Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-8cpv7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T14:43:34.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SIBLING CONFLICTS IN FULL- AND HALF-SIBLING HOUSEHOLDS IN THE UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2016

Antti O. Tanskanen ,
Mirkka Danielsbacka ,
Markus Jokela  and
Anna Rotkirch
Antti O. Tanskanen*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Research, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Mirkka Danielsbacka
Affiliation:
Department of Social Research, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Markus Jokela
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Anna Rotkirch
Affiliation:
Population Research Institute, Väestöliitto – Finnish Family Federation, Helsinki, Finland
*
1 Corresponding author. Email: antti.tanskanen@utu.fi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Sibling relations are by nature ambivalent with high levels of both altruistic helping and competition. Higher relatedness is often assumed to reduce the occurrence of conflicts between siblings, but evidence of this has been scarce and mixed. Siblings typically compete over resources and parental attention, and parental constellations vary with sibship types. Since full-siblings compete over the same two biological parents, while half-siblings have only one shared biological parent and often a higher number of parents overall, it is hypothesized that conflicts are more common between full- than half-siblings. This study tested this assumption using the British Millennium Cohort Study (n=7527 children at age 11). Conflicts were measured as children’s reports of how much siblings picked on and hurt each other. Households with full-siblings only, maternal half-siblings only, and both full- and maternal half-siblings were compared. The results show that children who were living with only their full-siblings were more likely to experience sibling conflicts compared with children living with their maternal half-siblings only. This was the case also after controlling for several potentially confounding variables. The results suggest that differential access to parental resources of available biological and step-parents may explain the higher amount of sibling conflict between full- compared with maternal half-siblings.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 31 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, K. G. (2011) Stepparenting, divorce, and investment in children. In Salmon, C. A. & Shackelford, T. K. (eds) The Oxford Handbook on Evolutionary Family Psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 97–112.Google Scholar
Brody, G. H. (1996) Sibling Relationships: Their Causes and Consequences. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood.Google Scholar
Brody, G. H., Stoneman, Z., MacKinnon, C. E. & MacKinnon, R. (1985) Role relationships and behaviors between preschool-aged and school-aged sibling pairs. Developmental Psychology 21, 124–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buist, K. L., Deković, M. & Prinzie, P. (2013) Sibling relationship quality and psychopathology of children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 33, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campione-Barr, N. & Smetana, J. G. (2010) ‘Who said you could wear my sweater?’ Adolescent siblings’ conflicts and association with relationship quality. Child Development 81, 464–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapais, B. (2008) Primeval Kinship: How Pair-Bonding Gave Birth to Human Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapple, S. (2009) Child Well-Being and Sole-Parent Family Structure in the OECD. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Cicirelli, V. G. (1995) Sibling Relationships Across the Life Span. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coall, D. A., Hilbrand, S. & Hertwig, R. (2014) Predictors of grandparental investment decisions in contemporary Europe: biological relatedness and beyond. PLoS One 9, e84082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connelly, R., Joshi, H. & Rosenberg, R. (2014) Family structure. In Platt, L. (ed.) Millennium Cohort Study: Age 11 Survey Initial Findings. Centre for Longitudinal Studies, London.Google Scholar
Copeland, W. E., Wolke, D., Lereya, S. T., Shanahan, L., Worthman, C. & Costello, E. J. (2014) Childhood bullying involvement predicts low-grade systemic inflammation into adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 111, 7570–7575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daly, M. & Wilson, M. I. (1988) Homicide. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google ScholarPubMed
Damian, R. I. & Roberts, B. W. (2015) The associations of birth order with personality and intelligence in a representative sample of U.S. high school students. Journal of Research in Personality 58, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deater-Deckard, K., Dunn, J. & Lussier, G. (2002) Sibling relationships and social-emotional adjustment in different family contexts. Social Development 11, 571–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. & Kendrick, C. (1982) Siblings: Love, Envy and Understanding. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euler, H. A. (2011) Grandparents and extended kin. In Salmon, C. A. & Shackelford, T. K. (eds) The Oxford Handbook on Evolutionary Family Psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 181–210.Google Scholar
Ganong, L. H. & Coleman, M. (1993) An exploratory study of stepsibling subsystems. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 19, 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, K. (ed.) (2014) Millennium Cohort Study: A Guide to the Datasets, (Eighth Edition). Centre for Longitudinal Studies, London.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. G. & Sherman, P. W. (1982) The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. American Zoologist 22, 491–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. & Trillmich, F. (2008) Sibling competition and cooperation in mammals: challenges, developments and prospects. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jankowiak, W. & Diderich, M. (2000) Sibling solidarity in a polygamous community in the USA: unpacking inclusive fitness. Evolution and Human Behavior 21, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J., Rasbash, J., Leckie, G., Gass, K. & Dunn, J. (2012) The role of maternal factors in sibling relationship quality: a multilevel study of multiple dyads per family. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 53, 622–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreyenfeld, M. & Martin, V. (2011) Introduction to the special issue on ‘The dynamics of stepfamilies in cross-national perspective’. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung (Journal of Family Research) 23, 124–127.Google Scholar
Lawson, D. W. & Mace, R. (2009) Trade-offs in modern parenting: a longitudinal study of sibling competition for parental care. Evolution and Human Behavior 30, 170–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X. (2009) Ordinal regression analysis: fitting the proportional odds model using Stata, SAS and SPSS. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 8, 632–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHale, S. M., Crouter, A. C., McGuire, S. A. & Updegraff, K. A. (1995) Congruence between mothers’ and fathers’ differential treatment: links with family relationships and children’s well-being. Child Development 66, 116–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McHale, S. H., Updegraff, K. A. & Whiteman, S. D. (2012) Sibling relationships and influences in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Marriage and Family 74, 913–930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michalski, R. L., Russell, D. P., Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2007) Siblicide and genetic relatedness in Chicago, 1870–1930. Homicide Studies 11, 231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modecki, K. L., Hagan, M. J., Sandler, I. & Wolchik, S. A. (2015) Latent profiles of nonresidential father engagement six years after divorce predict long-term offspring outcomes. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology 44, 123–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Brien, M. & Speight, S. (2013) Fathers, Work and Families in Twenty-First Century Britain: Beyond the Breadwinner Model? UCL, London.Google Scholar
OECD (2014) OECD Family Database. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Office of National Statistics (2014) Stepfamilies in 2011. Office of National Statistics, London.Google Scholar
Parker, G. A. (1985) Models of parent–offspring conflict. V. Effects of the behaviour of the two parents. Animal Behaviour 33, 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. A, Royle, N. J. & Hartley, I. R. (2002) Intrafamilial conflict and parental investment: a synthesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 357, 295–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettay, J. E., Rotkirch, A., Courtiol, A., Jokela, M. & Lummaa, V. (2013) Effects of remarriage after widowhood on long-term fitness in a monogamous historical human population. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollet, T. V. (2007) Genetic relatedness and sibling relationship characteristics in a modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior 28, 176–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollet, T. V. & Hoben, A. D. (2011) An evolutionary perspective on siblings: rivals and resources. In Salmon, C. A. & Shackelford, T. K. (eds) The Oxford Handbook on Evolutionary Family Psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 128–148.Google Scholar
Rotkirch, A., Lyons, M., David-Barrett, T. & Jokela, M. (2014) Gratitude for help among friends and siblings. Evolutionary Psychology 12, 673–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmon, C. A. (1999) On the impact of sex and birth order on contact with kin. Human Nature 10, 183–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmon, C. A. (2003) Birth order and relationships: friends, family, sexual partners. Human Nature 14, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmon, C. A. & Daly, M. (1998) Birth order and familial sentiment: middleborns are different. Evolution and Human Behavior 19, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, C. A. & Hehman, J. A. (2014) The evolutionary psychology of sibling conflict and siblicide. In Shackelford, T. K. & Hansen, R. D. (eds) The Evolution of Violence. Springer, New York, pp. 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, C. A. & Hehman, J. A. (2015) Evolutionary perspectives on the nature of sibling conflict: the impact of sex, relatedness, and co-residence. Evolutionary Psychological Science 1, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, C. A. & Malcolm, J. (2011) Parent-offspring conflict. In Salmon, C. A. & Shackelford, T. K. (eds) The Oxford Handbook on Evolutionary Family Psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 83–96.Google Scholar
Schlomer, G. L., Del Giudice, M. & Ellis, B. J. (2011) Parent–offspring conflict theory: an evolutionary framework for understanding conflict within human families. Psychological Review 118, 496–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segal, N. L. & Marelich, W. D. (2011) Social closeness and gift giving by twin parents toward nieces and nephews: an update. Personality and Individual Differences 50, 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, N. L., Seghers, J. P., Marelich, W. D., Mechanic, M. & Castillo, R. (2007) Social closeness of monozygotic and dizygotic twin parents toward their nieces and nephews. European Journal of Personality 21, 487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, C. & Davidson, J. (2009) Recent trends in child maintenance schemes in 14 countries. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 23, 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanskanen, A. O. & Danielsbacka, M. (2014) Genetic relatedness predicts contact frequencies with siblings, nieces and nephews: results from the Generational Transmissions in Finland surveys. Personality and Individual Differences 50, 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanskanen, A. O., Danielsbacka, M. & Rotkirch, A. (2015) More injuries in half sibling than full sibling households in the UK. Journal of Individual Differences 36, 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1974) Parent–offspring conflict. American Zoologist 14, 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, S. A, Pen, I. & Griffin, A. S. (2002) Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science 296, 72–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolke, D., Tippett, N. & Dantchev, S. (2015) Bullying in the family: sibling bullying. The Lancet Psychiatry 10, 917–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voorpostel, M. & van der Lippe, T. (2007) Support between siblings and between friends : two worlds apart? Journal of Marriage and Family 69, 1271–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar