. W. & Reynolds, C. R. (2003). Gender differences in memory test performance among children and adolescents, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 18(8), 865–78.Google Scholar
MacDonald, P. A. & MacLeod, C. M. (1998). The influence of attention at encoding on direct and indirect remembering. Acta Psychologica 98, 291–310.Google Scholar
MacLeod, C. M. (2011). I said, you said: the production effect gets personal. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 18, 1197–202.Google Scholar
MacLeod, C. M., Gopie, N., Hourihan, K. L., Neary, K. R. & Ozubko, J. D. (2010). The production effect: delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36(3), 671–85.Google Scholar
Mama, Y. & Icht, M. (in press). Auditioning the production effect: learning by the auditory modality reveals the superiority of writing over vocalizing. Memory.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. J. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meara, P. (1995). The importance of an early emphasis on L2 vocabulary. Language Teacher 19(2), 8–10.Google Scholar
Morrow, L. M. (1985). Retelling stories: a strategy for improving children's comprehension, concept of story structure and oral language complexity. Elementary School Journal 85, 647–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, L. M. (1987). Promoting voluntary reading: the effects of an inner city program in summer day care centers. Reading Teacher 41, 266–74.Google Scholar
Morrow, L. M. (1988). Young children's responses to one-to-one readings in school settings. Reading Research Quarterly 23, 89–107.Google Scholar
Morrow, L. M., O'Connor, E. M. & Smith, J. K. (1990). Effects of a story reading program on the literacy development of at-risk kindergarten children. Journal of Literacy Research 22, 255–75.Google Scholar
Nation, P. & Newton, J. (1997). Teaching vocabulary. In Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (eds), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 238–254). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, B. (2002). A review of research into vocabulary learning and acquisition, online <http://www.kushiro-ct.ac.jp/library/kiyo/kiyo36/Brian.pdf> (last accessed 6 October 2014).+(last+accessed+6+October+2014).>Google Scholar
Ninio, A. & Bruner, J. (1978). The achievement and antecedents of labeling. Journal of Child Language 5, 1–15.Google Scholar
Odom, S. L., Favazza, P. C., Brown, W. H. & Horn, E. M. (2000). Approaches to understanding the ecology of early environments for children with disabilities. In Thompson, T., Felce, D. & Symons, F. (eds), Behavioral observation: technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 193–214). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. L. & Scarcella, R. C. (1994). Second language vocabulary learning among adults: state of the art in vocabulary instruction. System 22(2), 231–43.Google Scholar
Ozubko, J. D., Gopie, N. & MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Production benefits both recollection and familiarity. Memory and Cognition 40, 326–38.Google Scholar
Ozubko, J. D., Hourihan, K. L. & MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Production benefits learning: the production effect endures and improves memory for text, Memory 20(7), 717–27.Google Scholar
Ozubko, J. D. & MacLeod, C. M. (2010). The production effect in memory: evidence that distinctiveness underlies the benefit. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1543–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paribakht, T. S & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (eds), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 174–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, M. & Myers, N. A. (1979). Development of recall in two- and four-year-old children. Developmental Psychology 15, 73–83.Google Scholar
Phillips, B. M., Clancy-Menchetti, J. & Lonigan, C. J. (2008). Successful phonological awareness instruction with preschool children lessons from the classroom. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 28(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
Pressley, M. (2001). The nature of first-grade instruction that promotes literacy achievement. In Pressley, M., Allington, R. L., Wharton-McDonald, R., Block, C. & Morrow, L. (eds), Learning to read: lessons from exemplary first-grade classrooms, 48–69. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Putnam, A. L., Ozubko, J. D., MacLeod, C. M. & Roediger, H. L. III (2014). The production effect in paired-associate learning: benefits for item and associative information. Memory and Cognition 42, 409–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richler, J. J., Palmeri, T. J. & Gauthier, I. (2013). How does using object names influence visual recognition memory? Journal of Memory and Language 68(1), 10–25.Google Scholar
Roser, N. & Martinez, M. (1985). Roles adults play in preschoolers’ response to literature. Language Arts 62, 485–90.Google Scholar
Rosin, D. & Yakir, P. (2000). Pictures for Examining Articulation and Naming of Hebrew-speaking Children in Israel. Israel: Rehovot.Google Scholar
Sameroff, A. J. & Fiese, B. H. (2000). Transactional regulation: the developmental ecology of early intervention. In Shonkoff, J. P. & Meisels, S. J. (eds), Handbook of early childhood intervention, 2nd ed. (pp. 135–159). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, R. G. & Leonard, L. B. (1985). Lexical imitation and acquisition in language-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 50(2), 141–9.Google Scholar
Schweickert, R. & Boruff, B. (1986). Short-term memory capacity: magic number or magic spell? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 12, 419–25.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S. & Griffin, P. (eds) (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Spiegel, D. & Whaley, J. (1980). Elevating comprehension skills by sensitizing students to structural aspects of narratives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J. K. (1977). The role of nonspecific factors in the task performance of learning disabled children: a theoretical assessment. Journal of Learning Disabilities 10(1), 27–34.Google Scholar
Uberti, H. Z., Scruggs, T. E. & Mastropieri, M. A. (2003). Keywords make the difference! Mnemonic instruction in inclusive classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children 35(3), 56–61.Google Scholar
Weismer, S. E. & Murray-Branch, J. (1989). Modeling versus modeling plus evoked production training: a comparison of two language intervention methods. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 54(2), 269–81.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M. (1988). The early development of memory strategies. In Weinert, F. E. & Perlmutter, M. (eds), Memory development: universal changes and individual differences (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Woodworth, R. S. & Schlosberg, H. S. (1954). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, C. B. (1994). Self-selected reading and interactive vocabulary instruction: knowledge and perceptions of word learning among L2 learners. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar